Brings together the philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre and Zen Buddhism.
| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Contrary to the Prior Review. . .,
By
This review is from: Nothingness and Emptiness: A Buddhist Engagement With the Ontology of Jean-Paul Sartre (Paperback)
I actually quite enjoyed this. No, it's certainly not for someone with a passing interest in Philosophy; likewise for someone with a minor vocabulary. It is, absolutely, a difficult work. But Laycock seems interested in preserving his ideas in the honeycombed Literary modes of Phenomenology, Existentialism and (a relatively esoteric form of) Buddhism, and succeeds by acheiving a work as complex as it is. This defines the barrier for the average reader though, regardless of how versed they are in "jargon." Laycock is painstaking in his analysis, both in its poesis and its content, and the book is certainly worth the time if you are deeply interested in any of the aforementioned doctrines. However, as the other reviewer exemplifies, if you're not able to really dig in and spend a few minutes with each page (literally so, it's a SLOW read), you may as well use it as a fan instead. Overall, though, _Nothingness and Emptiness_ turns out to be a wonderful experience of rich, meditative philosophy, challenging and rewarding in its complexity and linguistic depth. Laycock's assertions and conclusions (especially those involving Nagarjuna and Madhyamaka Buddhism) are absolutely fascinating even if one is compelled to disagree at times. But the end result is an expanded and appreciative view of Mahayana Buddhism, and an absolutely exploded take on Sartrean Existentialism/Phenomenology. I feel the book is deserving of far better than one solitary, short-sighted bash--give it a try. If you've any interest in either half of Laycock's equation (i.e.- Buddhism OR Sartre) you'll be surprisingly welcomed if you attempt it with patience and an empty mind.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Read and re-read,
By
This review is from: Nothingness and Emptiness: A Buddhist Engagement With the Ontology of Jean-Paul Sartre (Paperback)
This book is rich in insight and throughness. Yes, you need time to read it, but Laycock has taken an idea that I've thrown around in my own mind for some time and expanded on it with a philospher's throughness.
I am aware that similar arguments are available in Asian texts, but with a Westerner's skepticism, I needed a good Western argument to convince me!
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Awe-inspiring!,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Nothingness and Emptiness: A Buddhist Engagement With the Ontology of Jean-Paul Sartre (Hardcover)
It amazes me what some regard as "boring". But I will warn you, if you find
Derrida, Heidegger, Levinas and Sartre boring, then avoid this book. However, if these authors fascinate you -Read this book! Then, read it again. I would pay ten times what I did for this cerebral adventure!
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|