Amazon.com Review
For pure political drama at the height of election season, there's nothing quite like a televised presidential debate. Though the candidates are stringently prepped before entering the event, surprises and raw candor often slip through as voters get their best opportunity to make direct comparisons. But according to author George Farah, Americans are not getting all the drama they're entitled to. Through the combined efforts of the Democratic and Republican establishments, legitimate third-party candidates are denied an arena to present their views, usually based on the notion that they are not viable contenders. This leads to a tautological situation: they can't debate because they aren't viable and they aren't viable because they're not allowed to debate. In
No Debate, Farah provides extensive background on how the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), dominated by Democratic and Republican party operatives, took over the debate process from more non-partisan groups and then entrenched their parties in power. Farah also provides illuminating insight on how, despite such collusion, the major parties continued to joust for power, telling of when the Clinton campaign feigned a desire to include Ross Perot the 1996 debates and agreed to drop the demand only when the hapless Dole camp caved in on all other issues. All of these backroom deals and shenanigans undermine democracy itself, according to Farah, as the electorate is denied access to ideas outside the self-perpetuating dominant parties and is thus disenfranchised from open democracy. To remedy the problem, Farah also proposes to return power of the debates to a non-partisan panel of citizen experts. The magnitude of the entrenchment problem Farah describes bodes ill for the implementation of his proposals, but
No Debate is sure to make one watch more skeptically the next time presidential hopefuls approach the podium.
--John Moe
From the Publisher
No Debate exposes just how far the Republicans and Democrats have sold out the American people in suppressing vital issues that need to be examined by the discerning voter. It is shocking, but maybe this book will shock citizens into action. PAUL M. WEYRICH, Heritage Foundation cofounder
George Farah argues persuasively that the presidential debates are organized almost entirely to serve the interests of the two major-party nominees and not the public interest. If you want a behind-the-scenes look at candidate negotiations, backstage maneuvering, and the machinations involved in dealing with major third-party candidates, No Debate is the book for you. NANCY M. NEUMAN, former president of the League of Women Voters
No Debate exposes how behind-the-scenes wheelin and dealin inside the Beltway wrecks our most valuable political forumsthe presidential debates turning them into cures for insomnia that prevent the American people from hearing about issues they want to hear about. JIM HIGHTOWER
At last, a full-scale, documented report on how the Commission on Presidential Debates rigs the process to prevent the public from hearing independent voices not connected with the Republican and Democratic parties. NAT HENTOFF
George Farah examines one of the biggest blasts of arrogance in the history of the United Statesthe collusion between the Republicans and Democrats to manipulate the public by manipulating the presidential debates. Every American citizen, regardless of party affiliation, should rise up against this un-American strategy. It's not just the White House thats at stake, but democracy itself. Read this book, get angry, and rise up. PHIL DONAHUE
Presidential debates are both a public function and an essential part of the electoral process. That process is now broken because of exclusionary rules dictated by private interests and narrow partisanship. George Farah has carefully researched and documented that charge. His prescription for reform would honor the principle of public interest and accountability by establishing a system which would provide fair and open debates. JOHN B. ANDERSON, former presidential candidate