Qty:1
  • List Price: $26.95
  • Save: $6.68 (25%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 11 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Excellent Condition. The covers and the pages are in excellent condition. Ships direct from Amazon! Qualifies for Prime Shipping and FREE standard shipping for orders over $35. Overnight and 2 day shipping available!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Add to Cart
Trade in your item
Get a $3.45
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism Paperback – March 22, 2002

ISBN-13: 978-0801487637 ISBN-10: 0801487633 Edition: 1st

Buy New
Price: $20.27
19 New from $20.24 17 Used from $14.32
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$99.00
Paperback
"Please retry"
$20.27
$20.24 $14.32

Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student




Frequently Bought Together

Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism + Warranted Christian Belief + Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism
Price for all three: $67.23

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Paperback: 296 pages
  • Publisher: Cornell University Press; 1 edition (March 22, 2002)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801487633
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801487637
  • Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.2 x 0.7 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #817,697 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Plantinga has both defended and embellished his view in his response to his critics, and sometimes what he has learned from them has strengthened and refined his own argument at important points."—Russell DiSilvestro, Bowling Green State University, Philosophia Christi, 5:1, 2003

"I have been emphasizing the similarities between the critical essays in Beilby's book, but there are important differences as well, differences that add to the depth of the book. Moreover, the similarities give the book a great deal more cohesiveness than one would have expected to find in a collection of essays by distinct authors, especially given the variety of interesting issues raised by Plantinga's argument. Thus, my overall evaluation of the book is very positive."—Paul Draper, Florida International University, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55, 2004

"This book has much to offer scholars in the fields of philosophy, religious studies, theology, and science and religion. I highly recommend its use with upper-level undergraduates through faculty. We are all indebted to Beilby who has deepened the sophistication of a growing discussion of evolutionary epistemology. Does Plantinga defeat naturalism? Read the book and decide for yourself."—Peter Heltzel, Fordham University, Religious Studies Review Vol 30 No 1, January 2004

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

46 of 49 people found the following review helpful By Reader From Aurora on January 23, 2006
Format: Paperback
Edited by James Beilby Naturalism Defeated is a collection of essays responding to Alvin Plantinga's thesis that human rationality is unlikely in a purely naturalistic view of evolution, or in other words, if human cognitive faculties developed in an entirely undetermined manner it is unlikely that reason would be reasonable. This argument has been put forth by Plantinga previously in Warrant and Proper Function. I offer the following thoughts for potential readers.

The discussion is structured in a common format for these types of book-length philosophical examinations. Initially, Plantinga provides an overview of his argument. This is followed by a collection of essays discussing and criticizing his thesis. These comments are then followed by Plantinga response to the various contributors. Often in this style of discussion the principle author is allowed to interact individually with each critic. In the present volume, given the number of contributors, a single comprehensive response at the end appears to be the best approach to minimize redundancy.

Plantinga continues to set the stage for much of the discussion within the philosophy of religion and is arguably one the most capable contemporary philosophical thinkers. His handling of the naturalistic evolution - rationality question is characteristically powerful, clear and clever. Given its sweeping repercussions the perceived success or failure of the various commentators will in significant part be determined by the readers' worldview. For instance some atheists may find Plantinga's contention unpalatable irrespective of its logical and intellectual rigor. Whereas, certain theists may be presupposed to gloss over challenges to Plantinga's proposition.
Read more ›
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
48 of 57 people found the following review helpful By calcidius on December 23, 2002
Format: Paperback
Naturalists are usually seen as paragons of rationality while theists are thought to be at the edge of crazy. Alvin Plantinga's argument challenged this identification questioning even the possibility of holding to Naturalism and trusting the cognitive faculties. This book begins with challenges to the evolutionary argument against naturalism and ends with a response to the challenges by Alvin Plantinga.
The eleven critical essays here are divided into four sections each one dealing with a separate set of objections to the evolutionary argument against naturalism. The argument itself is briefly presented in the beginning and then re-presented even more briefly by each of 'Beilby's cohorts'. There is some repetition in the book, which is not so bad when you're looking for clarification on the most contentious points under discussion.
The main areas of criticism in the book are from Science (Evolution), Skepticism, Conditional Probabilities/Confirmation Theory and the Nature of Epistemic Defeat.
Prior to reading this book I had thought Plantinga's argument was very strong -- so I was basically looking for objections that I was unaware of and answers to those objections; I found a lot of both. If you already agree with Plantinga you will probably find clarification and strengthening of the argument; if you don't already agree, well, then, I don't know what you'll find maybe shock/horror? Actually, most of the book is critical and provides ammunition for dissenters. But, in the end I think the worst that could be said about the argument is that it was 'bloodied but unbowed' (Plantinga).
I found William Alston's comments very helpful -- they suggest a different way of formulating the argument -- something like a Reductio ad Absurdum I think.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful By Cornell on October 27, 2011
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
So many Scientists now a days, and so much positivism and bad philosophy to go along with it.

So much Lack of philosophical thinking, to go along with materialism. As Bad philosophy = Bad scientific interpretation

So much emphasis on the verification principle, which begs the question how can one use the verification principle on the verification principle?

Well the new age scientists who are naturalists seem to come in with a biased naturalistic mindset of "The Supernatural cannot exist, because the supernatural can't exist" circular reasoning. So now it's time for the real "free-thinkers" to bail us out.

Evolutionary Naturalism asserts brain adaptation for "Survival" not "truth" so this really opens the doors to anyone who has an open-mind.

How can we trust our cognitive faculties? What's the secret the ingredient that gives us a sure way of trusting our reason, when reasoning came from reasonless matter?

Plantinga lays down a beauty and puts forth a great argument against Evolutionary Naturalism
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
11 of 41 people found the following review helpful By Eugene R. Walker on January 6, 2009
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
In *Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Alvin Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism*, Plantinga restates his original argument, followed by eleven essays critical (or not very critical) in varying degrees, and capped by Plantinga's response.

Though the topic is important (four stars?), the book is disappointing (two), so I rather arbitrarily gave it three. The critics are all academic philosophers of various types, but except for Jerry Fodor, none seems to show much depth in science. If only Richard Dawkins, or better yet Daniel Dennett, had been aboard.

To illustrate a way that naturalism plus evolution would not lead to cognitive reliability, Plantinga uses this example:

*So suppose Paul is a prehistoric hominid; a hungry tiger
approaches. Fleeing is perhaps the most appropriate behavior.
I pointed out that this behavior could be produced by a large
number of different belief-desire pairs. To quote myself:
Perhaps Paul very much likes the idea of being eaten, but when
when he sees a tiger, always runs off looking for a better
prospect, because he thinks it unlikely that the tiger he sees
will eat him. This will get his body parts in the right place
so far as survival is concerned, without involving much by way
of true belief.* [Followed by three equally goofy scenarios.]

One can only imagine the guffaws this bizarre fantasy would (or should) provoke. However, they are largely absent from the book. The critics are much too genteel. Maybe academic philosophy is the wrong place for dealing with this; a better venue would be a barnyard, with a great big shovel.
27 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?