Edited by John W. Wright.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
The index alone is 29 pages long. A glance at the P's illustrates the extraordinary scope of this almanac. A small sample includes Pittsburgh, Pa. (with population statistics, climate, crime, government, rents, and Web sites), Planets (glossary, characteristics, visibility, and 1998 to 1999 discoveries), Plate tectonics theory, Pledge of Allegiance, and Poetry (with Pulitzer Prize, Bollingen Prize, and National Book Awards), as well as Poland (with area codes, economy, geography, government, etc.), Polar regions, Political action committees, and James K. Polk. There are 65 entries under Population, plus entries for Poverty, Presidential elections and administrations, Prisons, Professional sports, Public schools, Purchasing power of the dollar, and Purim.
In topic range and quality of reporting, the Times Almanac outshines its competitors. It likewise surpasses them in usefulness and sheer quantity of detail. Though the print is small and the pages are thin, the Times 2000 Almanac will no doubt become the reference standard for researchers and writers, students and professionals who require easy access to abundant and accurate information. --Stephanie Gold --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
30 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not what they advertise it to be...,
By A Customer
This review is from: The New York Times Almanac 1998: The World's Most Comprehensive and Authoritative Almanac (Reference) (Mass Market Paperback)
This year I purchased the "New York Times Almanac," rather that "The World Almanac," which I purchase every year. What a disappointment. On the cover they claim it's "the world's most comprehensive almanac," but it doesn't have half the information that "The World Almanac" does. I've learned from my mistake. I buy an almanac so I can have all the information I need in one place. To my mind, an incomplete almanac like this one is a waste of money.
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Better off with the World Almanac and Book of Facts,
By Lisa "Page Designer" (Wayne, NJ United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The New York Times Almanac 2001 (Paperback)
Not a BAD reference book, but doesn't seem to have nearly as much info as the World Almanac.
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not as up to date,
By J. Springer (New York, NY) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The New York Times Almanac 2000 (Reference) (Paperback)
I enjoy these types of almanacs a great deal but I was disappointed with the New York Times' offering. It uses information that doesn't seem as current as information in the "World Almanac" for instance. I also found it a bit disorganized.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|