Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
From the perspective of a tourist,
By Gagewyn (United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Nickel and Dimed On (Not) Getting By in America (Paperback)
Nickeled and Dimed has an interesting premise: an upper middle class woman tries to live on wages of an unskilled jobs in three different locations in the US. Here Ehrenreich describes her experiences doing just that and tries to relate these experiences to a larger frame of reference by laying out statistics about the US.
From having done this and that over the summers while in college and having spent the past year earning 3.85/hour plus room and board I can sort of compare my experiences in accessing Ehrenreich's book. Two things that made Ehrenreich's experiences harder than they probably would be for a person who was living the life that she was trying to visit are that she moved around frequently and she wasn't as frugal a shopper as she could have been. The moving around means that she was always starting fresh. From my experience after about 2 months in a city I know where to go for this and that and my expenses drop. Also she wasn't the most frugal person. When she had to get khaki pants on short notice for a waitressing job, she spent 40$ on pants with a stain from a discount store. In Florida (the same state) at about the same time I had to get khaki pants on short notice and found them for 15$. I'm kind if fat and so there was less of a selection for me than for someone in a more common size. I doubt that normal people in such jobs would spend 40$ on pants. 15$ felt like alot to me. From Ehrenreich's description she didn't bat an eye at 40$ Ehrenrich's descriptions of co-worker's plights are more realistic. While it isn't so hard to get by at poverty level (unless you get sick like missing work sick) I have trouble imagining how to raise a family on minimum wage. Descriptions of co-workers whose food budget was tiny are common. I kind of wonder how these people felt about being quizzed. I feel that there was too much focus on rent and food. These are big expenses but they are predictable. Once one finds a way to make ends meet that's stable at least. One aspect of being poor that I feel was neglected was the lack of medical care. Insurance coverage is expensive and if it doesn't come with the job then that is a big budgeting item. Also jobs without benefits are the one that pay less. Also the difficulty in getting sit down work if one gets injured is a huge issue. Ehrenreich kind of touches on these with statistics and concern for a co-worker with a sprained ankle respectively, but she spends most of her time discussing how the nations poor can't buy food or make rent and trying to make poverty an immediate life or death issue. For me poverty is about not having a safety net. When I was working for 3.85 and room and board (no benefits at all) I had a co-worker with higher pay use this book to explain how easy I had it. At the time I was trying to scrape together enough for a dental visit and pay some work related expenses. (I had switched jobs and underestimated the fees for work related training and equipment.) She was angry that I was having trouble getting cash together because that reflected badly on the company. Which brings me to a point: Everyday you are in contact with someone who is living at poverty level. Because they shower and know how to get by you may not realize this. The starving limping people Ehrenreich describes aren't common, but that shouldn't be used to undercut the problems faced by poor people who are not in an emergency state right now. It seems to me that many of the people I know who have read this book have strange ideas about the poor to begin with. So if you haven't been poor for a while then don't make this your only source for info about it. I reccommend Nikeled and Dimed, but take it with a grain of salt. Ehrenreich is a tourist of poverty and has a shallow impression not a deep understanding of the issues.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Entertaining reading,
By
This review is from: Nickel & Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America (Hardcover)
Ehrenreich is a good writer; so much so that I could hardly put the book down and finished it in about a day. The book is very entertaining and does a good job describing the hardships faced by the working poor and the dilemmas they face almost every day.
One thing I found annoying, however, was her obvious disdain for white people. Her racism rears its ugly head several times throughout the book. For example, in the chapter "Serving in Florida", she comes down hard on Christians for complaining and not tipping enough. But, when a "middle-aged black couple who complain..." it is "with some justice". At the beginning of the chapter "Scrubbing in Maine", she writes, "what appeared to be an extreme case of demographic albinism..." as if an intact white population represents a disease. Nevertheless, I could not help but notice that Ehrenreich never availed herself of cheap housing within black neighborhoods (in the "hood"). Nowhere in her book does Ehrenreich point out that housing shortages, and high housing costs, are typically the result of government market interventions. Instead, she seems to blame housing problems on the free market. I suppose it wasn't one of the goals of this book to suggest viable solutions to the problems it illustrates. Furthermore, it clearly is not intended as a work of science. So it would not be justified to attack it with statistics or to be over analytical. If it was meant to be entertaining, in that it succeeded.
3.0 out of 5 stars
Disjointed - but worthy of reading,
By AmericanWoman "longtimecookbookaddict" (portland, oregon United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Nickel and Dimed On (Not) Getting By in America (Paperback)
I share the author's politics and her atheism, too...so I don't argue with those things she brought to her writing. But, I'm just a reader and somethings disturbed me about the book; I'm not sure I can put them into words. Her writing seemed strange to me--all over the place. Her stays at each job seemed too short--those tellings were the most interesting, but even they lacked something. And all the rest was dry and very, very boring. I don't disagree with her stories about the people she worked with--I've met all those people, too. I know how hard working and good and even smart many low wage people are...and how hopeless and unrewarding much of the work is. Just... I dunno. If I were going to tell their story, I think I might have put more into my writing and made the book flow more and not split the book up with page after page of data that seemed to ramble all over the place. It felt to me like a college student's paper that needed more guidance from the teacher. Not great. These people need their story told better. We who don't toil at boring, subservient, endless revolving hours/days/weeks/months/years of grossly underpaid and under-appreciated/under-acknowledged work, should learn to better SEE the other side and share in finding real solutions to helping those people we rely upon so much to get fairer benefits/pay/housing, not to mention: some respect.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
