| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
37 of 42 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Full of innuendo and contempt,
By A Reviewer (Eugene, OR) - See all my reviews
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Nobody's Fool (Paperback)
This is a dreadful book by a journalist who ought to know better. He has his theories about Danny Kaye, and he fits the evidence (some of which is mighty thin) around them, unable to disguise how irritating and contemptible he finds his subject. His main theory is that Kaye wasn't "sexually available" and was "whipped by obedience" by his wife, and was therefore gay. The claim that he wasn't "sexually available" is repeated over and over, despite the fact that Kaye is shown having numbers of girlfriends in his early years and later affairs with Eve Arden, Princess Margaret, and others -- so it's a bit strange, not to say contrary, that Gottfriend insists his sexuality is hesitant or dubious. He throws out insinuations like "He certainly knew how to make love to [an audience]. The question was whether he could make love to a person." The whole book is full of snide remarks like that, dropped in without provocation. Even a photo of Kaye looking a healthy 60 (but without his age actually being identified) is captioned "Despite his interest in medicine and health, Kaye aged prematurely. His haggard appearance reflected an assortment of operations as well as, perhaps, a lifetime of internalized emotions." Gottfried labels Kaye "nasty," "icy," "juvenile," "childish," "passive," and, again and again, "sexually ambiguous." (Gottfried's ideas of what constitutes a real man seem to be straight out of the he-man '50s, and men who can sing, dance, and improvise comedy need not apply.) His antipathy for Kaye's wife, Sylvia Fine, is even stronger. Did he write this book on assignment? It seems odd that someone would dislike the subject of his book so strongly and feel so little sympathy for any aspect of him. What perhaps troubled me the most is the many statements made without citing evidence -- "the popularity of the double-talk was beginning to bother him," as well as all the innuendoes about sexual passivity -- so that in many instances we have no way of assessing how strong his evidence is. This is a pop biography, not a serious one, as if Danny Kaye doesn't deserve to have his work or life taken seriously. It's also as if the only interesting things about him might be contradictions to his public persona -- he wasn't gregarious! he was moody! he was unhappy! he was sexually ambiguous! -- as if in disappointment that no bigger scandals are forthcoming. Danny Kaye deserves better.
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
THE DANNY KAYE WE NEVER SAW,
This review is from: Nobody's Fool (Hardcover)
A twinkly-eyed jolly Hans Christian Andersen he was not, despite what the movies led us to believe. Instead, as the first full length biography of the master of the absurd, Danny Kaye, makes clear, he was bereft of humor off stage. What he had, according to this biographer, was a penchant for the small, the petty, the spiteful, and a great gift for scene stealing.However, none of that detracts from the actor's one-of-a-kind genius. While most of us probably missed the Broadway musical "Lady In The Dark" many treasure Kaye's televised delivery of that musical's show stopper - "Tchaikovsky," in which he recited the names of 49 Russian composers in 38 seconds. Such movies as "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" and "White Christmas" won him numerous fans; his television show (broadcast in the mid 60s) won him countless more. Pagliacci typifies the tearful clown in opera; perhaps Danny Kaye does the same in filmdom. Certainly the supposition that a comedic flair springs from pain is not new. Nobody's Fool brims with show business anecdotes, and refutes the oft heard rumors of a liaison between Kaye and Sir Laurence Olivier. The descriptions of Kaye's mean spiritedness are all the more puzzling when one remembers his tireless efforts for UNICEF. One indisputable fact is that he was an incredibly gifted entertainer, and he entertained us royally.
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
OK journalism where comedy becomes tragedy,
By Flynn Farralone (California) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Nobody's Fool (Paperback)
This is a rather comprehensive look at Kaye's life with credible, recognizable sources (such as Alan King and some of Kaye's co-stars/directors/producers), although this book screams for input from the biggies in Kaye's life such as his daughter (apparently prohibited from speaking about her parents in their will) and some of his high-profile friends (most of whom were dead by the time this book was published). Gottfried airs out Kaye's dirty laundry pretty much, which is why we all read biographies anyways, and even if half of what he claims is true (no reason to believe it isn't as Gottfried is a respected journalist and the book has credible sources), then it is a fact that the Danny Kaye that generations laughed at for years and years was not really a reflection of who Kaye really was, and that Kaye predictably had a very dark side to him like most "zany" comedians -- Jerry Lewis, Robin Williams, Steve Martin and of course Jim Carrey come to mind.
Kaye could have been worse -- no claims of drug/alcohol abuse, not physically abusive, etc. -- but he appears to have been a totally self-absorbed manic-depressive and possibly (POSSIBLY) a closeted homosexual. The revelations made me sad not so much because he wasn't what he portrayed on-screen, but that he appears to have not enjoyed such a rich life and did not appreciate what he did for people (and did not appreciate the people who supported him and loved him so much). I never imagined Kaye to be a zany, delightful elf in his off-hours, but I always imagined him to be a gentle, perhaps retiring, sweet man, and according to Gottfried, he was not. I think the person I felt the worst for after reading this book was his wife, Sylvia Fine, who has a notorious reputation in Hollywood lore as an enormously unpleasant woman. Was she this way because she was really that unkind and controlling? Gottfried presents a slightly different perspective, portraying her as a very shy, somewhat homely, but enormously intelligent woman who lacked social confidence, especially when contrasted to her incredibly extroverted and charming husband. The Fine we come to know is a woman who fell madly in love with Kaye at the age of 14 and kept on worshipping and holding on to him through infidelities, isolation, abandonment and humiliation up until his deathbed. All-in-all, the book left me feeling that Kaye and Fine's life was triumphant in many outward ways but tragic on the personal side. But Kaye was a one-of-a-kind genius and it appears that people with his level of talent always pay for it in tears. But we must also remember that Kaye was a hard-working perfectionist who gave more of himself to the world than most, and that also takes a toll. His audience who "took" so much from him -- from moviegoers, to music-hall attendees to yes, even UNICEF -- was also instrumental in making Kaye the man who he was.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|