Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
19 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Ingenious reformulation of Nietzsche's key ideas, April 23, 2001
Nietzsche's "aestheticist" turn, in Alexander Nehamas's ingenious exposition, is twofold. First, he interpreted the entire world as an enormous literary text. Secondly, he was preoccupied by creating, through the medium of his texts, a specific personality, which as Nehamas contends, was Nietzsche himself. He argues that Nietzsche's key ideas, such as the will to power, nihilism, his view of truth, his ideas on cruelty, the overman and the dreadful doctrine of the eternal recurrence (which Nehamas interprets as a psychological, as opposed to cosmological, conception) were all fused into Nietzsche's aestheticist model of "self-creation". In a move of apocalyptic boldness, Nehamas claims that the figure of the overman which Nietzsche held in such high regard, was actually Nietzsche himself as he fashioned himself through his texts, a unique individual who affirmed the sum-total of life, which includes, of course, the suffering entailed in living. The literary analogues that Nehamas uses to illustrate Nietzsche's fundamental concepts are highly illuminating. Above all, Nehamas implies that theoretical knowledge is empty compared to the radical philosophy pursued by Nietzsche, which resulted in a synthetic merging of life with art. This philosophy, combining self-reference with self-creation was why Nietzsche was, and is, "the first Modernist as well as the last Romantic." Along with Walter Kaufmann's "Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Anti-Christ", this book is possibly the best book on Nietzsche available in English.
|
|
|
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Unorthodox Nietsche Commentary, April 20, 2009
Granted, Nehamas' reading of Nietzsche's corpus as a literary 'text,' yields a number of interesting results, particularly in his analysis of Nietzsche's conception of 'How to Become What One Is.' But I wonder just how interested in literature Nehamas really is here-he spends the bulk of this volume discussing Nietzsche's perspectivism (which is an unusually elegant and clear explication) and his distrust of traditional conceptualizations of truth. Yet he wavers on key positions, such as the eternal return and will to power. Nehamas fails to push the perspective of Zarathustra as a literary creation far enough. Nietzsche's positive reevaluation of all values lies in the possibility of artistic creation as an overcoming of nihilism. His analysis degenerates into uninteresting snobbery in the section on Beyond Good and Evil where he describes Nietzsche as a 'monstrosity,' and 'vague.' This is simply the inability on Nehamas' part to unify the thoughts of a thinker whose work so consistently resists unification.
|
|
|
8 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Deep, and reads like a mistery novel, September 5, 2000
I am not a philosopher by training, but have read some of the classics in the field by sheer enjoyment, some Plato, some Aristotle, others also. But none impressed me more than Nietzsche, from whose opera I have savored many books: Genealogy of Morals (fantastic), Zarathustra (enigmatic), Antichrist (outraging), Twilight of the Idols, Ecce Homo, Birth of Tragedy, Beyond Good and Evil (don't die without reading this; if you don't read German, try Walter Kaufman's translations), and some parts of Dawn, Gay Science and Human-all-too-Human. I also read a couple of biographies. FN was a profound thinker, one of the most brilliant of all time, IMHO. And he was also a sad, lonely and pathetic man, a kind of Van Gogh in Philosophy. And this turns him also into an exceedingly interesting character. The central thesis of Nehamas book is that FN tried to build a character out of himself through his multi-style books. This character, a "free spirit", a "philosopher" in a very particular sense, or the übermensch if you will, is the common voice behind the many different literary styles he used, from the academic to the poetic to the prophetic. Nehamas wrote a very interesting book. I enjoyed it a lot and I thank him for giving me a new and surprising perspective on one of my preferred authors. And his prose does not lack a touch of drama, which is adequate to his subject, but is also unexpected in a technical book about modern philosophy. I recommend Nehamas strongly to anyone interested in Nietzsche.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|