54 of 58 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Non-locality is implicate at all scales, July 7, 2000
This review is from: The Non-Local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind (Hardcover)
Non-locality and quantum entanglement are neither delicate nor rare events. Quantum non-locality is not rare and does not disappear. The Universe operates according to the principles of complementarity at all scales - Kafatos and Nadeau established the particulars of this verity with extraordinary adroitness in their watershed book "The Conscious Universe." The concept of non-locality as an implicate attribute of the material world is borne out by three pieces of impeccably documented science which are only now becoming generally known. Nicolas Gisin and his colleagues at CERN proved that Bell's predictions regarding non-locality were precisely correct. The positron-electron pairs they separated with a Potassium Niobate crystal and shunted through 15 kilometers of fiber optic cable, automatically re-oriented spin and polarity instantaneously to maintain net-spin values of zero when one of the particle-pair was accelerated through an electromagnetic field, to seven decimal points, in repeated trials. The effective rate at which the information transfer occurred between the particles is calculated to be at least 10 to the nine times faster than the speed of light. Second, Vladimir Poponin has demonstrated in his work with the DNA Phantom Effect that every molecule of DNA exerts a non-local field effect on the material locale surrounding it, which persists for up to 30 days after the DNA molecule source has been removed. The importance of Poponin's work is that it proves unequivocally that among living organisms, non-locality operates simultaneously with chemo-synaptic neuronal processes at all scales and in all living things. Finally, Donald Eigler's work at IBM's Almaden Lab's proves that non-local holographic field effects operate in all things as an intrinsic attribute of matter at atomic and sub-atomic scales, regardless of whether the materials are organic or not. In "The Non-Local Universe," Kafatos has simply opened the lid to this Pandora's box by providing an epistemological model which is carefully thought out, clearly articulated and reasonably constructed. His model is absolutely right on the mark and deserves to be read by anyone who is willing to look at this aggregation of unimpeachable evidence with clear scientific detachment.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
24 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The Non-Local Universe: Beyond Postmodernism, November 28, 2000
This review is from: The Non-Local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind (Hardcover)
Even though I found Nadeau and Kafatos' The Non-Local Universe" a challenge to absorb, I couldn't put it down. In this book, the authors do much more than just rehash some much pondered over points about the implications of the Gisin and Aspect experiments that verified Bell's Theorem. For those of you who haven't checked out what's happening in modern physics in the last 50 years or so, "The mathematical statement derived by Bell in his theorem is known as Bell's inequality, and it is predicated on two major assumptions in local realistic theories-locality and realism." (p. 69) Aspect and then Gisin figured out a way to measure paired subatomic particles which refuted the locality assumption. Although Nadeau and Kafatos never make this exact point, one way to understand the refutation of localism is that in their wave structure, subatomic particles are extended infinitely throughout space and time (highly improbable, but nevertheless finitely probable). Hence in this sense, every particle/wave overlaps every other particle/wave and therefore, "We are all connected."
Nadeau and Kafatos are at great (sometimes, too great) pains to show how slowly and laboriously many physicists have given up the assumption that mathematical models of external reality can have a one-to-one correspondence with that reality. They even imagine Einstein still living and contemplating the Aspect experiments, agreeing that he was wrong and Bohr was right. They spend a comparable amount of effort in painting a non-picture of our non-local universe, as their book title might imply. The reason I say "non-picture" is the fact that a central point of theirs is that we can not adequately visualize a more than three-dimensional universe. While the "non-picture" that they paint is at times fuzzy and not well worked out, a mere blueprint for further investigations, they propose that it is free of metaphysical assumptions (including the one-to-one correspondence theory).
