From School Library Journal
Grade 9 Up–As a man of the Church, Copernicus was never aware of the impact of his ideas on the world. After a lifetime of figuring, observing the heavens, and studying classical theories, it was finally mathematics and his quest for an elegant solution that led him to conclude that Earth was a planet orbiting the sun. The era and events in which he lived are chronicled as the authors describe Copernicus's life and efforts to explain the rotation of the planets. However, the detailed descriptions of his process and the explanations of theories are difficult, and it might take readers with an advanced degree in mathematics to understand the specifics. Numerous diagrams illustrate the concepts; additional art includes woodcuts, details from period books and paintings, and photographs. All are helpful and appropriate, but unsourced. Also, the narrative flow suffers when five titled sidebars have nothing more than a border to distinguish them from the main text; the instructions to proceed to nonsequential pages are frustrating. For students seriously interested in astronomy and how Copernicus solved the riddle of the heavens, this is a valuable resource. For those wanting an overview, this book is too complex.
–Janet S. Thompson, Chicago Public Library Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Gr. 9-12. This Oxford Portraits in Science biography, cowritten by frequent series contributor MacLachlan and astronomer Gingerich (who wrote about Copernicus for adults in
The Book Nobody Read, 2003), offers an unusually authoritative view of the amateur astronomer who dared to imagine the earth revolving around the sun. The narrative first describes the era's accepted ideas about the heavens and how Copernicus came to disagree with them; closing chapters highlight why the publication of his theories in 1543 might be considered "the quietest revolution in history." Unmotivated readers may balk at the drab presentation, and the technical sidebars will probably require more than the "minute or two of thought" conceded by the coauthors. In the end, though, what will stay with readers is the insightful perspective on an era in science history when planets were assumed to be embedded in crystalline spheres and scholars struggled poignantly to explain inconsistencies in the earth-centric paradigm. A time line and lists of book and Web resources are appended, though endnotes would have made this an even stronger resource.
Jennifer MattsonCopyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved