11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
""The Last Arab"" deserves attention...., October 5, 2006
This review is from: Nasser: The Last Arab (Hardcover)
Nasser died at 52.
During the last year of his regime he looked a haggard person who walked as though he would faint at any moment.
In his thirties 'Fear' was never a predominant factor influencing his decisions.
The people, though, had not been responsive enough to keep pace with Nasser's ambitions for progress and improvement.
The man was a 'workoholic'- 18 hours per day.
Nasser was firm (but not a dictator).
He did not use his 'office' for personal benefits - conflict of interest -neither for him nor for members of his family.
He's a soldier to the fingertip and, therefore, had a thorough vigilance of the 'politicians', but the dead hand of bureaucracy lingered on.
After the 1967 six days war with Israel, Nasser was emotionally devastated.
It was the feeling of impotence and frustration, that he could do nothing, which made the condition of his health so awful.
I believe the author should have elaborated the above points more forcefully.........
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Needs a second revision, February 14, 2005
This review is from: Nasser: The Last Arab (Hardcover)
Said Aburish's biography of Gamal Abdel Nasser, president of Egypt 1954-1970, is an opinionated examination of one of the most influential figures of the twentieth century - a man who fifty years ago captured the imagination of the Arabic-speaking people "from the Atlantic to the Gulf". The Suez crisis of 1956 made Nasser (as he was known) an international statesman.
The author, a controversial Egyptian-Palestinian journalist based in Nice, lived through Nasser's era stationed in various Arab capitals; he witnessed the rayyes in action many times. He was in Damascus as the Syrian masses descended on the city clamouring for Nasser to come out and speak to them; when he did, he "spoke to them slowly, in a voice of reason and intimacy that told them he loved them too." The world was different then.
The British and French empires were shutting shop, and the US had become the new supremo of the West. Britain and France had carved up the Arab-speaking world between them, and most Arab governments were appointed or arranged by them; oil had been discovered in the fields of Arabia and Iraq; the Suez Canal was run by Britain and France, both of whom would not entrust the vital pathway to Egypt; Algeria was just beginning to fight for long, bloody independence from France.
In Egypt, the pashas, who were less than 2 percent of the population, owned more than 65 percent of the land and exploited millions of peasants who tenanted for them. Furthermore, a new presence had been approved by the major powers, including the USSR: Israel. Even the pro-West Arab governments of the day couldn't stomach this new, imposed entity, and they fought its founding, but lost.
It was at this time that a young army officer from an ordinary Egyptian background appeared. Aburish portrays him somewhat sketchily as a brooding, serious man, an avid reader who also enjoyed playing chess, and a practical man who nevertheless placed honour and dignity first. At first, this untested leader spoke for Egyptians, but soon he directed his rhetoric to all the Arabs. By 1958 he had become the Arab people's undisputed leader, and various governments, including local Arab ones, resented him for it.
What did he want and why? What happened? How did he fare? How did he respond to new events and ideas? What is his legacy? Those are the kind of questions that any biography attempts to answer. In that respect, Said Aburish does a fair job.
Nasser possessed an almost hypnotic ability to inspire his audience and gain its trust, but Aburish says he was beholden to his people's love, unable to tell them what he really thought. In terms of Nasser's capacity to cope with and manage the heavy dose of politicking that occurs in the Middle East, Aburish shows him certainly rising to its demands - and losing his self-control at times, but underestimating the regressive, conservative instinct of the Arab people.
In Egypt, he ruled dictator-like even when he would have won any democratic elections easily. He discarded many opinions of the ruling circle in Egypt when he might have been better served to share his decision-making with them, and he entrusted responsibility to only those he knew to be loyal when he also knew how incompetent and corrupt they were. In pan-Arab affairs, Aburish portrays him as making policy on the hoof; he got himself involved in Algeria, in Yemen, and elsewhere when he knew that Egypt's economy was weak, and that outside forces were conspiring against him (the USA, the USSR, Israel, and Saudi Arabia).
In private, Nasser smoked three packs of cigarettes a day and regularly worked very long hours; throughout the sixties he was not well because of diabetes and heart disease, yet he pressed on - and died at 52.
Said Aburish's biography fails in many respects; it does not possess a timeline of events; there is no map of the region; and the key characters are not introduced beforehand. There are a few punctuation mistakes, and the text does not read well; it needed a good editor.
Aburish has his issues with Islamist movements and does himself no favours by letting us know that, and not explaining himself. Indeed, Aburish fails to offer reasons why Nasser himself was never enamoured with political Islam.
Overall, the biography assumes the reader is familiar with events and launches into opinion too quickly. The author does not balance well between his two responsibilities as biographer: to narrate the various strands of story and to offer insight and opinion. There are too many flaws in this biography; it needs a major revision.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A revolutionary biography, April 15, 2004
This review is from: Nasser: The Last Arab (Hardcover)
In a new revolutionary biography this book delves into many new meanings of the life of Nasser. Nasser served as the leader of Egypt from roughly 1952 tom 1970. These 18 years were dominated by radical social change in Egypt, two wars with Israel, the loss of the Sinai and the conflict in Yemen. Nasser embodied the `free officers' movement and pan Arab nationalism. Nasser made inroads with Ba'athists of Syria and Damascus.
But most of all as this book sheds light on, Nasser was an Nasser's confrontation with Radical Political Islam, a phenomenon that the text argues has now come to dominate the Arab world. Nasser opposed what we call `Wahhibism' or `Fundamental Islamism' and he fought against it openly in the Yemen while making sure to support secularists like Asad and rounding up the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt which was funded by the Saudis and had tried to assassinate him. This impassioned book written by eminent Arab scholar Aburish, who previously wrote studies or Arafat, Saddam and the House of Saud, calls on people to have renewed interest in Arab Nationalism, which Nasser embodied. This book sheds light ont he inner workings of arab politics. A wonderful read, anyone interested in the Modern Arab world, Arab civilization, Egyptian politics, or the inner struggle against radical Islam will enjoy this wonderful biography.
Seth J. Frantzman
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
