Buy New

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
or
Amazon Prime Free Trial required. Sign up when you check out. Learn More
Buy Used
Used - Good See details
$4.61 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
   
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
The New Face of War : Weapons of Mass Destruction & the Revitalization of America's Transoceanic Military Strategy
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I'd like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

The New Face of War : Weapons of Mass Destruction & the Revitalization of America's Transoceanic Military Strategy [Hardcover]

John R. Backschies (Author), Robert W. Chandler (Author, Preface)
4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Price: $33.00 & this item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. Details
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Only 2 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).
Want it delivered Wednesday, February 1? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details

Book Description

October 1998
Rogue regimes and other countries hostile toward the United States are up- gunning their military arsenals with biological and chemical weapons a few with nuclear capabilities advanced conventional weapons and technologies, and ballistic and cruise missiles. These deadly weapons offer weaker non-Western countries new military options for keeping America's superior conventional military forces at bay or striking them with great ferocity when they are within range.

Robert Chandler, a twenty-seven-year Air Force veteran, explains how the dizzying pace of weapons proliferation is changing the face of war and placing America's Cold War-derived military strategy increasingly into jeopardy. Explaining how America's transoceanic power projection strategy is under attack, he recommends a dramatic shift in military strategy and forces to neutralize the growing threat of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

America's response to the Iraqi seizure of Kuwait in 1990 demonstrated the reach and superiority of U.S. military forces, and a dramatic military victory was won with far fewer casualties than expected. At the same time, however, glaring vulnerabilities in the American global strategy were exposed. Two of the most severe weaknesses were the overwhelming dependence of the U.S. transoceanic power projection strategy on time, and lots of it, to deploy military forces overseas, and, secondly, the presumption of always having available ready and unhindered access to regional seaports, airfields, and other facilities. With America's time and access dependencies exposed, contemporary WMD proliferators are working feverishly to exploit these vulnerabilities.

Robert Chandler takes the reader step-by-step through the logic of how WMD proliferation, advanced conventional weapons, and state-sponsored terrorism will make execution of the current U.S. military strategy highly risky and perhaps even unworkable early in the twenty-first century. He recommends that the United States reshape its military strategy to "mass firepower, not forces" through the creation of a Global Reconnaissance-Strike Complex built from existing military resources, ranging from intelligence and communications assets to air forces and distributed ground combat cells. Launching from bases beyond the reach of deadly WMD-tipped missiles, a balanced long-range precision strike force would immunize U.S. strategy against the effects of weapons of mass destruction.


Editorial Reviews

Review

"This is a most comprehensive, complete, and extensive collection of everything that has been written, rumored, said, and seen concerning the proliferation of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. Robert Chandler takes the reader through a very detailed presentation of a U.S. global strategy made ineffective by rogue states and terrorists with access to weapons of mass destruction.... More than a lesson, the book is an education in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction." -- Captain Stuart D. Landersman, U.S. Navy [Retired] in Proceedings [a publication of the U.S. Naval Institute], November 1999

Desert Storm turned out to be the first war against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.... Now we broadly proclaim the proliferation of these weapons is the "gravest" threat to our security that emerged from the Cold War.

Well that is dead wrong! The gravest threat to our national security is our government and its armed services' collective unwillingness to acknowledge this threat and reshape the American military...to meet the challenge posed by these weapons in the wrong hands.... Change is required if we are to create the reforms aimed at invigorating how and with what America fights its wars....The one thing the authors forcefully prove is that the current policy of "no change" must not be an option. The New Face of War... provides solutions that could spell the diference between victory or defeat during the next major world crisis. -- Review by General Charles A. Horner (retired), the Air War Commander in Operation Desert Storm, "Straight Talk About the Current Threats We Face," National Guard Magazine, December 1998

In The New Face [of War], Chandler advances a host of reasons why the US' power-projection strategy is already unrealistic for dealing with the likes of today's Iraq or North Korea. Chief among those reasons is the fact that US strategy hinges on two elements: time, which is necessary to build up forces to counter an enemy offensive; and access, which presupposes the availability of sea ports and airfields to handle the enormous buildup of personnel and materiel required to repulse a formidable enemy's attack...The New Face of War accomplishes what its author sets out to do it presents a convincing case for the need to overhaul the US' warfighting strategy in light of the potential role that heavy bomber forces might play in the initial phases of future conflicts. These are reasons enough why Chandler's message deserves consideration by the US lawmakers.... -- Review by John G. Roos, Editor, "Bombers Vs. Armor: Here's An Interesting Bit Of 'Out-Of-The-Box' Thinking," Armed Forces Journal International, March 1999

From the Publisher

A wide range of activities in the Executive Branch has led to the creation of an anti-strategy a pressure cooker for defense spending that erects a glass ceiling every year that presents an image of the Clinton Administration striving heartily to achieve the needed military capabilities. Yet, the anti-strategy offers decision-makers no sense of the military risks facing the nation. Proponents of budget-based planning have contributed heavily to development of an anti-strategy by using faulty assumptions and wrongly applied analytical tools to keep defense spending within the limits of the politically defined glass ceiling. Acceptance of the glass ceiling takes on the aura of rule of law for many in uniform feeling themselves obliged to support the commander-in-chief, America's military works diligently within the narrow bounds of the budget-based planning system. The trouble is that Congress is often left out in the cold without an appreciation of the military risks facing the country. And those "risk assessments" that are made available by the Pentagon are the understated risks driven by budget-based planning and associated with the make-believe world of the anti-strategy.