In other chapters in their expansive book of modest size (240 pp.), they trace literature that rejects the narrow Darwinian interpretation of evolution and replaces it with an ecological view of the earth's biota as a self-regulating organinism (Ch. 6), trace the evolution of humans as symbol-using creatures and the emergence of self-consciousness, not as isolated in a separate mental realm, but rather as "[deriving] its existence from embedded relations to [the larger whole of biological life]. (Ch. 7,.p. 144) and offer a critique of classical economic theories, showing how building an economic theory using the emerging ecological paradigm can account for and ameliorate overproduction based on a solely competitive model. (Ch. 10)
One of the threads of insight woven through each of these chapters is what Nadeau and Kafatos call the "logic of complementarity." They are building on Bohr's conception of the complementarity of wave and particle. One of the implications of Quantum Theory is that a complete view of subatomic structure must rely on its being viewed as both wave-like and particle-like. When subatomic structure is not being observed it is wave-like, when it is being observed, it is particle-like. We also see in Einstein's general theory of relativity the complementary nature of time and space. They suggest "that the logic of complementarity could be the logic of nature and that the use of this logic as a heuristic could serve to better explain the character of other profound oppositions in the natural process." (p. 103)
In various places in their book, they also trace the history of Western philosophical and scientific thought leading up to, through, and beyond Bohr's Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory, and they trace the development of the Postmodernist movement as a reaction to the Classical Realist metaphysics implicit in much of earlier math and physics. In doing so, they are really trying to solve a communication problem for academics in C. P. Snow's two camps: "Another of our large ambitions here is to demonstrate that our new understanding of the relationship between parts and wholes in physical reality can serve as the basis for a renewed dialog between the two cultures of humanist-social scientists and scientists-engineers." (p. 13)
In tracing the Postmodernist literature from roots in Nietsche and Husserl to more contemporary writers like Lacan and Foucault, they identify three major assumptions of Postmodernist metatheory and assert that "the resulting view of human consciousness is an extension of Cartesian dualism and not in accord with our current scientific world view." (p. 165) Nadeau and Kafatos in no way intend to denigrate the work of the postmodernists, which they say "has, in general, made us a more humane society and served as a source of liberation for large numbers of individuals." (p. 164) Their point is rather that "since the postmodern view of the relationship between mind and world is one of the primary sources of our contemporary dispair and angst, the prospect that it could be displaced by an alternate and much more positive view is certainly worth considering."
Toward the end of the book, they sketch Capra's "ecological world view," which is distinguishable in terms of five related shifts of emphasis, and "which is entirely consistent with the understanding of physical reality revealed in modern physics." (p. 213) Here is a sketch of the core of this idea: 1) properties of parts must be understood as dynamics of the whole, 2) every structure manifests a fundamentally dynamic web of relationships, 3) human observers and their processes of knowledge must be embedded in knowledge descriptions, 4) phenomena exist as mutually consistent relationships; knowledge is an interconnected network of relationships founded on self-consistency and agreement with fact, and 5) the whole constituting webs of relationships cannot be represented by our necessarily approximate descriptions.
I can tell you this much about "The Non-Local Universe." Even though I had a passing acquaintance with the writings of visionary physicists, before I read this book, I felt like a body trapped in a time sequence. Now I have a different view of myself, connected to other beings and to the Universe, past, present and future....
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Nonlocality-- A fact of nature, September 21, 2000
This review is from: The Non-Local Universe: The New Physics and Matters of the Mind (Hardcover)
If Albert Einstein had lived long enough to witness the results of experiments carried out in the decades of the 80's and 90's he would have to concede that quantum theory is a self-consistent theory, and physical reality is nonlocal. These experiments validated John Stewart Bell's nonlocality theorem, which confirmed that the physical universe is holistic, and Indeterminate: a fact that many physicist call the most profound discovery of science. This is the premise of a thoroughly enlightening book by Nadeau and Kafatos, who by virtue of concise and clear writing entice anyone willing to take the time and effort on a journey into the new world of nonlocality. Einstein himself, a contributor to quantum theory was not willing to give up on the idea of deterministic principles, and in his most famous thought experiment called EPR (devised with the help of two colleagues) he made his most brilliant attempt to save classical causal reality. Bell's theorem, however, put an end to a deterministic universe by demonstrating that realism--a reality existing independent of observation--could not exist at the deepest levels of reality. Cartesian dualism fails as a scientific paradigm in a nonlocal universe for the following reasons. First, physical laws and theories have no independent existence and are subjective human constructs. Second, an objective reality, by defintion, suggests a consciousness separate and distinct from the rest of reality. This is invalid in a holistic universe. And, finally, science can claim knowledge of physical reality only when the predictions of a physcial theory are validated by experiment. In a nonlocal universe the indivisible whole cannot be measured or observed--they are complimentary. Complimentarity demonstrates that the whole is not equal to the sum of its parts. This is evident in physical reality as well as in biology. Attempts to understand life as a whole can never be completely realized using the reductionist approach. The relationshiip between part and whole in biology mirrors nonlocality in physics. The authors make the philosophical argument that sicne consiousness is an emergent process of the brain, and the brain it turn, is an emergent procss of the undivided whole, it is not unreasonable to believe that the universe is conscious.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
