Viewing copyright in a historical context, Patterson and Lindberg show how its original purposes--to prevent both the monopoly of the book trade and the official censorship of writings--have been lost largely as a result of uninformed jurisprudence. Contributing to the problem have been special-interest groups that have circulated official-looking but misleading copyright “guidelines” for copyright users, librarians, and others. According to the authors, the claims in these intimidating guidelines, such as copying restrictions based on specific word counts, are not legally binding and indeed are often groundless. If the current trend to give publishers and other vested interests even wider protection under copyright continues, warn Patterson and Lindberg, knowledge could become a private commodity to which access is tightly controlled.
The authors also address the effect of recent court rulings in such cases as [J.D.] Salinger v. Random House, Inc., and New Era Pub. Int. v. Henry Holt & Co. (the L. Ron Hubbard biography case). Severely hampering the work of biographers and historians, these controversial rulings appear to have increased the protection of unpublished materials under copyright.
Although copyright as a concept has existed for 450 years, The Nature of Copyright represents the first significant, in-depth examination of its basic philosophical premises. The authors’ ideas and opinions, certain to be viewed as controversial, have implications not just for the print media but for all areas of mass communication and entertainment, from television to music. By focusing on the basic policies and principles of copyright, rather than on case precedents, the authors present a strong argument for preserving the integrity of copyright law and the free flow of information and ideas.