This can sometimes lead to bad decisions. The Air Force, for instance, in effect abandoned long- range airpower during the 1997 Quadrennial Defense Review. This turn toward protecting procurement of short-range fighters occurred at the very time when the need for global reach precision bombing emerged as a vital defense requirement to counter weapons of mass destruction and to deny adversaries any realistic chance of keeping U.S. forces from using regional seaports, airfields, and other facilities. Short-range tactical fighters were protected in the Pentagon plan despite the obvious problems of operating from in-theater bases that could become contaminated by biological and chemical attacks. An honest look at long-range precision strike aircraft, however, was conducted by analysts from the Joint Staff, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and Institute for Defense Analyses in support of the Quadrennial Defense Review the results showed that long-range precision strike platforms were more cost-effective than any other force element in the U.S. defense spending plan. Nonetheless, the study's conclusions were deemed "politically incorrect" since they would lead to force structure choices that would be contrary to the views expressed by President Bill Clinton and Defense Secretary William Cohen. Trashed in the dark of night, the study results never saw the light of day. The anti-strategy had won one of its greatest victories by keeping the truth from members of Congress and the public the fact that "...very small numbers of B-2s could potentially replace large groups of planned and thus preferred forces (such as the entire B-1B fleet). And the cost of those B-2s was substantially less than the forces they were replacing" (Brent Scowcroft and others, Final Report of the Independent Bomber Force Review Commission, presented to The Honorable Duncan Hunter, Chairman, Military Procurement Subcommittee of the Committee on National Security, U.S. House of Representatives (July 23, 1997), pp. 19-22). Accepting politically-defined solutions to threats to the nation's interests, while allowing the military risks to go unrecognized and unanswered, is a classic picture of a declining global power.

Andrew Marshall, director of the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, warns that the early lead by the United States in the post-Cold War era, while the world is midway through a military revolution, is no guarantee of remaining on top. "Countries that have very good positions can lose them very rapidly," Mr. Marshall explains. "The British are an example" (Thomas E. Ricks, "How Wars Are Fought Will Change Radically, Pentagon Planner Says" Wall Street Journal (July 5, 1994), p. A1).


Product Details

  • Hardcover: 465 pages
  • Publisher: Amcoda Press (October 1998)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0965077020
  • ISBN-13: 978-0965077026
  • Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.5 x 1.6 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,461,600 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Robert Chandler was the first to reveal in September 2008 that the Presidential candidate Barack Obama's promise to transform America would be satisfied through a series of anti-capitalist, socialist initiatives. In Chapters 6-9 of SHADOW WORLD he details the stealth subversion of of America that would place a member of the Radical Left into the White House. His analysis identifies the individuals and institutions from the extremist progressive-socialist-marxist Left that carried Mr. Obama into the higest position in the United States.

In order to gather information for this analysis, Chandler went inside the Radical Left for eight years to gather data necessary to write "The Global New Left" section (Chapts 6-9) of SHADOW WORLD. He attended a multitude of socialist, Marxist, and Communist planning sessions, conferences, teach-ins, banquets, and and other forums to learn about the rebirth of a new 21st Marxism in the post-Soviet world. He interviewed hundreds of radicals at anti-globalization and anti-war protests while taking hundreds of photos.

This primary research led him to conclude on pages 357-58 in SHADOW WORLD that "in the real world, Barack Obama is a progressive-socialist-marxist soldier hiding inside a Trojan Horse . . . [he will] open America's gates to a horde of socialists, Marxists, and assorted Communists intent on swarming the federal government and carrying out . . . an extended political dominance over the entire country. They will seek to 'Marxize' America."

The writer's analytical skills about "Resurgent Russia" and "Radical Islam" were developed and polished over his 27 years in the U.S. Air Force, including 15 years as a strategist and planner at the highest levels of the Federal Government.

 

Customer Reviews

2 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Civilians please read!, December 30, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: The New Face of War : Weapons of Mass Destruction & the Revitalization of America's Transoceanic Military Strategy (Hardcover)
Not only does this book inform the uninitated on asymmetric threats and the CBRN threat, even non-military types will quickly recognize the obvious conclusion that the force structure of todays military represents a continuing fatal error in policy. Bluntly, the US without exception prepares for the conflicts of the past instead of the future (with too much empthasis on big ticket boondoggles instead of quality equipment where it counts). This book presents a wealth of information as well provoking opnions on future national security issues, not surprisingly from the US Naval Institute Press, who first gave us Clancy.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4.0 out of 5 stars You don't have to be military to read this, July 9, 2002
By 
Hooman Kazemi (Los Angeles, CA United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The New Face of War : Weapons of Mass Destruction & the Revitalization of America's Transoceanic Military Strategy (Hardcover)
The main focus of this book is to inform the reader of how U.S. military strategy has remained unchanged in "the new face of war." Old military strategy, new different type of war. Can be broken down into two interrelated parts: 1) U.S. military strategy is based on the assumption that there will be foreign ports available from which military operations can be deployed (mainly in Saudi Arabia). 2) New threats to the U.S. and deployed U.S. military personnel have developed (Chemical, Biological, Nuclear, and Radiological weapons). The two are discussed separately and together (how those new weapons can be used to effectively disrupt/delay deployment of troops through their use on Saudi ports used for deployment).

Robert Chandler does a good job of convincing the reader that the threats he discusses are both real and credible. Highly recommended by someone with no military background.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Only search this product's reviews



Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(1)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Create a Listmania! list

So You'd Like to...


Create a guide


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject