New Jersey's Multiple Municipal Madness [Paperback]

Alan Karcher (Author)

Product Details

• Paperback: 254 pages
• Publisher: Rutgers University Press (October 1, 1998)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0813525667
• ISBN-13: 978-0813525662
• Product Dimensions: 9.3 x 6.2 x 0.6 inches
• Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #314,121 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars New Jersey's Quirkiness Explained, January 10, 2000

By 

Jon Shure (Ewing, NJ) - See all my reviews

This review is from: New Jersey's Multiple Municipal Madness (Paperback)

When Alan Karcher was the Speaker of the NJ General Assembly he never shied away from controversy. He was one of the more outspoken politicians ever in the state. That comes out clearly in his book about how and why New Jersey became a state with 566 municipalities. There are far too many and they are far too small for New Jersey to be a place that is governed efficiently. One of the results is that in return for our penchant for "home rule" we pay the highest local property taxes in the US. Karcher's look into the history of how this happened is enchanting. He tells us that the boundaries were drawn by people long dead for reasons no longer valid. And in all too many cases the reasons had less to do with logic than with keeping "undesirables" out of a particular town or settling often selfish political disputes. He tells us, for example, that Florham Park came about because a couple whose first names were Florence and Hamilton (hence the name) wanted to pay lower taxes; and that Victory Gardens was created because another town didn't want as residents the African Americans who came to New Jersey to work in an ordnance factory in World War Two. The history is reason enough to read this book but Karcher didn't stop there. He offered his own bold plan for how to rectify this mess. Don't look for the Legislature to pass it any time soon, but do read and enjoy. Unfortunately, the author died in the summer of 1999. He left behind a rich career of political activism and a book that one wishes were fiction but is not.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Exposé of Political History, August 11, 2006

By 

Acute Observer (By the Shore NJ) - See all my reviews

This review is from: New Jersey's Multiple Municipal Madness (Paperback)

The title is question-begging. The "madness" is the result of subdivision of governments by and for the people of New Jersey in order to attain a political goal. The 'Introduction' says municipal boundaries were drawn for personal and economic reasons. The 'Index' does not contain the entry "Company Town", even though it is mentioned in the text (as in Helmetta). Karcher does not mention how the 13 counties in 1776 became 21 counties in the 20th century. This was done for the right reasons: the people voted for it. In other states counties were created as the population increased so as to keep a manageable area. (Laura Ingalls Wilder mentions this in one of her books.) Claiming that 200 of the municipalities have small tax bases also ignores why that was not a problem under the 1844 NJ Constitution (p.4). Chapter 1 concludes with the 8 reasons they created municipalities. Karcher avoids the policies of NJ's power elite, such as the lack of Initiative & Referendum, the 1947 Constitution, etc. Any law to allow solving the problems would require a constitutional change (as in "mortmain" Chapter 2). The example of New York City as over-consolidation is due to its power elite's wish to have the greatest population in the country (p.18). Why would anyone want this for any state?

Chapter 3 explains how one large township is now nine separate municipalities. Sectional conflicts created Monroe Township (p.21). Taxes also caused conflicts (p.23). When the War Department prohibited alcohol in townships, Sayreville changed to a "borough" (p.31). Chapter 4 tells how Shrewsbury Township became 75 separate towns. Some municipalities originated from private real-estate developments (Spring Lake, Deal). Sectional conflicts, alcohol prohibition, and local school control led to this fragmentation. 'Part II' goes into more detail on issues that caused fragmentation. [Are these unique to NJ?] 'Part III' discusses the factors that prevented consolidation of the largest cities. The New England rule was to base governments on townships; in most other states it was based on counties (with multiple small villages). Karcher's envy of Connecticut and Rhode Island is not explained (p.137). The "bias" was to choose an agrarian society over an urban society (p.138). Was that for lower costs? The state law limiting the amount that a town can borrow is correct (p.139). Can we trust a politician like Alexander Hamilton (p.140)? Karcher blames the politicians on page 144, but don't they just act for the power elite? Chapter 13 provides a post-mortem on the city of Camden (pp.160-162). Chapter 14 lists the missed opportunities of Newark on pages 175-176. Chapter 15 tells the problems of Jersey City (pp.189-190). [Could the power elite have take a bribe to cripple Jersey City?]

'Part IV' asks about correcting past mistakes. Karcher lists the advantages of local municipal government: more accountable, more responsive, allows more political power, a sense of place, testing for aspiring leaders (p.202). Chapter 17 has the 'Reasons for Change'. Suburban shopping and office malls were designed by Big Oil to sell automobiles and gasoline. They could be limited to locations along public transportation lines (buses not trolleys). They could be required to provide for housing as well as parking spaces. Suggested solutions are in Chapter 18. Karcher believes NJ should have about 200 municipalities having over 40,000 people, but doesn't explain what the trade-offs would be. Perhaps Karcher's hidden agenda is on page 217: privatization of local services! Forcing people to pay more for these services is not a solution for high costs. A ruling elite that controls the political party machines will do nothing that lessens their power, money, and control. Can reshuffling the townships eliminate the graft and corruption found in the power elite? If not, where's the cure?

What I learned from this book is that most of NJ's problems were caused by state government and its ruling class. Those who benefit from these oppressive policies will not correct them.
Nobody should assume that everything in this book is The Truth. Consolidation will NOT solve the problems of high property taxes which was caused by the 1947 Constitution by design ("assessed value" replaced "true value"). Florham Park was created for lower property taxes. Why doesn't this work today?
Delaware has 853 thousand people in 57 municipalities and 3 counties (1,954 sq miles). New Jersey has 8,725 thousand people in 566 municipalities and 21 counties (7,407 sq miles). Karcher's claim about the number of municipalities is thus proven false and dishonest.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars 3M + Money, September 19, 2003

By A Customer

This review is from: New Jersey's Multiple Municipal Madness (Paperback)

The book has great revelance for all concerned residents of the Garden State. The author traces the forces that brought forth the creation of 566 local towns,the cost of running so many political subdivisions, how local governments are maintained (through elevated property taxes and sprawl/ratables race)and makes a great case for changing this political system.

The book is a fanastic blend of history, political intrigue and candid insights about institutionalized housing and employment discrimination against African-American, the poor, and now-families with school aged children.

The author even is so bold as to take on the notion of Home Rule. Showing that it is more of a "political" huddle (set up by special interest groups) rather than a real "legal" impediment to change. The author also attacks the "entrenched system" for allowing public officials to hold multiple political offices at once.

Overall this is an outstanding work by someone truly concerned with the future of his state.