Most Helpful Customer Reviews
78 of 86 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Not a believer... but this book's good., July 1, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: Nostradamus: The Complete Prophecies (Hardcover)
Of all the books written about Nostradamus' prophecies, this one is one of the few that tries to be objective and doesn't present silly and ridiculous arguments and interpretations. Hogue actually recognises the fact that many of the seer's quatrains are so extremely vague that they allow themselves to dozens of different interpretations. Or.. could Nostradamus have been so amazing as to write one quatrain that predicts different events? I don't know, but I'm sure some like to think so.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Hogue Presents Open-Minded View, September 17, 2001
This review is from: Nostradamus: The Complete Prophecies (Hardcover)
Hogue has obviously spent a lot of time and effort in research both into Nostrodamus's life (which is very important when understanding what ANY author is writing) and into the translations and interpretations of the quatrains. He gives the reader the purpose behind the predictions, an in-depth rationale as to the reason it is so difficult to translate, admits his own short-comings, and then attempts to translate them to English, but always gives alternate meanings if they are too unclear to interpret in just one way. He interprets each quatrain in the way he believes it to be interpreted, incorporates other authors' interpretations, and encourages the reader to make his/her own interpretation. This prophecies, in their original form, are very, very difficult to understand, and Hogue gives and open-minded view to the interpretations and never says that he is absolutely right. I admire anyone who admits they don't have all of the answers and appreciated being educated enough in reading his book to be able to make my own interpretations.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
What a waste of time (26 years!), March 21, 2002
Although not a waste of money! This book (the comments) was written by a non-scholar, in a pseudo-scholarly way. His translation is questionable (to say the least), the historical inaccuracy shows that he is not interested in history, nor were the geographic annotations checked on a map. IT IS however a compendium of what most people (English or Americans, or Anglo-philes) who are into new age believe to be a good interpretation of Nostradamus' work. So it's quite amusing. But remember: Nostradamus was French, not American (only quite recently discovered) or English! It does contain a good transcript of the original texts, which is a plus for people who know French. What's really disturbing about it is the bias the writer overtly displays towards certain 'political' interpretations (the bush administration will be regarded as one of the most beneficial influences on mankind for centuries to come, apparently) which I find slightly exaggerated. In short: the author's comments are not the result of years of research but the result of years of self-indulging, non-critical, self-opinionating thought. A shame, all that wasted time. BUT I 'm having a good time laughing, waiting for an objective book about Nostradamus to come out.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|