Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more



or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering
Sell Us Your Item
For a $2.52 Gift Card
Trade in
More Buying Choices
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Start reading Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk [Paperback]

Massimo Pigliucci
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (35 customer reviews)

List Price: $20.00
Price: $13.54 & FREE Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $6.46 (32%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.
Want it Tuesday, May 28? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition $5.13  
Hardcover $70.53  
Paperback $13.54  
Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged $21.95 or Free with Audible 30-day free trial
Rent Your Textbooks
Save up to 70% when you rent your textbooks on Amazon. Keep your textbook rentals for a semester and rental return shipping is free.

Book Description

May 15, 2010 0226667863 978-0226667867

Recent polls suggest that fewer than 40 percent of Americans believe in Darwin’s theory of evolution, despite it being one of science’s best-established findings. More and more parents are refusing to vaccinate their children for fear it causes autism, though this link can been consistently disproved. And about 40 percent of Americans believe that the threat of global warming is exaggerated, despite near consensus in the scientific community that manmade climate change is real.

Why do people believe bunk? And what causes them to embrace such pseudoscientific beliefs and practices? Noted skeptic Massimo Pigliucci sets out to separate the fact from the fantasy in this entertaining exploration of the nature of science, the borderlands of fringe science, and—borrowing a famous phrase from philosopher Jeremy Bentham—the nonsense on stilts. Presenting case studies on a number of controversial topics, Pigliucci cuts through the ambiguity surrounding science to look more closely at how science is conducted, how it is disseminated, how it is interpreted, and what it means to our society. The result is in many ways a “taxonomy of bunk” that explores the intersection of science and culture at large.

No one—not the public intellectuals in the culture wars between defenders and detractors of science nor the believers of pseudoscience themselves—is spared Pigliucci’s incisive analysis. In the end, Nonsense on Stilts is a timely reminder of the need to maintain a line between expertise and assumption. Broad in scope and implication, it is also ultimately a captivating guide for the intelligent citizen who wishes to make up her own mind while navigating the perilous debates that will affect the future of our planet.


Frequently Bought Together

Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk + The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Price for both: $26.54

Buy the selected items together


Editorial Reviews

Review

"A refreshingly original excursion over the unmarked territory separating science from pseudoscience and nonscience, Nonsense on Stilts is a thoughtful examination of the tumultuous terrain between the two and a primer on how one tells the difference." - Kendrick Frazier, editor of Skeptical Inquirer.

About the Author

Massimo Pigliucci is professor of philosophy at the City University of New York. He has written many books, including, most recently, Making Sense of Evolution, with Jonathan Kaplan, also published by the University of Chicago Press.


Product Details

  • Paperback: 336 pages
  • Publisher: University Of Chicago Press (May 15, 2010)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0226667863
  • ISBN-13: 978-0226667867
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (35 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #171,934 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Massimo Pigliucci is a Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York. His research is concerned with philosophy of science, the relationship between science and philosophy, and the nature of pseudoscience.

He received a Doctorate in Genetics from the University of Ferrara in Italy, a PhD in Botany from the University of Connecticut, and a PhD in Philosophy from the University of Tennessee. He has published over a hundred technical papers and several books. Prof. Pigliucci has been awarded the prestigious Dobzhansky Prize from the Society for the Study of Evolution. He has been elected fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science "for fundamental studies of genotype by environmental interactions and for public defense of evolutionary biology from pseudoscientific attack."

In the areas of outreach and critical thinking, Prof. Pigliucci has published in national magazines such as Skeptic, Skeptical Inquirer, Philosophy Now, and The Philosopher's Magazine, among others. He has also been elected as a Consultant for the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Pigliucci pens the "Rationally Speaking" blog (rationallyspeaking.org), and co-hosts the Rationally Speaking podcast.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews
65 of 69 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
In spite of the title and cover of this book which give the impression of a popular look at the issue of science and society, this book actually takes a fairly scientific (and philosophical) approach to the topic. Concern about the public's take on scientific issues has recently fueled the output of many books on this topic, but while a lot of them are either popular views of the issue written by journalists, focusing on many anecdotes and news items or more narrow takes based on one particular scientific topic, this one attempts to be a more systematic look at the issue of science itself from the viewpoint of a scientist and philosopher.

The book is divided into a number of different sections starting with the whole issue of how to decide what is science, soft science and pseudoscience moving through a number of case studies and finally ending up with both a coverage of the history of thought on what constitutes science (and scientific methodology) and what constitutes scientific expertise. A number of famous and influential thinkers are quoted and considered from Plato on up to Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn.

