The New Perspective on Paul [Paperback]

James D. G. Dunn (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: November 2007

This collection of essays highlights a dimension of Pauls theology of justification which has been rather neglected in earlier decades, specifically that his teaching emerged as an integral part of his understanding of his commission to preach the gospel to non-Jews and that his dismissal of justification by works of the law was directed not so much against Jewish legalism but rather against his fellow Jews assumption that the law remained a dividing wall separating Christian Jews from Christian Gentiles. The long opening essay interacts with critiques of this new perspective on Paul. Dunn seeks to carry forward the debate on Jewish soteriology, on the relation of justification by faith to judgment according to works, on Christian fulfillment of the law, and on the crucial role of Christ, his death and resurrection. Full of detail and intriguing thought, Dunns collection will make brilliant reading for any scholar of the New Testament.

Product Details

• Paperback: 539 pages
• Publisher: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company; Revised edition (November 2007)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0802845622
• ISBN-13: 978-0802845627
• Product Dimensions: 8.8 x 5.9 x 1.2 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1.6 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #596,643 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Starting Point, October 7, 2010

By 

Reader - See all my reviews

This review is from: The New Perspective on Paul (Paperback)

This text consists of a collection of essays written by Dunn on the subject of the New Perspective on Paul (NPP). For those unfamiliar with the author, Dunn is an eminent New Testament (NT) scholar and one of the leading voices in the NPP discussion.

While Dunn is credited with coining the NPP term, and is arguably its best known advocate, the roots of the new perspective can be traced at least as far back as Krister Stendahl's 1963 paper 'The Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West' and most notably to E.P. Sanders' 1977 book `Paul and Palestinian Judaism.' While it has many variants, at its core, the NPP is concerned with challenging the classic Reformation view of Second Temple Judaism as a legalistic works based religion. Dunn's primary contention is that the perception of a radical discontinuity between Judaism and Christianity on the issues of grace and salvation is over stated. Following Sanders, Dunn argues that pre-Christian Judaism possessed a grace-based view of salvation. In making this contention Pauline expressions such as `works of the law' are interpreted as being primarily concerned with community boundary marking and covenant keeping rather than implying meritorious works of salvation.

The NPP debate is generally understood to have sanded the edges off the view of Second Temple Judaism as a rigidly works-based and legalistic religion. On a more contentious note, however, it has also, at times been perceived as an attack on the classic Protestant view of salvation by faith alone, and advocating a more holistic (faith & works) Orthodox/Catholic view of salvation. This latter point has prompted many responses. The best overall scholarly response to the NPP may be the 2-volume `Justification and Variegated Nomism' published by Baker Academic. A quick introduction to NPP criticisms is also accessible in a series of audio lectures by Don Carson available through the Reformed Theological Seminary. Dunn's opening essay (last chronologically) is a brief response to his key critics.

As an earlier reviewer notes there is some overlap between the essays in this collection. That said, I did not find it to be a major drawback, having read through the full collection I feel that I have a solid appreciation for Dunn's views on this issue. Readers may find that reading the essays in chronological order a profitable approach. Overall this is an excellent anthology of essays on an important contemporary issue in Christian theology. I recommend it to all students of the NT.

10 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Thought Provoking & a must for any student of Paul, July 2, 2010

By 

Joshua Smith (Australia) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The New Perspective on Paul (Paperback)

I found this book very interesting indeed. It is a combination of articles and conference papers that Dunn has written since his reading of Sander's take on Judaism. Some of the articles do cross over a little which in fairness is to be expected, but it is interesting tracing Dunn's Pauline theology over the years. I would have to say this has been the toughest book for me to take in theologically as my thinking has been so permeated with the Lutheran perspective on 'works of the law'. Since reading I must confess this book has converted me to an NPP position. His arguments are logical and evidenced by so much background information. Love or hate the NPP it is worth looking into. Do not just throw away this ideal because it contains the word 'new' (as I almost did before reading on). I still hold that elements of Judaism were legalistic and lost the laws focus (dietary and Sabbath laws particularly shown by Christ Himself) but not to the extent that Luther perceived. As the NPP shows, such inventions were created as 'boundary markers' to push back the tide of Gentile cultural influence and hold true to their Jewish nationality (and not make the same mistakes as were done in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah).