Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Norton A259 3X Ergonomic Hand Sander, 7" Length x 3-2/3" Width (Pack of 1)

5 out of 5 stars 1 customer review

Price: $15.95 ($15.95 / Packs) & FREE Shipping on orders over $35. Details
Only 16 left in stock.
Sold by LKLLC and Fulfilled by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Specifications for this item
Brand Name Norton Abrasives - St. Gobain
Part Number 07660705237
Color Black
UPC 076607052377
Construction Type Coated
EAN 0076607052377
Number of Items 1
Overall Length 7  inches
Overall Width 3-2/3  inches
UNSPSC Code 31191500

The Norton A259 3X ergonomic hand sander is designed for use ... See more product details

Gear Up for 2016

Product Features

  • Ergonomic hand sander designed for use with Norton 3X High-Performance pre-cut 3-2/3 W x 9" L sanding sheets
  • Holding clips provide a secure clamp and fit
  • Handle provides a secure grip and keeps hands clear of the workpiece

Product Details

  • Shipping Weight: 4.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Domestic Shipping: Item can be shipped within U.S.
  • International Shipping: This item is not eligible for international shipping. Learn More
  • ASIN: B003O5TDMO
  • Item model number: 05237
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #56,334 in Industrial & Scientific (See Top 100 in Industrial & Scientific)
  • Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here

Product Description

The Norton A259 3X ergonomic hand sander is designed for use with Norton 3X (A259) pre-cut 3-2/3 x 9" sanding sheets, which provide premium finishes on most surfaces. The holding clips securely clamp and fit the sanding sheets to the handle. The handle provides a secure grip and keeps hands clear of the workpiece.

Coated abrasives have individual abrasive grains spaced at a predetermined distance from one another. They are used for a variety of applications — from shaping a part to fine finishing, depending on grit size. Low grit numbers such as 40 are coarse and are used for removing excess material and shaping a part. High grit numbers such as 400 are rated as fine and help create a smooth surface finish. Closed coat abrasives are 100 percent covered with abrasive grains, which extends the abrasive's life, maximizes material removal, and achieves finer finishes on metals and hard materials than an open coat. Closed coats are only recommended for use with non-clogging materials. For open coat abrasives, 50 to 75 percent of the surface is evenly covered, which provides a rougher finish because the abrasive grains are spaced farther apart than on a fully coated product. The gritless spaces promote flexibility and resist clogging when abrading difficult-to-sand materials. The flexibility or rigidity of the abrasive product is also affected by the choice of backing material (either paper, cloth, or fiber). Paper backing, the most flexible backing option, contours to the workpiece and delivers a more consistent finish than fiber or cloth backings. Paper backings are categorized by weight from lightest to heaviest (A- to F-weight respectively). Cloth backings are slightly more rigid, durable, and tear resistant than paper backing, but can still withstand repeated flexing. Cloth backing is categorized by weight from lightest to heaviest (J-, X-, Y-, and H-weight respectively). Fiber backing is the strongest and most rigid backing option, and is recommended for aggressive material removal.

Norton Abrasives manufactures sanding, grinding, and polishing abrasives. The company, founded in 1885, meets International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards 9000 and 14001 for quality and environmental management.

Customer Reviews

5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
This is a great paper holder, it is the smaller size one, just be aware of that when you order em.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse