5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
New, bold, quick, possible., November 24, 2001
This review is from: The Nature of Consciousness: A Hypothesis (Paperback)
This book goes to the point quickly. No other book on consciousness states its proposal so quickly, efficiently, and elegantly. In the short 150 pages, Pockett exposes and defends her theory adequately. The theory, that spatiotemporal patterns of the electromagnetic field are consciousness, charges against the psychoneural (consciousness as the firing of neurons, or groups of neurons) story boldly. Psychoneuralists need not fear, however. Although the theory presented in the book is interesting, and has neurological evidence in it's side (in a sense), it is by no means the last word on the subject. It is a good theory because it is teastable, clearly stated, and a new way of looking at evidence, but this does not prove it. I myself remain unconvinced, but the book is a worthy read anyway, if consciousness interests you in any way.
Pockett in a way underestimates the psychoneural theory, and could have been more thurough in how her theory would explain binding, how it would fit into an evolutuionary sense, and why we should accept the "electromagnetic pattern = consciousness identity" over "neuron firing procesing information=consciousness" identity. But the book is still good, informative, and original.
Maybe the final sections, heavily speculative (even relative to the hypothesis), about cosmic consciousness and The Electromagnetic Field,could have been omitted. Maybe these speculations should wait for direct experimental testing of the theory (and Pockett proposes a somewhat direct way of doing this).
But at the end, if nothing else, the theory should be considered, discussed and thought about.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No