Did My Neurons Make Me Do It? and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy New
$79.14
Qty:1
  • List Price: $85.00
  • Save: $5.86 (7%)
Usually ships within 1 to 3 weeks.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Did My Neurons Make Me Do It?: Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Moral Responsibility and Free Will Hardcover – August 2, 2007

ISBN-13: 978-0199215393 ISBN-10: 0199215391

Buy New
Price: $79.14
20 New from $73.25 18 Used from $27.02
Amazon Price New from Used from
eTextbook
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$79.14
$73.25 $27.02

Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student



NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 236 pages
  • Publisher: Oxford University Press (August 2, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0199215391
  • ISBN-13: 978-0199215393
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 6.4 x 9.1 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.5 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (3 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #2,711,158 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review


"A nicely written, engaging book that makes a genuine contribution to the growing literature on mental causation."--Science


"A nicely written, engaging book that makes a genuine contribution to the growing literature on mental causation."--Science


"Murphy and Brown's arguments are complex, sophisticated and witty, drawing from theology, moral philosophy, neurobiology, and computational theory."--Brain


About the Author

Nancey Murphey is at Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena California. Warren S. Brown is at Fuller Graduate School.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
2
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
1
1 star
0
See all 3 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

26 of 28 people found the following review helpful By Alexander J. Szczech on January 14, 2008
Format: Hardcover
"Did My Neurons Make Me Do It" isn't an easy read, especially if you're not conversant in philosophical terminology and concepts. That said, if you are interested in the question of free will in the age of neurobiology then the book is well worth the effort. Murphy and Brown make a compelling argument that, even when embracing a physicalist view of the brain, i.e., no non-material mind, a degree of downward causation by a moral actor is possible by way of higher order processes that emerge in the brain providing a framework for chemical brain events, and which engage the outer environment in action-feedback-evaluation-action loops. Highly recommended.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful By V. Holmes on February 21, 2009
Format: Hardcover
As part of a solid and well thought through academic review, Murphy and Brown suggest that popularizations of recent developments in neuroscience and philosophy have begun to stimulate public discussion. However, they suggest that many popularizers are not only physicalists but also ardent reductionists. Essentially the main theme of their argument seems to be to counter the position that all physicalist accounts of the human condition need necessarily be reductive.

On this basis, they move toward the development of a theory that avoids the hangovers of Cartesian materialism and causal reductionism by viewing the human condition as part of a self directed, self causing system. They achieve this by drawing on the seminal work of leading thinkers likes Juarrero, Deacon, Ellis, Sperry, Van Gulick, Dennett and Damasio (to name but a few). Of central importance to Murphy and Brown's argument appear to be concepts like emergence, supervenience and downward causation, all of which enable the possibility of higher and lower ordering principles, interlevel causality and dynamic processes.

Even if you don't agree with the final conclusions or ultimate positions of these authors; the book is a brilliant resource for anyone wanting to understand more about current scientific and philisophical debates underpinning contemporary neuroscientific research. Highly recommended!
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
26 of 35 people found the following review helpful By James R on March 28, 2008
Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Murphy and Brown's central thesis is that free will exists because reductionism is invalid for complex systems due to the imposition of higher-order system rules upon the base elements of the system. An example they provide is that DNA sequences do not totally specify themselves, but rather must take into account the interplay of higher levels of organization, such as the environment in which the organism finds itself, which determines the fitness of the organism, which therefore, in a manner of speaking, is "downward causation" (meaning, the environment is actually specifying the DNA sequence, so information/control is moving from the higher level to lower level, not vice versa as one might intuit).

They use arguments such as this as evidence that atoms are not in control of everything, but rather systems and their associated rules must be accounted for as well.

I don't think anyone would dispute that in a complex system there are multiple levels of organization, and that the interplay of systems at different levels all have a bearing on the final outcome. However, the authors seem to think that the existence of systems with emergent properties across multiple hierarchical levels somehow translates into free will.

The rules of the system are still the rules of physics. Nothing they hypothesize departs from a clockwork, mechanistic view of the universe. And, such a view would seem to imply that free will does not exist since the system is bound by its rules (however complex or at whatever level of hierarchy they occur) and could thus be predicted (ok, let's not get into a discussion of chaos theory, but you get the idea -- whether or not the system could actually be predicted, it's not an argument for free will).
Read more ›
7 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search