Ninety-Eight Days: Geographers View Vicksburg Campaign [Hardcover]

Warren E. Grabau (Author)

Product Details

• Hardcover: 680 pages
• Publisher: Univ Tennessee Press; 1st edition (August 30, 2000)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1572330686
• ISBN-13: 978-1572330689
• Product Dimensions: 9.5 x 6.6 x 2.1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 2.9 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (10 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #846,319 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

36 of 36 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Logistics, logistics, logistics!, October 9, 2000

By 

William C. Callahan "Bill Callahan" (Sunnyvale, CA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Ninety-Eight Days: Geographers View Vicksburg Campaign (Hardcover)

Why does virtually every military college from Sandhurst to West Point still study U.S. Grant's Vicksburg Campaign of 1863? In the spring of 1998 I was fortunate enough to participate in a three-day guided tour of the Vicksburg Campaign conducted by Warren Grabau. He began the process by raising that question and providing the succinct answer: "logistics." As the author points out in his closing remarks, there is a widely accepted aphorism in military circles that says "amateurs study tactics, professionals study logistics." And the subject of logistics lies at the heart of this work. Logistics are the key, from Grant's preparations to move down the west bank of the Mississippi, through his close coordination with Admiral Porter to create an unprecedented joint Army-Navy operation, to his extended operations from Bruinsburg to the final investment of fortress Vicksburg. This work presents this story, masterfully mixed with analysis and explanation of the importance of the terrain, the commanders, and factors such as unreliable communications, poor intelligence and uncertain maps. It also included other factors such as social and political effects and even personal vendettas, dislikes or personality flaws among key officers on both sides. The author, a professional geologist who spent most of his career in Vicksburg, then adds in 68 high quality maps. These were painstakingly hand-tailored by the author in an effort to recreate the closest possible approximation of the actual 1863 landscape by combining modern geodesy with the best information sifted from records of the time. Grant or Pemberton would have traded nearly anything in their possession for such maps. The net result is a work that gives a much deeper understanding of the campaign and why the commanders involved made the decisions they did, which heretofore may have seemed baffling or highly questionable. As the author points out in his notes "About the Maps," when the events of the time are played out on this reconstructed game board the "opaque" decisions become "astonishingly transparent." One useful technique employed throughout is the author's presentation of each sequence of development from both the Union and the Confederate perspective. This allows us to see the details and the situation analysis from first one point of view and then from the other which greatly enhances understanding the actions and reactions, moves and countermoves, of the opposing forces and commanders. There is also a generous sprinkling of background information where appropriate explaining specific geographic, geologic or other situational factors as introductions to the Union and Confederate viewpoints. The book is rich in detail, from names of units to commanders and battle details, to the startling statistic that during the static phase of the siege from May 23 to July 4 Grant needed 338 wagons per day just to supply water for his men and horses. Now there's a logistical nightmare without even considering food, ammunition, medical supplies and all the other impedimenta of a military operation. Yet all of this information is conveyed without ever bogging down in minutiae or boring the reader. When we began our tour of Vicksburg in 1998, the author started not in the city or the fortifications, but by taking us across the river to the Milliken's Bend and Young's Point area. The objective was to give us a view and understanding of the terrain and the very subtle natural levees that still exist on the Lousiana shore. This book takes the same unconventional approach to present the fascinating tale of this unique campaign in a fashion you will experience nowhere else. When we completed our tour that spring near the famous Stockade Redan, I thought I had a good understanding of the Vicksburg Campaign from both the Union and Confederate viewpoints. Now that I have read this book, I feel I have expanded that knowledge and understanding to a much deeper level. The collection of information, writing, organization and presentation is in a word, superb.

