From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
- Sally G. Waters, Stetson Law Lib., St. Petersburg, Fla.
Copyright 1989 Reed Business Information, Inc.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
51 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Too much unneeded detail and clearly biased.,
By A Customer
This review is from: Nap Time: The True Story of Sexual Abuse at a Suburban Day Care Center (Hardcover)
Ms. Manshel better not call herself a journalist. Journalists do not take sides even if they sympathize with a victim. I know this because I am one.It is painfully clear that Manshel wanted to paint Kelly Michaels as an overweight childish woman desperate for sexual gratification by any means possible. She describes Kelly as "pungent" and makes fat-phobic comments about tight clothes and a double chin. Since when does being fat make someone a child molester? I don't know whether she did it or not. I do know her conviction was overturned as a result of the questioning of children. Ms. Manshel further proves her bias by painting Kelly's lawyers as overzealous (which they were) but making the prosecutors look heroic (they were just as overzealous) I also found it sickening how at least half of this way-too long book went into disgusting and graphic details about sexual activities with children. It makes the book pornographic. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
45 of 47 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Seriously - Who's Your REAL Audience?,
By A Customer
This review is from: Nap Time: The True Story of Sexual Abuse at a Suburban Day Care Center (Hardcover)
Now that Christmas is upon us, this tome would make an ideal stocking-stuffer for that special someone. Only problem is, that stocking would have to be made of latex, black leather, or a similarly kinky material. Because this allegedly Upstanding Defense of Children and Condemnation of the Perverted Female is more than a little bent itself.WHY is the bulk of the book devoted to lip-smackingly-graphic descriptions of sex acts between a grown woman and small boys? WHY are we subjected to page after page of scatological and copulatory details, when the author does not even provide notes, trial transcripts, police records, or documentation of any kind? Nothing dry or factual please; go straight for the midsection. Actually, there's another problem. All the cutest twists to the story were left out of this book. Little touches like, er, the fact that the prosecution's star witness (a mother) had been arrested for child abuse herself--and that her implausible verbal "evidence" against Michaels got her off the hook? Oh yes, and there's the little matter of the court focusing for two days on a lesbian experience Michaels had in college. (Wasn't suburban homophobia a handy courtroom tool in the 80's? Sigh.) And the fact that the child witnesses constantly (and emotionlessly) contradicted their own stories when questioned. And why was Ms. Michaels forced to defend her interest in theater and poetry at her trial? More than anything, this book reminds me of the moralistic, drooling postcards from the 1920's of innocent minorities being lynched. I assume it elicited the desired sensations and Ms. Manshel can be proud of her back-alley-creeping, raincoat-wearing clientele.
37 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
A "true" story never properly proven,
By A Customer
This review is from: Nap Time (Mass Market Paperback)
First of all, the title of the book praising itself as a true story of sexual abuse at a day-care is untrue. The Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that because of the ridiculious behavior of the people questioning children there is no way that it could ever be determined if allegations are accurate. Thus the conviction was overturned and Micheals has not been convicted to this day. To summarize Dr. Steven Ceci, professor of developmental studies at Cornell University, there is no doubt children in this case were abused...by the therapists who questioned them. Certianly Dr. Ceci carries much more credibility than the author of this... To gain an accurate report on how the allegations developed, read the Amicus breif submitted to the New Jersey Supreme Court by a group of concerned scientists available in the first volume of psychology, public policy, and the law.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|