40 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Long overdue update of classic tournament book, February 3, 2009
This review is from: New York 1924 (Paperback)
Older editions continued to use English notation, which has fallen into disuse and which many players today cannot even understand. This edition translates Alekhine's great tournament book into algebraic notation for modern players. So far I have not found a flaw in the transcription.
The production values are great. Nice tight binding, heavy paper cover, bright white paper, double-column format, enough margin to make the part of the text near the binding easily visible without creasing the book.
The tournament itself had 11 players in a double round-robin, with 3 World Champions, 3 who played for the title, and 5 other strong players. 7 of the top 10 players in the world at the time took part. The games are high-quality and fascinating, partly because in the age before opening analysis that ran 25 moves deep, these players reach a wider variety of positions with more options than seen in many modern tournaments.
Alekhine's annotations and text are, naturally, highly instructive and insightful. He mixes textual comments and variations naturally and easily. He delves into variations 5 or 7 moves deep when looking at highly tactical positions, and makes verbal comments about the nature of the position in maneuvering games. Interestingly, the computer software Rybka 3.0 agrees with all the evaluations checked except one, where a clear _computer move_ changes the evaluation from a +3 win to a +4 win. Alekhine's judgment holds up to the best computer analysis.
A summary of the openings used in the tournament caps the book. Many of the comments, especially for the Ruy Lopez and Queen's Gambit, remain highly relevant today, and explain issues that today's books take for granted and may leave unexplained.
Overall, a great game collection and the best until Bronstein's Zurich 1953.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Wonderful Kindle version., April 6, 2010
I already have an older descriptive and more recent figurine algebraic paper versions and the Kindle version is pretty good. It is clear and understandable. The formatting does not seem to be a problem here. It is fairly easy to go to different chapters. For a Kindle book, this is as good as it gets.
I already like the book and found the notes to be very good and still relevant. Compared with the Dover reprints, it is easier to go through the notes with the Kindle version. But compared with the newer figurine algebraic version, the Kindle version, is for this old chess player not as intuitive as an old fashioned book. Although it is easy to go from chapter to chapter (round to round), it is not as easy to go to an individual game as it is in the paper versions.
A serious student of the game will find the focus of going through the games most useful. But the player more focused on a more casual approach will find this restricting. This does not bother me as I like having chess books taking up as little space as a Kindle.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Alekhine on Lasker's Brilliance, July 21, 2009
This review is from: New York 1924 (Paperback)
This is an historic tournament the book communicates the atmosphere well.
Best of all for me is going through Emanuel Lasker's phenomenal games he demonstrates how to win at chess and how to hold tough draws like against his namesake Edward Lasker, all annotated by Alekhine who was at this time trying to understand the chess of Capablanca and Lasker o bring his own chess to a new level.
I am lucky enough to have an 80 year old first edition but this is great book made easy to read.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No