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Two thumbs up from a non-buff, July 31, 2001

By 

carlos h murillo jr (El Salvador) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Ninety-Eight Days: Geographers View Vicksburg Campaign (Hardcover)

Let me beging by disclosing that I am not a Civil War buff, even though I enjoy history books. I came across this book by accident, when a relative gave it to me as a gift this past Christmas. In the beginning, I wasn't even sure I would like to read it since the subject matter seemed to be very narrow, but a look at the beautiful maps convinced me otherwise.

What I found was close to the best book of military history I have ever read. By keeping the geography of the Vicksburg area as a permanet reference, the reasoning behind the varied strategic decisions of the campaign became very clear. In addition to shedding light on the tactics of this campaign, Grabau is also successful in depicting the larger picture. For example, he argues in a compelling way that the fall of Vicksburg was the decisive turning point of the war (wich came as a surprise to an unnitiated like me, who thought Gettysburg was much more important).

In my opinion, where this book truly excells is in the minute details of the war: The actions of the Generals involved in the campaign, their day-to-day pressures, the lives of the soldiers, and the ever-present Mississippi soil combine to form a vivid picture of the war and the combatants. Furthermore, in very few other tomes have I seen a clearer depiction of the roles of the traditional branches of an army, from naval support, to artillery, cavalry, infantry, and logistics.

This book was an enlightening and surprisingly joyful read. I sincerely recommend it even to those with a more than a passing interest in military history.

13 of 14 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A view from the field, July 15, 2001

By 

Mark Mills (Glen Rose, TX USA) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE)    (REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Ninety-Eight Days: Geographers View Vicksburg Campaign (Hardcover)

Great book. I have a few reservations, but it is an excellent effort on a subject that deserves far more public attention. For those with serious interest, there are 521 juicy pages of text and 166 pages of maps, notes and index. There is plenty to chew on, but I suspect it's a bit more than the new-comer might be ready to try.

My main reservation is the thumb-nail personality portraits. In brief, the Confederates don't do very well. The Federalist commanders are all portrayed as above average, even the bumbling political-general McClernand seems more than adequate. Grant is a friendly genius. The Federals have nothing on their mind but following orders. On the other hand, the Confederate commanders are clueless, from the commander of Vicksburg up to Robert E. Lee. I say clueless in a literal way. Grant and his staff are constantly making great use of intelligence. The Confederates are portrayed as somewhat content to be deluded, particularly Pemberton, Johnson and Lee. In fact, the author makes an all too brief argument that Lee insured loss of the war by refusing to assist Vicksburg when asked by Davis during meetings held between May 14-16, 1863 (prior to starting off to the disaster at Gettysburg).

With this minor issue out of the way, I have nothing but admiration for the book. It is not really a 'day by day' account, but comes very close. The narrative is told from the perspective of the field commander at the moment of decision. If a decision was made on muddy roads while a generaly dry creek is in flood, you know about it. You even get a geological description of the mud's clay content and hence can estimate how far a loaded wagon will sink into a puddle.

Each chapter covers between a few hours to a few weeks. About half of each chapter describes what the Federals knew and did, then switches to the Confederate knowledge/actions. This presentation style is a bit difficult to follow, but allows the author a wonderful framework for engaging us in his well thought out conclusions on command decisions, moment by moment.

I was very impressed by the author's ability to describe the importance of intelligence. The day by day descriptions of 'what was known' makes the course of events a great deal more sensible than other narratives. Additionally, it helps to know the current weather/road conditions, including probable travel speeds for horse or marching infantry.

The detail and scope of the book are astounding. Not only are there detailed topographic maps of key sites, but the author includes descriptions of every distant event that might bear on the campaign. The Banks campaign against Alexandria, the famous Mississippi calvary raid by Grierson, and the well know capture of Streight's raiders by Forrest all get woven into the tapestry of events better than any other history I've read.

The causal web drawn by the author are based on his conviction that the loss of Vicksburg determined the outcome of the war. This is perhaps a minority view. I happen to believe strongly with the author regarding the importance of Vicksburg and greatly enjoyed his speculations on why it turned out the way it did.