Most Helpful Customer Reviews
50 of 55 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
How to Build a Better Conservative, October 18, 2009
This review is from: The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward (Hardcover)
It should be recalled that Bruce Bartlett was one of the primary advocates of supply-side economics in the late 70s and early 80s. In fact he was one of the main authors of the Kemp-Roth bill, which called for steep tax cuts in the top marginal income tax rates to spur economic growth. Ronald Reagan ran with this idea in 1980 and tax cuts were enacted into law a year later, thereby ushering in more than two decades of robust economic growth. In 1981 Bartlett wrote a book about this experience called Reaganomics: Supply Side Economics in Action.
In his new book, The New American Economy, he tells us that supply-side economics has outlived its usefulness, at least for now. In the late 70's we had high taxes and high demand which caused inflation; today we have relvatively low taxes and also low demand, which causes deflation. Supply-side economics no longer needs to be advocated, for it has already become part of everyone's way of thinking. Even the Obama Administration has its share of supply-siders. The stimulus package called for tax cuts for the vast majority and a small increase for the top percentile, still low historically.
According to Bartlett, Keynesian economics or fiscal policy is the best response to the current crisis. This is an apostasy to his conservative friends, where Keynesian is always a pejorative for a big government spending program. However, with interest rates at the bottom, it is obvious that government spending is the only way out of the current liquidity trap. If business and the consumer are not spending the government must. Not surpisingly, Bartlett was in favor of this year's stimulus package, not for its tax cuts, which he thought ineffective, but for its public spending component.
In the current book, the author has some sharp criticisms, in turn, for his conservative critics. He has previously explained on how conservatism has gone astray under Bush II in his book Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy. Here he reiterates that the notion that a tax cut can solve all problems is as ridiculus as it is damaging. A tax cut with a reduction in spending would have been welcome, but the starve-the-beast theory that has played out has led us to the financial precipice . This corrupt form of conservatism of the last 8 years has done such damage to our economy and federal budget that we have limited resources for the current crisis.
Ironically, the current crisis calls for further budget deficits as Bartlett has pointed out. But within this quagmire there is an opening for modern conservatism to emerge. Bartlett claims that he has not abandoned conservatism rather the so-called conservatives have. Conservatives should be dedicated to keeping government small and taxes low. For example, congressional Republicans should do more to shape the current healthcare debate by participating in it to keep costs down, rather than stand on the sidelines and attack any Demcratic attempt to cut, for example, Medicare or any other healthcare benefits. There is nothing conservative about this, it is pure partisan politics.
This book is the beginnings of a blueprint for building a better conservative or at least one that is relavant for today's crisis.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Apologies in advance for the long-winded review, January 25, 2010
This review is from: The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward (Hardcover)
To say I was intrigued by a book subtitled "The Failure of Reaganomics" by one of its staunchest proponents is an understatement. I found an honesty in this writing I didn't expect, even if it comes across as somewhat self-serving at times.
Mr Bartlett starts out with a retrospective on the Great Depression and John Maynard Keynes. He confesses that he grew up professionally as a Keynes detractor, only to come around later in his career to realize that Keynes wasn't the one-dimensional figure he'd spoken out against - his policies had merit for their day, and his later writings calling for a return to fiscal conservatism, had gone largely unnoticed by Keynes' followers as well as detractors, including himself. Mr Bartlett does an admirable job of resurrecting Keynes as a conservative who sought only to save liberal democracy in the most expedient way. Here we get the most poignant lesson of the book.
The key theme in The New American Economy is that one size does not fit all. Mr Bartlett uses the person of Keynes as a teaching point. Keynes recommended a policy of government spending to lift the economy out of depression based on the need at the time, with the expectation that policy would change as the crisis du jour subsided; Keynes had no intention or expectation that policy makers would blindly apply one prescription to all ills. Through the rest of the book up to the concluding chapter, Mr Bartlett provides examples ad nauseum of the fact that blind prescription is what happened in fact. The parade of personalities and examples creates a muddle for the reader in the middle of the book, but the key themes are clear.
