As an overall read on night photography, it gets 5 stars. As a reference or "how-to" it gets 3 stars. So I rated it at 4 stars.
After reading the first few pages, I found myself thinking "Man, it's night photography, not some mystical, soul-seeking walk-about into the mysteries of the dark side of humankind."
Most books have a single paragraph dedication. The author manages to stretch it to 20 pages with a forward, acknowledgments, biographies, and introduction. Save all the self promotion and congratulations for the back of the book. Between that and some of the other reviews here, one really has the impression that there's a small hard-core community out there that spends way too much time out in the dark :)
When I see a book on photography - any type of photography - I expect to see EVERY photo include a table of settings and a description, enabling the reader to replicate the effect. Too many are just eye candy - no explanation whatsoever. Many have just partial information, for example, just a camera make and f-stop - almost as if they were trying to hide how it was done.
26 pages on the history of night photography, while interesting, could have been compacted down to 5 pages, and the rest used for more practical examples. The author also clearly prefers film to digital, even going as far as stating that digital is better to preview the shot, and film to capture it. That's a personal opinion, not a fact. It all depends on the digital camera resolution / sensor size, and film camera model and film format / size. Then, strangely enough, he dedicates most of the book to digital photography.
The chapter on equipment was well done, and had some great suggestions. Again, a little too much time was spent on trivialities. The history of Canon vs Nikon autofocus, for example.
The basics chapter was one of the best in the book. But I still have to nit-pick. Lots of example photographs. Almost none had shooting details. Where most people would simply state that the photographer should be aware of moon position and fullness, to check the weather, and watch for events, such as meteor showers or eclipses, the author has to go all mystical on us. It's "understanding and awareness of the lunar cycle" and "heightened awareness." I suppose that's just his style, but it becomes overpowering after awhile. Occasionally the author seems to forget he already made a point, so repeats it later. For example, one paragraph begins with an explanation of flashlight use, including details on it being a focusing aid. The same paragraph ends with an explanation that flashlights also aid in focusing. The editor should have fixed these annoyances.
I quickly skimmed the 28 pages on film photography. I stopped using film 10 years ago.
There were 25 pages for digital photography, with a plethora of information. The real meat came in the next chapter, "Workflow" - it was much more than just workflow. Plenty of examples - but it's all Lightroom. If you don't own Lightroom, it cam be a "here's how it's done in software you don't own" example - figure it out for your software. Personally, I think the chapter should have given the same examples in Lightroom AND PhotoShop AND Adobe Bridge.
The chapter on HDR was decent enough, but entirely based once again in Lightroom. TONS of photos. Not a single one had details.
The Moonlight and Star trails chapter was also a great read, but again, all Lightroom. By this time I was getting the feeling that the author really did not like (or know how to use) PhotoShop.
Painting With Light was interesting, but again there were a lot of photos, all without details.
My overall impression is that the book was put together as much as a showcase for cool photos as a reference. If you're looking for a "how-to" step-by-step guide, you'll be disappointed. You'll see plenty of examples but few details.
If you're a digital photographer and don't own Lightroom, you'll still walk away with some new ideas, but will leave wondering why they did not provide the examples for Bridge or PhotoShop. I don't think the author decided on an audience before planning the book. He'll start an area by covering some obvious basics, then assume you can figure out the more advanced stuff for yourself. Others are the opposite. After reading the book (for the 2nd time) I still came away with the feeling it was unfinished with no specific audience.
So who can benefit from reading the book? Anyone interested in an overall picture (pun intended) of night shooting. You'll walk away with plenty of new ideas, some inspiration, and techniques. Just don't expect any hand-holding - unless you use LightRoom.
As an aside, the book is beautifully produced - it's coffee-table book quality with brilliant colors and heavy, high-quality paper.