Most Helpful Customer Reviews
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Still Timely, July 17, 2006
This review is from: The Nature and Logic of Capitalism (Paperback)
A wise and well thought-out booklet. Some readers may be put off by the level of abstraction, but how else can essential properties be discussed other than by abstraction from particular cases. Happily, the text proceeds without the obsessive concern with how things differ-- the hallmark of post-modernism, our intellectual fashion of the day. Nonetheless, the slim volume is not a primer and does make some demands of the reader. In measured terms, Heilbroner characterizes capitalism as a concept and shows how its defining drive to appropriate profits shapes the entire society. There are a number of departures from Marxist social theory (e.g. the formative role of prestige-desire in the accumulation process), but the outline remains basically intact There are, of course, any number of practical upshots resulting from this point of view. One topical result (mine, not his) would be that instead of talking in neutral fashion about Western society or civilization in its current state, it would be more accurate to characterize each as `capitalist' or `bourgeois', since that class dominates the societal formation as a whole. Accordingly, the so-called `clash of civilizations' with the world of Islam, for example, would be better understood as a clash between Western capitalist civilization with whatever one makes of the Islamic side, a conceptual shift that puts a different cast on the nature of the conflict. Thus, instead of descibing the clash as between "freedom" and those "who hate freedom", as Bush invidiously puts it, the conflict would be framed in terms of profits expansion into a previously recalcitrant region of the world. (In that regard, consider L. Paul Bremer's diktats privatizing the Iraq economy, ones that any succeeding govrnment is legally bound to carry out. So much then for Iraqi self-determination!) All in all, this is not a mere quibble over words, but has far-reaching consequences. Again, the obvious touchstone is Marx. And while the author follows the broad outline of Marxian social theory, he also wants to loosen up some of the more determinist elements. There is, for example, no mention of such common determinist staples as `dialectical necessity' or `historical inevitability. Heilbroner's is a much less certain world. In that sense, the book can be viewed as a broad reckoning of what remains relevant from Marx's classic social theory and what does not. Given the Bush administration's uncompromising revival of 19th century economics and imperial expansion, perhaps it's time to take an updated look at capital's foremost 19th-century critic.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
What capitalism IS., April 25, 2004
This review is from: The Nature and Logic of Capitalism (Paperback)
Heilbroner in this book attempts to show what capitalism is, and he looks to a wide range of fields to find the answer. Drawing upon Freud, Smith, Marx and a number of well known economists, philosophers and scholars, he argues that Capitalism is not a state but rather a process, that developed by the inner need of man to dominate and gain power. He contrasts primitive and tributary systems that accumulated surplus for use values with capitalism which seeks surplus for the creation of more surplus; Marx's M-C-M'. The rest of the book builds upon this notion of capital's relentless search for profits. Although you may not completely agree with Heilbroner's analysis of capital, it is important to look into the mirror he holds up to the system we are in. Heilbroner recognizes the defects of socialism and communism as alternatives to the capitalist system, but he also shows that capitalism as a system is built upon domination by the political system and then exploitation by capital of those who rely upon the system for their sustenance. Although it is a relatively short book for the subject matter it covers, it is quite dense. Heilbroner's prose at times was too cryptic for me. I don't know whether he intentionally made the work more difficult than it need be to impress, but he would have succeeded more in his purpose to persuade if he was clearer in his exposition. What was not satisfactorily answered for me is why the appropriation of surplus value by capital is wrong. Heilbroner argues that the return to capital is really a misnomer as it is the appropriation of surplus value created by labor. But surely the capitalist in order to have an incentive to allow the use of his capital and the risk he takes when he enters the market, is entitled to a share of the surplus value of labor. Heilbroner's book is a necessary one for all those who live in a capitalist society. It questions the assumptions upon which our capitalist system is based. For those of you who are free-market fundamentalists, this book should be a sobering experience. I think everyone, of whatever political persuasion, should read this book. After all, if the free market is as good as you think it is, what harm is there in trying to see what some socialist says about it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Short additions, November 3, 2005
This review is from: The Nature and Logic of Capitalism (Paperback)
I won't add too much to what the other reviewers have already said. This is a good read, but it can be offputting because of the way the author writes (almost train-of-thought from a erudite speaker). Stick with it though, as it becomes more comfortable a few chapters in (unfortunately, the book's only 7 chapters!). If anything, I think it's possible to skip the preface and first chapter, which I didn't find all that illuminating. He defines what "nature" (causes, reasonings) and "logic" (manifestations, rules, expressions of nature) are from an abstract point of view, but takes an entire chapter to say it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|