I have been a "student" of photography for longer than I care to admit. The "rules" were drummed into my head mercilessly, ultimately becoming a major obstruction to creativity. How many moments were lost while my mind was running through f-stop-vs- DOF- vs Shutter speed-vs- motion blur considerations, instead of just firing the damn shutter! I think that this is also a microcosm of how we rule abiders experience our lives. somewhat recently I picked up a book "The Tao of Photography" which in a VERY oversimplified synopsis by me, parallels Chuang Tzu with "enlightened" photography. This is a philosophical approach to freeing ones mind from these restrictions (rules). I found this intriguing. I also tried so called "street" photography for the first time , using a cheap old Russian plastic camera with a rather good lens, and found it amazingly liberating. I then came across this book, bought it despite the poor review and found it to be a refreshing eyeopener! Nitsa advocates a lot of what the Taoistic one does but even more Taoistic,in as much as it comes from the heart, from the organic experience of living in the moment rather than from a calculated analysis of Taoist references and well known photographers statements. Mind you, The Tao of photography is very insightful and a fantastic companion to this book. It comes from the more intellectual perspective and is almost as much about living as it is about photography. Nitsa also alludes to the applicability of her philosophy to the art of living too. I have read her book at least 4-5 times and find myself getting a little bit closer to being free of the shackles, but it is still a struggle, just so hard to let go. I feel that my photography is after MANY years in it's infancy, but finally some growth seems possible! At last I can smell fresh air. I cannot compare to her seemingly boundless talent, and artistic energy, but could explain Modular Transfer Function charts in lens testing! How absurd! So ultimately it boils down to these questions... Can ART be taught? Can the art photography be learned by establishing mathematically based constrictions to the use of the machine to define its output? That's what the rules really are! Do you want to learn the Art of photography or obsess over the mechanical function of the apparatus. In my humble opinion, and frankly I'm nobody; there is nothing wrong in understanding the function of the mechanism of your camera, but that will likely seldom lead to creativity and art. The path that is clear is not the path. Perhaps the best way to pursue the vision is to free yourself from the highly technical and get something along the lines of a Holga, that is so simple that one immediately feels kind of liberated from robotic calculations, formulas etc. and learn to see what's around you. I think that I am finally beginning to see that there is profound beauty in the ordinary moments of our lives, the things and places we take for granted and often completely miss out on because we are too hurried or caught up in the need to control, or follow. This is where true art comes from and this is what I think Nitsa is writing about. I gave it only 4 stars because she repeats information, I think because it may need to be drummed into our heads to replace the existing dogmatic clutter, but honestly comes across a little bit like trying to fill more pages. Too bad, that the message is rather simple if difficult to accept. Too bad too, that a lot of pages are needed to feel that we get our money's worth. If you have the ears to hear what she is saying,then the value is absolutely there. If you cannot, then this is not the book for you, try a technical manual.