From Library Journal
Former U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitchell discusses the major political ideologies that have shaped the world from the late 19th century to the present: capitalism and communism. Mitchell reveals how Lenin transformed Marx's ideas in the creation of the Soviet Union, how Stalin corrupted these ideologies even further, and how Gorbachev and Yeltsin dismantled the result. In the West, the Great Depression gave Hitler the opportunity to create a fascist government, while Roosevelt modified U.S. capitalism to accommodate government intervention in economic affairs. Mitchell argues that it was Roosevelt's ability to get the New Deal programs approved that saved capitalism from falling to dictatorship and oppression. His analysis, while painting a straightforward portrait of capitalism's triumph over communism, does not spark anything new. What is particularly disappointing is his failure to discuss Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs, which further modified the American capitalist experiment. Still, this book is very easy to read and is recommended for political science collections in college libraries.?Patricia Hatch, Insurance Inst. for Property Loss Reduction, Boston
Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Kirkus Reviews
It's not clear whom the triumph of democracy was for if not America, but the question of whom this book is for is even more puzzling. Mitchell, the former Senate majority leader (D-Maine), weaves his family history and personal observations into a sweeping survey of the major domestic and international political events of the 20th century. The Cold War, culminating with the demise of Communism and the breakup of the Soviet Union, receives special attention along with the world wars and the Depression. Against this background Mitchell considers the origins of Marxist ideology and the development of Communism in the Soviet Union from Lenin to Stalin to Gorbachev, and the development of American political ideology from Wilson to Franklin Roosevelt to Clinton. Although he writes in the first person, Mitchell limits his personal anecdotes to interactions with Mikhail Gorbachev at the time of perestroika; personal judgments, which are only mildly partisan by contemporary standards, are a minor element of the book. In the final two chapters, history gives way to current events in a general survey of pressing contemporary domestic and international issues. Throughout the effort is thoughtful, balanced, and basically superficial. One question, then, is why anyone would bother to read it. Without extensive accounts of first-hand experience or novel and controversial interpretations of events, this is little more than an intelligent gloss over familiar ground. The more intriguing question is why this sensible and sensitive individual spent his time writing this odd mix of popular history, personal presentation, and scholarly reserve. The American public would be better served by having Mitchell back in the Senate or some other high office than writing books like this one. --
Copyright ©1997, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.