Customer Reviews


12 Reviews
5 star:
 (7)
4 star:    (0)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


37 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars just what was promised
small enough for a pocket, light weight, good close up capabilities. good clear shots with or without date on photo.
don't be fooled by the 'panorama' feature. it's not a panoramic camera. you don't get those long photos.. overall, just what we were looking for in a portable camera. if you're used to changable lenses on your 35 mm, this is a portable substitute...
Published on September 9, 2001

versus
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars What a disappointment
After owning an Olympus Stylus for 6 years, we decided to "upgrade" to the Nikon 140. Wow, were we surprised at the low quality. The camera ikons blinked inappropriately and the pictures came out worse than I ever imagined. The auto focus feature for up close photos looked like the people were hiding behind clouds.

We are now going to try the Minolta 160...

Published on July 30, 2002


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

37 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars just what was promised, September 9, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
small enough for a pocket, light weight, good close up capabilities. good clear shots with or without date on photo.
don't be fooled by the 'panorama' feature. it's not a panoramic camera. you don't get those long photos.. overall, just what we were looking for in a portable camera. if you're used to changable lenses on your 35 mm, this is a portable substitute for most of your needs.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


34 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars NO RED EYE, November 24, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
I have the Nikon Lite touch Zoom 120 ed AF and it is the best point and shoot I have had in many years. I have a new granddaughter with beautiful eyes and the red eye reduction (which has a solid light prior to flash) really works, not a red eye in any of the photos. It is light weight, very easy to use and the clarity and color of the photos is great. I can not tell you how happy I am with this camera.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


61 of 75 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great little point and shoot, September 4, 2001
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
I haven't tried the camera yet myself, but I did some research on it and wanted to make a comment on the lens. Normally, I prefer point and shoots with lenses that don't exceed 3x, and preferably more like 2x, because with long telephoto range lenses there are just too many optical compromises that must be made, and that affects the sharpness of the lens. However, this lens contains 6 elements in 6 groups, and most importantly, uses plastic aspherical components, a recent innovation in these cameras that is sure to make a difference. The new Minolta Freedom Zoom 125 also has this. I had been considering buying the 120 ED, but depending on the quality of the lens, I may decide to purchase one of these instead. So far I have researched at least 3 dozen different point and shoot cameras, and this one and the 120 ED are in the top 5 out of all the ones I've researched, and I've been pretty thorough in comparing features and performance. One thing I like about the 120, and I'm sure the 140 has it too, is the Panorama mode, which I've enjoyed using in my Fuji Tiara APS camera. Overall, this looks to be a great little camera to take with you anywhere from Nikon, and (along with the 120 ED), is their first important offering in this category.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


39 of 49 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Cross Comparison Nikon, Minolta, Olympus, December 18, 2001
By 
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
My spouse has hinted over the past couple of months wanting a very simple to use camera. In my selection to evaluate, I have chosen Nikon 140, Minolta 150, Olympus 140 for comparison.

In my past life, I spent nearly $2000 on Olympus camera equipment to take personal photos. I sold everything several years later. While I was quite impressed with Olympus quality of product and the durability, it is a camera and needs to be treated as such.

My current assessment is narrowing in on the Nikon 140. The MSRP in this item is $239, and I have recently found this item for $204.00 which is $30-$50 less than Minolta or Olympus.

Nikon has put together a highly durable and simple to use camera, with high quality and definition lenses. I am especially confident that not only will my spouse beable to operate the camera effectively, but will be exceptionally pleased with her ability to take excellent photographs to treasure for years to come.

Now, if Amazon could only stand up to the price.... this would make it a better deal.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars What a disappointment, July 30, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
After owning an Olympus Stylus for 6 years, we decided to "upgrade" to the Nikon 140. Wow, were we surprised at the low quality. The camera ikons blinked inappropriately and the pictures came out worse than I ever imagined. The auto focus feature for up close photos looked like the people were hiding behind clouds.

We are now going to try the Minolta 160. They seem to have more features as well.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars High Quality, Beautiful Design, April 10, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
I am so pleased with my purchase last month. The quality of the pictures is superb, sharp and clean, and what makes me most happy is that finally I have found a camera to eliminate the red eye problem! And everything in so elegant design.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


10 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Happy but disappointed at the same time, June 11, 2002
By A Customer
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
I bought this Nikon 140ED as a graduation gift for my cousin. The camera is nice and light. Pictures come out nice and clear. It doesn't come with a camera bag, which is rather inconvenient, but that is trivial. Overall, I'm minutely satisfied with the camera. However, I do have a couple disappointments. It doesn't take multiple shots that well. We tried to take 2 or three pictures one after the other, and nothing happens. The camera refuses to take a second picture. We try waiting several seconds, but it is still unresponsive. Another feature of the camera that disappointed me is the flash. The distance of the flash is not as great as I expected it to be. ... For the NIKON name and quality, and that price, the camera usability and flash should exceed those of lesser brands and quality.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars I would never buy a nikon again, July 6, 2003
By 
George Strauch (apple valley, Mn United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
13 months after I purchased this camera, it froze up.
Would cost $147 to repair. The manuel suggest a new a battery,
which didnt do any good. Camera was never dropped or mis-
handled. When it was working it took great pictures. But 13
months!!!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Good Camera, January 26, 2003
By 
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
I bought this camera about two years ago whe it was first out .... However the cool design and quality photos have helped me not be upset with the purchase. I drove cross country and backpacked europe and never lost a picture do to the camera. I dropped it once from about four feet onto blacktop and no problems but a little nick and the sand from cannon beach has still not given me problems. This is a very good camera and i would recommend trying nikon out.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Piece of Junk, December 13, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera (Electronics)
Had the camera for 6 months. Already has needed to be repaired twice. Repairs take over a month. Poor camera. Poor company.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 | Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product

Nikon Lite Touch 140 ED/QD Zoom Date 35mm Camera
Used & New from: $29.50
Add to wishlist See buying options