| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
65 of 69 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pretty Darn Accurate,
By
This review is from: The Novel 100: A Ranking of the Greatest Novels of All Time (Paperback)
Mr. Burt has taken a stab at the thankless, controversial, and questionable task of ranking the world's greatest 100 novels in numerical sequence, and justifying his decisions in about five pages per novel. (There is also a second, unelaborated list of 100 "honorable mention" novels.) I would say that, all things considered, he has done quite well. He is strongest on summarizing the novels in such a way that we are eager to read (or reread) them, and in placing them in their historical and literary-historical context. He doesn't do quite so much with style. This is perhaps understandable, given not only his space limitations, but also the fact that many of the works were not written in English. He seems especially on target in choosing and ranking the works of Dostoyevsky, Faulkner, James, and Bellow. However, there are several works which I feel should have been in the "Top 100" rather than "Honorable mention:" Nabokov's Pale Fire, Lawrence's Sons and Lovers, Rushdie's Midnight's Children, Mann's Doctor Faustus, Calvino's Invisible Cities, and Dickens's David Copperfield. And the following should have at least been mentioned: Alexander Theroux's Darconville's Cat, David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest, John Crowley's Little, Big, and Georges Perec's Life: a User's Manual. This is not to suggest that Burt shies away from difficulty in making his recommendations: Finnegans Wake is rated in the top 50! One quibble: it is stated on the book jacket that the author arrived at his decisions with the aid of other scholars. Those scholars, and the type of aid, should be specified. Or does this consist of the quotations with which he heads each of his summaries? Recommended for neophyte and veteran novelophiles.
47 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Informative and engaging,
By A Customer
This review is from: The Novel 100: A Ranking of the Greatest Novels of All Time (Paperback)
This is a daunting, not to say impossible, task: ranking the greatest novels of all time, but Burt has accounted himself well with his selections. Sure, there are favorites missing and novels that anyone might rank higher or lower, but in general it's hard to fault his choices. Each novel is covered succinctly, and Burt manages an enthusiasm for his subject that is contageous.It's easy to quibble with the ranking aspect of the book, but readers will learn an enormous amount from Burt's efforts here.
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A necessary evil,
By GJC (World) - See all my reviews
This review is from: The Novel 100: A Ranking of the Greatest Novels of All Time (Paperback)
Sure this list is a bit questionable. And sure there will always be personal favorites missing. Burt, himself, can't seem to resist the urge to include an alternate list of 100 more titles. But Burt has created at least a starting point for those who want to read important novels. Too many best of novels lists are confined to the 20th century, and English language books. Also the ones that let popular tastes in (come on how much L.Ron Hubbard or Ayn Rand is really that good--check out the alternate list to the Modern Library's top 100 to see the poor choices people make), seem to ignore literary history. His summaries of each book are concise and accurate without being overly academic. Also some of decisions for the inclusion on the list seem to stem from historical significance (e.g. Gone with the Wind, Dracula, the Hound of the Baskervilles), as opposed to literary merit. This is a necessary reference book for any lover of good literature. Buy it, and use it to help guide you through some of the books on the list. And remember that if you don't understand why a book is on the list, the flaw might be with your understanding of it, not the inclusion on the list (it took me three times to see why _Beloved_ is such a good book--the first time I read it I hated it).
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
