Most Helpful Customer Reviews
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Speed School, September 8, 2007
I found this book so fascinating I could barely put it down. It is very easy to read and basically tells you everything you could ever want to know about the history and use of meth. I give it four stars for two reasons. One, I found the outline of the book somewhat chaotic. The book is not laid out chronologically or otherwise but more like a series of individual stand alone essays. I had a feeling of a lack of continuity but it really doesn't take away from the book. I guess I would just be more comfortable with a standard chronological history. Two, there is an extensive bibliography but I would have preferred end notes or foot notes. I have no reason to doubt the quality of the author's research, but I do like to follow up on claims and statistics myself and it is a little more difficult when all the references are just listed in a bibliography. The book broke down many presumptions that I had about meth. I was utterly amazed at how old the drug is and that meth abuse is nothing new. The impact of politics and media I guess. Never did I feel the author glamorized the drug. This should be a must read before you make any intelligent comments regarding meth in conversation.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
13 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Glamorization, thinly veiled, October 31, 2009
This review is from: No Speed Limit: The Highs and Lows of Meth (Paperback)
Jesus Christ. Anyone who actually believes Owen's assertion that meth is "just another drug" has clearly not had much exposure to it, or is a current user himself (as Owen clearly is) and is in denial. A former meth (and heroin and cocaine, as well as alcohol, K, etc.) addict myself, I can tell you that meth is the ULTIMATE EVIL. Meth IS evil, and it literally brings out evil in every single person who uses it. The evil can be blatant (as it usually is), resulting in complete mental and physical destruction of the user and most everyone close to the user; or it can sometimes be more subtle, resulting in the publication of books like this. I can't tell you how many relatively normal children and adults I have seen transformed into, literally, the living dead. How does this differ from a drug like, oh, heroin? Christ, how does it NOT differ?? On heroin, you're sitting around, nodding out. Sure, you become emaciated and neglect everything else in your life. Sure, you lie, steal, and sell yourself to get the dope. Sure, you care about nothing else. But on meth, that's just the beginning. While heroin destroys you by DE-activating the good in you, meth destroys you (and those around you) by ACTIVATING the evil in you. Here's a fun fact, kids: More than half of the meth addicts I have known have either committed, or been an accessory in some way, to murder. Meth drives you insane. Meth addicts lose all contact with reality, and they don't just get useless, like on heroin, or stand behind their doors all paranoid that the DEA is coming (sure, they might very well be, but anyway-) as with crack. No, meth addicts get up, get out, and literally spread the virus of evil in as prolific a manner as Satan himself. So screw you, Frank Owen; in your quest for fame you are undoubtedly influencing (at least) hundreds of children who were on the borderline to start using meth- and they, in turn, will influence others. And thus, the evil is spread. Meth wins again... but hey; Frank Owen eeks out another marginal book, profiting from the misdeeds of others once again, and is now slightly better known! Way to go, Frank.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Downer For Those High On Hype, August 2, 2007
There never seems to be a shortage of books about drugs; and you could say that Frank Owen's, No Speed Limit, is merely one among the many. And, yes, this is true. It is one among many books written by authors who attempt to bring a rational voice to the oft irrational and unquestionably historic tendency of the media, politician's--and following suit--the public's susceptibility to react with panic concerning the issue of drug abuse (in this case, the latest drug crisis revolving around methamphetamine, or "meth") Do you remember the Crack epidemic? The Ecstasy epidemic? The Heroin epidemic? And, for all those old enough, the Alcohol crisis, which culminated in Prohibition? Owen's book is not only about the history of methamphetamine and the modern phenomenon of meth abuse in America, which is fascinating in and of itself, it's also about the nature of that ever-present hysterical phenomenon: the "drug epidemic," or what some sociologists have referred to as the "moral panic." This book has a fair mix of anecdotes, an interesting personal account of the drug's effects, statistics, and enough dispassionate reporting to please anyone interested in the topic at hand; in other words, it's wholly readable and reasonable. One of the principal strengths of the book is that Owen is not committing the same fallacies others have made and are still making concerning drug abuse; he is not giving into reasoning based on hyperbole, fear, and allegiance to an agenda at all costs. On the other hand, the author understands the fact of a kernel of truth inherent in every hype, but he makes a valiant effort to put it in its proper context. In fact, Owen himself has experienced firsthand just how bad methamphetamine can be and knows its potential for abuse and also understands the broader scope of problems that abuse of the drug can cause society. However, these points are tempered with the well-founded realization that not everyone who has used the drug is or will necessarily become a victim of it--there is too much proof otherwise. Drug abuse is a problem and the author is not denying it. That said, what Owen seems to be arguing, instead, is that since drug abuse is a problem, why make it worse with superfluous, fictional complexities. What is needed, he argues, is a levelheaded approach based on a broad understanding of the issue in its entirety, not one based on the end-of-civilization-as-we-know-it reaction we hear so often in the media (especially the media) and from our elected officials.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|