While some casual readers might find the book to be a bit dense and difficult to follow in some sections, anyone who is genuinely interested in some of the hot-button scientific issues of the day such as evolution, global warming or even unified field theories, will find this book thought provoking at the very least. The most salient point about the book for me is that in the end, the author concludes that while some things are definitely science and others are definitely pseudoscience, there is no black and white border between the two, no absolute certainty in the realm of science and no perfect criteria for determining expertise or who is right. In the end, he encourages his readers to be discerning and to be able to apply a number of different outlooks and strategies in order to arrive at a reasonable perspective on the validity of scientific claims and claims of expertise while always maintaining a healthy and rational sense of skepticism.

Finally, there seems to be a warning running through the book not to allow what the author calls postmodern or relativist outlooks erode the barrier between good science and pseudoscience. In a nutshell, this means that the idea that all science is tied to the cultural, social and personal heritage of the scientist in question should not lead us to put pseudoscience on the same level as science.

I don't think the author of this book intended this to be a comprehensive textbook on the history of the status of science in human societies but rather a good overall introduction for popular audiences based on some sketches from the history of thought on the topic as well as current issues that arise.
Was this review helpful to you?
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Wonderful topics, mediocre organization June 23, 2010
By Terry
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
Organization: The chapters did not flow in any reasonable sense as it pertained to the topic of the book. There were sections in the center where he attacks Bjorn Lambourg, the Postmodernists, as well as includes a history of scientific thinking. While these were enjoyable, all except the attacks on the postmodernists didn't exactly fit the progression that the author was making. The last two chapters should have been pushed up considerably as the expert problem and checklist of what makes a science should have come shortly after the introduction.

Writing: Massimo is a master of concise prose and uses analogies that advance the point at hand. His mastery of what others have said gives him access to wonderful ways to summarize ideas and distill important points quickly; other authors could wind up using twice as many words to say the same thing without adding anything.

Notes: Some of the footnotes were both funny and illuminating. I very much wish they'd been the bottom-of-the-page kind rather than the all-lumped-at-the-end kind.

Topics: The selection of targets was well done and got at issues that other books seemed to skip like how to gauge expertise and how Bayesianism and Prospectivism can be used to both support the efficacy of science and recognize the problem of qualia.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
31 of 38 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The Demarcation Problem June 5, 2010
Format:Paperback
This is an excellent book for anyone interested in the philosophy of science. It discusses, not just how to distinguish science from pseudoscience, but points out just how difficult it is to say exactly what IS science. Veterans of the skeptics movement will be well familiar with most of this material, but it's an entertaining and informative book nonetheless.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars We need more ammunition like this to help in the fight against the...
A major political party in America has been taken over by the forces of darkness. Purveyors of scientific illiteracy continue to bombard American citizens with their claims about... Read more
Published 2 months ago by Paul Burnett
5.0 out of 5 stars Great Book
I found this book to be easy to read and understand. I feel I have a much better understanding for telling the difference between non-sense and real science now.
Published 2 months ago by F. Spohr
3.0 out of 5 stars Essays on the nature of science. Could be written better.
Massimo Pugliucci's work explores the demarcation problem of science. The 12 chapters in the book are written like essays which require a thorough reading, not once... Read more
Published 7 months ago by Ronald George
3.0 out of 5 stars "Nonsense on Stilts" by Massimo Pigliucci
A philosophy of science type book about the difference between science, pseudo-science and pure bunk, which is an important subject given the amount of the latter two that are in... Read more
Published 9 months ago by weston
2.0 out of 5 stars Fails to achieve coherence
Although the author's goal is admirable the book fails to meet a basic target market for his ideas. Although a simplification to be sure, the majority of readers can likely be... Read more
Published 9 months ago by Chad
4.0 out of 5 stars More of a case study than a guide
This book promises to tell you 'How to Tell Science From Bunk'. Of course, had Pigliucci really delivered, he'd go down in history as one of the greatest philosophers of science. Read more
Published 13 months ago by Copyzombie
5.0 out of 5 stars Ignore the 1 stars, as they show ignorance
There is only one reason, and one reason alone why someone would give this book less than at least 3 or 4 stars. Read more
Published 14 months ago by E. Fields
5.0 out of 5 stars Great!
I love this book. It is very well written, and I love the fact that everything is very well defined, as far as one can define science and pseudoscience. Read more
Published 19 months ago by daviddinozzo
5.0 out of 5 stars A good dose of skeptical food for thought
Reviews of this book, while generally positive, rank this book varyingly. More than a few reviewers complain what amounts to it's disheveled structure and too casual writing... Read more
Published 22 months ago by jtk
3.0 out of 5 stars Misreading Gould
The book provides an interesting, if not particularly well organized, romp through good and bad science practices and attempts (a bit awkwardly) to distinguish between... Read more
Published 23 months ago by Michael S. Berry
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews


Forums

There are no discussions about this product yet.
Be the first to discuss this product with the community.
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 





Look for Similar Items by Category