Most Helpful Customer Reviews
38 of 39 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Marvelous, October 30, 2004
This review is from: In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire (Phoenix Press) (Paperback)
Goldsworthy successfully draws a picture of how Roman generals actually commanded their armies. This book is in similar style to Goldworthy's first book "The Roman Army at War", which covers how the Roman Army actually fought its battles.
Besides the story of individual generals, this book also traces the development of the Roman style of command as it evolved along with changing Roman society. The story starts with Fabius Maximus and Claudius Marcellus who are elected leaders of citizen soldiers in the Second Punic War and ends with Belisarius, a member of the Imperial household, who is general of an army of unruly mercenary cavalry and questionable infantry. A definite "Roman", style of command emerges which Goldsworthy then follows past the end of the Roman world and into modern times through leaders like Gustavus Adolphus, du Picq and especially Napoleon.
The main Roman leaders covered in the book are:
Fabius Maximus (2nd Punic War)
Claudius Marcellus (2nd Punic War)
Scipio Africanus (2nd Punic War)
Aemilius Paullus (Conquest of Macedonia)
Scipio Aemilianus (Numantia)
Gaius Marius (Jugurthine War / Cimbri & Teutones)
Quintus Sertorius (Roman Civil war in Spain)
Pompey the Great (Conquest of the East)
Julius Caesar (Conquest of Gaul)
There is also a chapter on Pompey vs. Caesar in the Civil War.
Germanicus Caesar (Reprisal war across the Rhine after defeat of Varus)
Domitius Corbulo (Armenian War)
Titus Vespasianus (Siege of Jerusalem)
Emperor Trajan (Dacian Wars)
Emperor Julian (Career on the Rhine and in Parthia)
Belisarius (Persian Wars / Battle of Dara)
Goldsworthy also manages to work in many other prominent Roman generals such as Sulla, Lucullus, Agrippa and Paulinus Seutonius.
If you are interested in military leadership, ancient military history or Roman history in general you should read this book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
26 of 26 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Sound Theory With An Interesting Narrative, May 16, 2005
Roman-era expert Adrian Goldsworthy has written an outstanding history of seven centuries of Roman generalship with his latest volume, In the Name of Rome: The Men Who Won the Roman Empire. This is Goldsworthy's first volume that is focused primarily on individuals, rather than organizational studies of the Roman Army, but he handles the material deftly and brings these characters into sharp focus as individuals, rather than as mere ciphers. Goldsworthy also attempts to divine general lessons about the nature of the Roman command style from the behavior of these generals, many of whom are not well-known to modern readers.
Each chapter in this volume details the career of one or two generals in a given period and the chapters are arranged sequentially, covering the period from the Second Punic War to the 6th Century A.D. Generally, Goldsworthy covers each of these Roman commanders in 25-30 pages as well as providing background material about contemporary conflicts and leaders. It is particularly impressive that Goldsworthy has been able to construct such a rich narrative on these generals, given the fragmentary and incomplete nature of the historical record. The chapters on Sertorius and Corbulo were particularly enlightening. Readers may also note that Goldsworthy's discussion of the Emperor Julian's generalship is far less complementary - although probably more accurate - than some modern accounts that attempt to rank him alongside Julius Caesar.
Goldsworthy disputes the oft-held opinion that Roman generals were military amateurs and instead depicts them as professional public figures who alternated between military, civic and political roles. One of the chief attributes of Roman leaders that Goldsworthy cites is Virtus, the steadfast ability to endure setbacks and to endure until final victory was achieved. Although Roman armies were often defeated, they were rarely demoralized and they usually recovered quickly. While only a few Roman generals were truly gifted soldiers - Scipio Africanus and Julius Caesar being exceptions - most learned how to employ the operational art and tactics that served Rome so well for centuries (unlike modern military leaders, who must constantly update their professional knowledge due to changes in technology and doctrine).
As Goldsworthy notes, Roman generals did not typically participate in close combat, as Greek generals did. Rather, the role of a Roman general on the battlefield was to "serve as a witness to his troops' acts of bravery" and to dispense rewards. Goldsworthy's theory is essentially that Roman troops were primarily motivated by the anticipation of rewards. It is a good theory and certainly one that tracks well with what we know about other armies in history, such as Napoleon's Grande Armee. Goldsworthy also discusses changes in the Roman Army over these centuries, including a greater degree of professionalism and the fact that soldiers became more loyal to their commanders (the one who rewarded them, anyway) than the state. Goldsworthy's hypothesis appears solid and the narrative supports it well. Although readers familiar with Caesar's commentaries, Tacitus and other Roman histories will find few new details here, the skill and clarity with which Goldsworthy weaves together all these accounts into a coherent narrative is truly commendable.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
An enjoyable, intelligent and comprehensive military history, January 13, 2005
I am a new-comer to military history, and thought I should start with the Romans, the ancestors of tactical warfare. I am glad I picked up Mr. Goldsworthy's book. By selecting various generals who have influenced or been indicative of some evolution in military/political atmospheres Goldsworthy has created an extremely broad and interesting history stretching from Fabius Maximus in the Second Punic War right up to Belisarius fighting for the Byzantine Emperor Justinian. Before delving into their military achievements, Goldsworthy outlines the historical context, as there are many century long jumps or more in later chapters where generals became less influenial (or were not allowed to be by paranoid emperors afraid of being toppled), then gives a brief biography of each general - perhaps too brief for my liking. I would have preferred Goldworthy to extend the book by a couple of hundred pages and hand out some more detailed information and analysis of their lives and times; at present these often one or two page linkages are forgotten by the end of the chapter, and certainly by the end of the book. His writing and research is of a high enough standard for any reader to accept such extensions.
On the plus side - and there are many plus sides - Goldsworthy presents a detailed (as detailed as ancient sources can provide) and comprehensive account of military tactics and concerns which are absolutely fascinating. Contrary to popular belief, battles of the time were not simply two big armies walking in to each other. It was a complicated game of flanking and routing, feints and deception, supply line maintenance and organisation, sieging and recruting.
The maps and diagrams are an excellent addition, though I sometimes wish there was a section dedicated purely to maps of the different discussed periods so I can be at least vaguely aware (even if the location is mostly hypothetical) of the locations of provences, cities and enemy lands - though to be fair there are maps sprinkled throughout the volume, but not nearly enough. On the flipside, the glossary and timeline is invaluable.
After reading and immensely enjoying this book, Mr. Goldsworthy can safely say about military history what Gaius Julius Caesar said about himself over two-thousand years ago: "veni, vidi, vici!"
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|