Product Details

• Actors: Jason Statham, Kristana Loken, John Rhys-Davies
• Directors: Uwe Boll
• Format: AC-3, Color, Dolby, DVD, Subtitled, Widescreen, NTSC
• Language: English
• Subtitles: English, Spanish
• Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  
• Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
• Number of discs: 1
• Rated: PG-13 (Parental Guidance Suggested)
• Studio: 20th Century Fox
• DVD Release Date: April 15, 2008
• Run Time: 127 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 2.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (104 customer reviews)
• ASIN: B00140PK82
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #12,702 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)
• For more information about "In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale" visit the Internet Movie Database (IMDb)

Editorial Reviews

The life of a simple family man named Farmer (Jason Statham) is changed forever when a horrifying army of animal-like warriors known as Krugs who are controlled by the evil Gallian (Ray Liotta) invade his village murder his son and kidnap his wife. Farmer sets out on a momentous journey to get his wife back and along the way encounters magic and adventure as the quest soon reveals his real destiny in the kingdom.System Requirements:Running Time: 127 minutesFormat: DVD MOVIE Genre: ACTION/ADVENTURE/SWORD & SORCERY Rating: PG-13 UPC: 024543509110 Manufacturer No: 2250911

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

178 of 202 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Tragic magic, February 23, 2008

By 

Amanda Richards (Georgetown, Guyana) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale (DVD)

This movie is so unbelievably bad that I have to break it down into parts for this review.

Overview:

Based on a video game, it comes over as The Lord of the Rings lite, complete with Orc-like Krugs, John Rhys Davies, and a guy with a Legolas hairstyle. Bad guy Gallian (Ray Liotta) swirls around in clouds of smoke, and does his business through the eyes, ears and lips of really big Krugs who ride horses.

The only redeeming parts are the fight scenes with Statham, and even the battle scenes get monotonous after a while. And speaking of the battle scenes, we get the infantry and the archers and so on, but why do we have ninjas and Amazonian tree women in the mix-up? (Mind you, Kristanna Loken of the L-Word looks really good wrapped in leaves)

Leelee Sobieski is underutilized as the daughter of Rhys Davies character Merick, but comes into her own at the end, while Matthew Lillard does his Scooby Doo thing mainly for comic relief.

Short Attention Span Summary (SASS)

1. A farmer named Farmer farms his land with his family
2. Marauding Krugs under the command of Gallian attack
3. See Farmer fight
4. Fight Farmer, fight
5. Farmer fights in vain, but lives to fight again
6. The King wants Farmer in his army, but Farmer wants to be a one-man show
7. No man is an island
8. Farmer signs up, but has problems with the armor, which doesn't suit his image
9. Battle scenes
10. Change of leadership occurs
11. Grand finale with bad guy proves that books have power
12. Women totally rock


Characters:

Jason Statham's role

There once was a farmer named Farmer
Who was rugged, but really no charmer
When the Krugs came for battle
He killed them like cattle
Without ever wearing his armor

Ray Liotta's role

There once was a power drunk mage
Who totally failed to engage
He is so badly cast
It will leave you aghast
As he stinks up his time on the stage

John Rhys Davies' role

Though this ain't The Lord of the Rings
We're glad for the class that he brings
And though he's on his own
There's a Legolas clone
To help the return of the kings

Burt Reynolds' role

We're more than a little bit hurt
To see what's become of old Burt
More tired than mean
He's a creaky machine
Out of gas, and now fully inert

Conclusion:

This movie's no more than a joke
Filled with nothing but mirrors and smoke
With ninjas and magic
The plotline is tragic
And it's NOT Uwe Boll's master stroke.


Amanda Richards, February 23, 2008

9 of 10 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Three Stars!?! What the eff is wrong with you!!?!?, April 2, 2009

By 

T.D. Ferguson (Atlanta, GA USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: In the Name of the King - A Dungeon Siege Tale (DVD)

There were two movies that came out in 2008 which probably rank among the worst in history, this one and Punisher: War Zone.

This movie sucks. You can pretty much ignore what every character says and just insert something you know from Lord of the Rings or Willow. You'll be close enough that it won't matter. Better yet, just watch it in German. It is after all the director's native language. As for the plot, again, just make up your own details from what you've read and seen. You can see the formula revealed without much effort.

"But you gave it three stars, dip****!!"

Yes, and here's why. This film is a monument to bad filmmaking, a milestone that may never be surpassed. It's a clash of opposites though because it is an incredibly expensive, slick production. I would call it one of the most well-made bad movies ever. So much effort and expense went into casting, action sequences, choreography and special effects that it should have been good, but Boll made it awful, so awful that I had to keep watching to see how much more awful it was going to get. Here's a quick breakdown:

Farmer's name is Farmer and he's hero Jason Statham (possibly the only good casting choice).

Farmer's friend is Ron Perlman who for some reason isn't cast as creepy bad guy.

Creepy bad guy is Ray Liotta, which doesn't make sense because he's got in Irish blood in him so he could never be a made man (It's Ray freaking Liotta in a freaking Fantasy movie, what can you say to that!?).

The role of Gandalf will be played by Gimli, son of Gloin.

The role of Arwen/Eowyn will be played by Leelee Sobieski, who is young, pretty and maybe talented, but honestly, the fact that she is in it at all should tell you it's a bad movie. She may consider finding a new agent.

It's a fantasy movie and Burt Reynolds is in it. Why? Because they could, I guess.