Mr Bartlett first outlines the "Keynesians" (who, he argues, bore little resemblance to what JM Keynes advocated); later he turns the pen on his own family - supply-siders in the 1970s who, like Keynes 40 years earlier, introduced a different approach more suitable to the crisis at hand. Following the success of Reaganomics (an ironic and self-serving assertion given the book's subtitle), supply-siders charted the same historical course as the "Keynesians" culiminating in Mr Bartlett's damning summary of GW Bush's performance as betraying the principles of conservatism and supply-side economics.
I'm unclear as to whether the final chapter is a contradiction of the rest of the book, or if it reinforces the key theme. Mr Bartlett abuses policy makers for their inability to contain spending, and advocates a Value-Added Tax as the next approach for the economic crisis we've borrowed ourselves into. He also beats the "save more, consume less" drum, which depends on an unlikely change in American behavior. The contradictions, of course, are with Keynes' advocacy of meaningful government spending (e.g., NOT tax rebates which are just saved - another contradiction?) and civic consumption to lift the economy out of recession/depression, and the fact that raising taxes in a recession is flat out bad policy. Perhaps, though, this is really saying no more than the 2008/2009/2010 economic crisis is different than - albeit similar to - the Great Depression, and requires a different approach. Mr Bartlett is not clear on this point.
The contradictions of the concluding chapter with the history lesson of the preceding pages left me feeling the book actually said nothing in its 200 pages. As a couple days have passed and I think back on the book, though, the key theme stands out more clearly, warning us of the dangers of turning economic policy into religion, even if the confusion and apparent contradiction of Mr Bartlett's "new way forward" hides it temporarily. "Religion" best describes my perception of today's political "dialog," and this cautionary tale is timely and welcome.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Another " Saul " (libertarian-Austrian ) transforms into "Paul "( J M Keynes ), February 1, 2010
This review is from: The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward (Hardcover)
This book is very similar to R A Posner's recent 2009 book in which Posner decided to sit down and read the General Theory (GT;1936)instead of accepting what various economists claimed Keynes meant.The author is a libertarian-Austrian economist, like Posner ,who decided to actually read what it was that Keynes said in the GT ,as well as in his pre- and post-GT work .The author discovers that,for example,
(a)Keynes was opposed to deficit finance and budget deficits ,in general.Keynes favored "deficits" only for the provision and maintenance of public infrastructure, such as transportation ,seaports,airports,dam -hydroelectric systems,aquifers,reservoirs,etc. All of these projects would pay for themselves in the long run.Constantly updating and modernizing such infrastructure would go a long way towards minimizing the problem of involuntary unemployment.
(b)Keynes was a lifelong opponent of inflation and inflationary finance.However,he never mistook reflation for inflation .
(c)Keynes was opposed to discretionary expansionary and contractionary fiscal(tax cuts) and monetary (open market operations) policies to fine tune the economy over the short run.These policies would simply add to the uncertainty of the future.
(d)Keynes was a follower of conservatives like Adam Smith and Edmund Burke.Burke was one of the first to recognize the systematic and comprehensive nature of Smith's Wealth of Nations(1776). Keynes's last published article ,in the Economic Journal of April,1946,correctly emphasizes the fundamental importance of Smith's entire conservative moral,economic,political,social,and legal system of thought.
(e)Keynes believed in policy rules.
However, all of these conclusions could have been arrived at in the mid-1940's by any economist and /or historian who was familiar with Keynes's published work.The reason why the author did not read the publicly available corpus of Keynes's work is because he was mislead by nonsense written about Keynes by Henry Hazlitt,Ludwig von Mises,Murray Rothbard,F von Hayek,The Freeman magazine,etc.The latest nonsense about Keynes has been published by Hunter Lewis.
I recommend this book.One can compare it with the great number of quotations deliberately taken out of context by Lewis. It should not come as any surprise that Lewis is an ardent libertarian -anarchist follower of Hazlitt,Rothbard,von Mises,etc.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|