Nebula Awards 33: the Year's Best SF and Fantasy Chosen by the Science-fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (v. 33) [Paperback]

Poul Anderson (Author), Jerry Oltion (Author), Vonda N. McIntyre (Author), Nancy Kress (Author), Jane Yolen (Author), Connie Willis (Editor)

Book Description

Publication Date: April 29, 1999

The coveted Nebula Awards are the only SF awards bestowed annually by the writers'' own demanding peers. This volume features work by, among others, Poul Anderson, Nelson Bond, Kim Stanley Robinson, Ellen Datlow and Geoffrey Landis.'

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

The latest collection of trophy-winners and runners-up for the Nebulas, which are awarded by the SFWA, is a rainbow of styles and content. Editor Willis (Bellwether), herself a six-time Nebula winner, introduces each selection with an enthusiastic appreciation. Each story is followed by the author's notes on its creation. There are also insightful short essays on the year's science as well as its fiction by expert authors and editors, plus older stories by 1997's Author Emeritus Nelson Bond and Grand Master Poul Anderson, the latter contributing a fine space yarn with a Platonic drama of ideas and a knockout surprise ending. The prose ranges from the futuristic lighting of Michael Swanwick ("The chauffeur wore combat-grade photomultipliers") to the gracefully mythopoeic style of Vonda McIntyre ("The wild eerie melody quickened Marie-Jos?phe's heart"). All the fiction entries are richly imagined; some are polished literary constructions as well. Karen Joy Fowler is represented by a deft experimental conflation of historical Elizabeths, including Borden, Cady-Stanton and one of the queens, and there is a little of the expected "hard" SF, too. Gregory Feeley's "The Crab Lice" is one of several pieces that wonderfully illuminate present events by imagined ones in the past instead of the more typical SF sallies into the future. Feeley shows us Aristophanes at loggerheads with the god Dionyos; Jane Yolen gives us Emily Dickinson chatting with an extraterrestrial. Overall, this is an excellent skimming of the current SF crop, conveying a good sense of the field's variety, sophistication and breadth.
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.

From School Library Journal

YA-This solid anthology of stories and essays represents the breadth and diversity of the genre. Most of the selections fall more toward the science fiction end of the spectrum. No unicorns or wizards here. Instead, Emily Dickinson meets an alien in "Sister Emily's Lightship." "Abandon in Place" is a thrilling ghost story about what happens to the space program in the wake of tragedy and budget cuts. A few stories, like "The Elizabeth Complex," require careful reading. Interspersed with the well-written and thought-provoking stories are essays that are less compelling. Few YAs will like every offering in this volume, but there's sure to be something here to please just about everyone.
Susan Salpini, Purcellville Library, VA
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.

See all Editorial Reviews

Product Details

• Paperback: 272 pages
• Publisher: Harcourt Brace/Harvest; Softcover Anthology edition (April 29, 1999)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0156006014
• ISBN-13: 978-0156006019
• Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 6 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
• Average Customer Review: 2.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,864,586 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing, January 17, 2000

By 

Gerard Hildebrand - See all my reviews

This review is from: Nebula Awards 33: the Year's Best SF and Fantasy Chosen by the Science-fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (v. 33) (Paperback)

History repeats itself: Two years ago I read Nebula Awards 31. The only story that engaged me was by Grand Master AE Van Vogt - a story written over 50 years ago. I don't remember much else about that volume.

Nebula Awards 33 concludes with a story by Grand Master Poul Anderson written about 40 years ago. It's easily the best thing in the book. If I were to guess what this means about contemporary short science fiction, I would say the genre is not only short on new ideas, but it has lost the joy of the narrative. Indeed, little happens in many of these stories. And, as the earlier reviewer noted, many really aren't sf. Jane Yolen's award-winning story about Emily Dickinson and a spaceship is silly and unnecessary. Gregory Feeley's story is interesting, but there's no narrative. John Howard Gardner's story has perhaps the best science fictional idea. It deals with certain snake-like analogues in human blood which have a religious significance that affected society. But, it's just some conversational set-pieces with no narrative. Nancy Kress's piece starts good, gets better, and then just ends. (Is there a novel in the works?) The one story with spaceships is actually a ghost story.

Science fiction and fantasy writers are perhaps entitled to pat themselves on the back from time to time - after all few others do. But editor Connie Willis's gushy endorsements do nobody any good. Rather than let the reader judge the stories, she keeps telling us how good they are. (No analysis is provided.) She makes the absurd claim that this volume is as good as the first volume, which contained much-anthologized classic works by Aldiss, Ellison and Zelazny.

