Most Helpful Customer Reviews
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
It's great to be back in New York City, October 16, 2004
This review is from: NYC 1978: Live January 7 at the Palladium, NYC (Audio CD)
This Ramones concert took place seven days after the concert that was released as the It's Alive album. How does this concert differ from that one? Not by much, really. The set list is identical and even in the same order, with the exception of "Judy is a Punk" not being played during the second encore this time. Despite having one less song, this CD actually runs a bit longer than the other one, because on It's Alive some of the breaks between songs were cut down, most notably the breaks between the three encores. Joey's stage patter is, of course, different at the two shows. Other than that, there are no real differences between the concerts. Ramones NYC 1978 is a good, solid Ramones concert, and so is It's Alive. I would recommend getting either one, but only the Ramones biggest fans will need to get both of them.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Incredible!, May 27, 2004
This review is from: NYC 1978: Live January 7 at the Palladium, NYC (Audio CD)
I used to have a copy of "It's Alive," which I thought was a great live CD. However, one day I was browsing the shelves at a local music store, and I noticed a copy of this CD on sale for $10. I looked at the track listing and noticed it was almost the same as "It's Alive," and one of the guys at the store told me that someone had bought that same copy, then he returned it because "It sounds like every other Ramones' CD." Go figure. Anyway, I figured, "What the hell? It's only $10." I bought it and took it home, and it sounded INCREDIBLE!!! I think it's better than "It's Alive" because the concert takes place on the Ramones' home turf, so they feel more within their element. The sound is more rough and raw and in-your-face, and it captures the Ramones at their finest. Don't get me wrong, "It's Alive" is still a great CD, but it just doesn't quite have the same energy. I gave my copy to a friend, so now I just listen to "NYC 1978."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
It's great to be back in New York City!, March 3, 2009
This review is from: NYC 1978: Live January 7 at the Palladium, NYC (Audio CD)
After several months of listening the decision is in: NYC 1978 is better than It's Alive. This marks are reversal of the opinion voiced in my review of It's Alive written shortly after I first heard NYC 1978. It's Alive had long been an album of which I was very fond. My love for that album blinded me to the truth, and I was unwilling to accept the possibility that there existed a better Ramones album.
Nevertheless, NYC'78 occasionally made its way into my car stereo. And I, of course, would proceed to rock out to its glorious noise.
Several days ago I dusted off It's Alive and decided to take it for a ride. I am sad to say that it just wasn't the same. The New Year's Eve performance felt dull, uninspired, bland. It felt less honest, less potent, less vibrant---less Alive.
Only time will tell, but I am inclined to think that It's Alive may become obsolete. NYC 1978 contains the same set of songs recorded just a week after the London performance. The fundamental difference between the two records is found in the sound quality of each recordings. Ultimately, it is difficult to fathom how anyone could deny that the later performance is in this respect superior.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|