Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
$4.00
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Very Good | Details
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: While this book has been loved by someone else, they left it in great condition. Hurry and buy it before someone else does and take advantage of our FREE Super Saver Shipping!!!
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly Hardcover – April 14, 2011


See all 10 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$1.33 $0.01

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 240 pages
  • Publisher: Penguin Press HC, The; First Edition edition (April 14, 2011)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 1594202788
  • ISBN-13: 978-1594202780
  • Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 5.6 x 0.9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 3.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (28 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #501,282 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

'A characteristic John Kay production. It is a pleasure to read...with wit and humour, too. He integrates economics and philosophy, operations research and sociology, political science and psychology. It is a useful corrective to the patent remedies of those snake-oil salesmen who display their wares at airport bookshops...a thought-provoking, and even useful read.' Howard Davies, Financial Times --This text refers to an alternate Hardcover edition.

About the Author

John Kay is a visiting professor at the London School of Economics and a fellow of St John's College, Oxford. As research director and director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies he established it as one of Britain's most respected think tanks. Since then he has been a professor at the London Business School and the University of Oxford, where he was the first director of the Said Business School. He is a regular columnist for the Financial Times and the author of numerous books, including The Truth About Markets and The Long and the Short of It. --This text refers to an alternate Hardcover edition.

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

This is an interesting observation but how useful is it?
Richie
People--including, but not limited to business people--should remain flexible and open to new ideas, technologies, markets and other things that impact what we do.
D. Saverino
As I read the book, I thought that there was just not enough material to fill a book and that the concepts could be presented better in an article.
Houman Tamaddon

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Hardcover Verified Purchase
Obliquity refutes the idea that complex systems can be understood in enough detail to be actively managed no matter what the experts say. John Kay's point concentrates on the folly of control and the hubris of those who believe that they can directly architect, direct and dictate changes to achieve their goals.

Obliquity rests on the argument that the world is too complex, dynamic and ever changing to control in the way that most business leaders think. Leaders want direct action - raise profits, or enter new markets - that are often lead to failure for the simple reason that they are too direct. In place of directly pursuing goals, Kay recommends leaders choose to obliquity.

Obliquity describes the process of achieving complex objectives indirectly. Things cannot be understood well enough or remain stable long enough for a direct plan to work. The central idea of the book can be summed up

"If you are clear about your high-level goals and knowledgeable enough about the systems their achievement depends on, then you can solve problems in a direct way. But goals are often vague, interactions unpredictable, complex extensive, problem descriptions incomplete, the environment uncertain. That is where obliquity comes into play."

Kay's book concentrates on discussing the different aspects of an indirect approach and the relative inability of pre-planned and controlled solutions to lead to results. Kay covers different aspects of this issue through a series of focused chapters. The discussion tends toward an academic view. Because of this, I would recommend reading the book a particular way:

Chapter 1 -- Obliquity - why are objectives are often best pursued directly.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Hardcover
I want to take a very direct approach to reviewing this book. This is because writing a book review is a well contained, finite task.

But this direct approach does not work well on larger scale tasks and goals. And that is Kay's key point in this book- the direct approach will work reasonably across short range finite tasks, but most of our real goals and desires are complex, and far from clearly defined. They have to be approached indirectly, often in small steps, and with some awareness that what we think we want may not actually be what we want when we get somewhere near it. We may only discover our true goal by starting out in its general direction, and refining our criteria for success as we go along. Kay sees true problem solving as humble, adaptive and iterative, and accepting of the risk of events changing everything. It sees consistency as an unusual and possibly maladaptive behaviour.

He is largely writing against direct problem solving, and against the arrogance of one person claiming to be able to encompass everyone's needs within his scheme. So for example the folly of Le Corbusier in wanting to design "a machine for living", or economists being disappointed when the subjects of their experiments failed to live up to their models of their behaviour, and the idiocies of planned economies are well exposed. To some extent Kay is apologising for his earlier life when he was a consultant with a model.

The affinity between the iterative adaptation described by Why Evolution Is True evolution in biology and the iterative adaptations made by the multiple actors in a free market is well drawn.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful By Houman Tamaddon on July 10, 2011
Format: Hardcover
I read a book review in WSJ and thought that the book sounded interesting. As I read the book, I thought that there was just not enough material to fill a book and that the concepts could be presented better in an article. At the end of the book I found out that the idea was originally presented in an article in the Financial Times in 2004. I have not read the original article but I recommend that readers obtain the article and perhaps skip the book.

The concept of obliquity, reaching goals indirectly, is interesting but it can be a bit like reading about time travel. It just never works perfectly. For example, assume someone sets out to write a book that is regarded as fine literature but instead ends up with a book that is regarded as a "fun trashy read". The book becomes widely popular, a movie is made from it and the auhtor ends up making lots of money. John Kay would argue that the author was successful (because she became wealthy) because she approached her goal obliquely. But her goal wasn't to make money - it was to write a fine book. So did she reach her goal? Also, even if you buy Kay's thesis, there is no practical value. If you plan to reach your goal indirectly then it is not indirect anymore. Just like you cannot plan spontaneity - it just has to happen.

Kay also chooses to see all events through the prism of his model. For example, he talks about Richard Fuld, the former CEO of Lehman. Fuld became wealthy (which was his direct goal) but drove Lehman into bankruptcy. That does not support Kay's thesis. Fuld achieved his goal directly, but somehow Kay massages the narrative to support his thesis. He argues that Fuld failed (since Lehman failed) because he aimed for wealth instead of more worthy goals.

The concept of obliquity is interesting but I don't think it warrants reading an entire book about it.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search