Burt Reynolds's toadie is Matthew Lillard, which should be another tip-off that it will be a bad movie.

So the hero decides to be a hero, fights some nondescript bad guys, rallies more people to fight nondescript bad guys, then it all comes to a head and they all fight the one descript (well, if nondescript is a word...) Ray Liotta (Ray Liotta?? Seriously??). Lots of fighting and dialogue reminiscent of Star Wars prequel trilogy (low blow, I realize that) ensue along the way.

In two words, it's heroicly bad. If you are a real movie buff, you HAVE to see this movie just to see how bad it is. It's as if you're watching bad film history unfold before your eyes. That is the only reason I give it a positive rating, because for better or for worse (mostly worse), it's worth seeing.

13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars A "King" of Shreds and Patches, January 11, 2008

By 

Chris Pandolfi (Los Angeles, CA) - See all my reviews
(TOP 1000 REVIEWER)   

This review is from: In the Name of the King [Theatrical Release] (Theatrical Release)

"In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale" is Uwe Boll's most ambitious film, which is probably why it's also one of his worst. Here's a story that wants to be an epic fantasy but completely skimps on the epic part--the remaining fantasy is occasionally enjoyable at best. The battle sequences are small-scale and oddly claustrophobic, the characters are broadly drawn, and the dialogue is some of the dopiest I've ever heard. I suppose it would have been too much to expect something more, given that this is a film adaptation of a video game. But that really isn't saying much, since Boll's filmography consists largely of video game adaptations, and almost none of them have been decent. I exempt his previous film, "Bloodrayne," simply because it was just mindless enough for the entertainment to sink in. I concede that "In the Name of the King" has moments of entertainment, but since most of the film is about as unintentionally campy as a B science fiction film from the 1950s, that's not much of a compliment.

Most of the problems stem from the casting choices: virtually every actor seemed like a square peg in a story full of round holes. Let's begin with the first billed actor, Jason Statham. He plays Farmer, so named because he feels that a man is defined by what he does; much like the archetypal heroes of fantasy plots, Farmer begins as a humble, land-toiling family man, only to eventually discover that his destiny calls for greater things. And yes, he's reluctant to take part in it, since the only life he knows is planting and harvesting crops. But a personal tragedy pushes him into the need for vengeance, a need that will only be met if he joins the King's army to fight the kingdom's enemies. Statham could have been right for this role had he not relied on his macho action-picture persona--Farmer is not too far removed from Frank Martin of the "Transporter" films, with his over the top fighting skills and a voice that's as soft and monotone as Steven Segal's.

Next, let's focus on Ray Liotta. He plays a wicked magus called Gallian, and as you might expect, he's gone mad with power and wants complete control of the kingdom. I don't know if I've ever seen an actor more out of place in a film; Liotta has played some evil characters before, but his bland American accent and under-whelming resolve proves that he just can't play evil in a fantasy film. Gallian has a pseudo-love affair with a strong-willed young woman named Muriella (Leelee Sobieski), who doesn't seem to realize that their relationship is a threat to the kingdom. She also doesn't seem to realize that the chemistry between them is nonexistent, despite the fact that he's teaching her to harness her own magical powers. She has powers, by the way, because her father is another magus. His name is Merick (John Rhys-Davies), and he's a good man who's dedicated to the King. He also takes a special interest in Farmer, since he believes him to be a man of great importance.

And then there's Burt Reynolds as King Konreid. As is the case with Liotta, Reynolds is hopelessly miscast, completely lacking any regal or noble onscreen presence. He seemed more like an afterthought, really, which is bad when you consider the prominence of his role. Bloodthirsty creatures called krugs are attacking Konreid's kingdom in droves (and it should come as no surprise they're under the direct control of Gallian); if he wants to stop them, he'll need a strong army and a little help from Farmer, who has an uncanny ability to survive a battle without wearing any armor. Both Farmer and Konreid fail to realize how important they are to each other, which is why Merick is on hand to explain it to them.

Matthew Lillard is the only actor in this film to manage his role accordingly. He plays Konreid's nephew, Duke Fallow, an arrogant, scheming young man who secretly schemes with Gallian. Unlike the other actors, whose straightforward roles leave much to be desired, Lillard goes in the right direction by thoroughly hamming it up. "In the Name of the King" would have been much better had it been as over the top as Lillard's performance. But to attempt a serious "Lord of the Rings" style fantasy at this scale is laughable, and not in a good way, either.

There are also a number of ill-fitting side characters: Farmer's wife, Solana (Claire Forlani), one of many taken prisoner by the krugs; Farmer's surrogate father, Norick (Ron Pearlman), who tries for comedy relief but gets only the occasional chuckle; Elora (Kristanna Loken), a member of a forest-dwelling, war-hating tribe that swings around on rogue vines. This is about as diverse and interesting as the characterizations get.

The most entertaining part of the film occurs within the final ten minutes: at their final confrontation, Gallian attempts to subdue Farmer with a cyclone of flying books. Not only was it impressive to look at, it was also a delightfully pompous display of power on the part of a sorcerer. I also enjoyed a number of shots showing Gallian surrounded by swirling fog; standing there, he can see through the eyes of a supernatural creature. But there isn't much else to go on, here, which is sad considering how big it wanted to be. I'm sure that "In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale" will someday be regarded as a milestone of camp, an accidental cult classic screened at midnight movie theaters to the delight of select audiences. But I wouldn't hold my breath, if I were you.