Willis mourns her inability to include all the nominees while including nine (!) gushy pages on Poul Anderson and about one apiece on each story. The volume concludes with a totally unnecessary (and, except for a piece by Kim Stanley Robinson, facile) collection of pieces about 1997. But who cares about 1997 in the middle of 1999? It includes about 10 pages ripped out from the award winning novel. (Why do this? The novel will probably have greater circulation than this collection.) Maybe K.D. Wentworth wouldn't have the ignominy of being the only short-story nominee left out had all this unnecessary material been tossed.

4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Good summary of the year, August 15, 2002

By 

Glen Engel Cox (Columbus, Ohio) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Nebula Awards 33: the Year's Best SF and Fantasy Chosen by the Science-fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (v. 33) (Paperback)

Another collection of this long-running series that presents the award-winning fiction for the previous year. I'll comment on the individual stories:

Jane Yolen, "Sister Emily's Lightship" -- I've never been a Yolen fan. While I find her prose professional enough, I've never read anything by her that would make me jump up and rush out to force someone to read it. This story is no exception. The premise of Emily Dickinson meeting an alien is too...precious, and Yolen's sole contribution to that premise in this story is to emphasize some of the ethereal and otherworldly quality of Dickinson's poetry, and that doesn't come until the end. Yeah, she did her Dickinson research, but so what? Other than the alien, there is no reason for this story to be science fiction (see "Abbess Phone Home" in the Turkey City Lexicon).

James Patrick Kelly, "Itsy Bitsy Spider" -- Uses technology of the future to portray a true human characteristic.

Vonda McIntyre, excerpt from The Moon and the Sun -- As someone who has not read this Nebula-winning novel, the excerpt presented here does exactly what it is supposed to do--whet your appetite for more. I had no idea what the subject of the book was before I read this, now I do, and have had a taste of how it is told. I'm not going to rush out and get it, but I'm much more interested now than I was before.

Nancy Kress, "The Flowers of Aulit Prison" -- An excellent story with its basis in that most Phil Dickian question, "What is reality?" This is the kind of SF that I look for, where aliens help us understand, through them as a metaphor, a fundamental idea of life. That it has a plot, an unique setting, and fascinating characters makes it an award winner. I'm not giving anything away with this one, but just point you to it and say, "go read."

Gregory Feeley, "The Crab Lice" -- I disliked the beginning of this story so much that I didn't even finish it. There was nothing for me to grab onto to orient myself in the story, and life is just too short.

Nelson Bond, "The Bookshop" -- A nice little classic story, where every writer's fantasy comes true, but at a price, of course. You could do a collection of these ultimate library tales (Borges comes to mind).

James Alan Gardner, "Three Hearings on the Existence of Snakes in the Bloodstream" -- A great story, with some unique twists to alternate history (so much better than the Feeley).

Michael Swanwick, "The Dead" -- An audacious story, and right up my alley. I liked it well enough, but there was something missing--I'm not sure what, maybe more of an explanation for the Donald character and his background. The anger that it stems from is good.

Karen Joy Fowler, "The Elizabeth Complex" -- This could have been as bad as the Yolen, yet it works to some extent because of its experimental nature. I wouldn't want a steady diet of these things, but once was interesting.

Jerry Oltion, "Abandon in Place" -- Wow, I liked this story a lot, even though it is so ridiculous that it is laughable. One must come at this as if reading a fairy tale--there is nothing plausible here. The science is bogus, the characters are straight wish-fulfillment from Heinlein days. But the mythology is strong, and if one has any remorse for the space program whatsoever, there's a good chance that it will tug the correct strings.

Poul Anderson, "The Martyr" -- A classic from the latest grand master, a nice little mystery about why those infuriating aliens continue to treat us differently.

All in all, this is a worthy volume to grab, especially if you don't want to dedicate the time to reading the Dozois' Year's Best or the magazines themselves.

3 of 5 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Disappointing, only a nodding acquaintance to SF, December 23, 1999

By 

Elli Ron "elliron" (Kirkland, WA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Nebula Awards 33: the Year's Best SF and Fantasy Chosen by the Science-fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (v. 33) (Paperback)

A marked disappointment, considering the traditions of the Nebula books. It is possible that they are good stories but a large majority is not SF (in my book). The stories do (in general) improve as the reader progresses through the book,however even the best is only mediocre. The long introductions are just a waste of space (:-), and to add insult to injury,it contains an excerpt from a novel, and a whole spiel (some 10 pages) about a Nebula man of the year (or similar). Buy it if you must, my copy is going to be binned.