Buy New
$26.62
Qty:1
  • List Price: $29.95
  • Save: $3.33 (11%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Sell yours for a Gift Card
We'll buy it for $9.16
Learn More
Trade in now
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Of Grammatology Paperback – January 8, 1998

ISBN-13: 000-0801858305 ISBN-10: 0801858305 Edition: Corrected

Buy New
Price: $26.62
29 New from $24.21 30 Used from $17.75
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
$26.62
$24.21 $17.75
Best%20Books%20of%202014

Frequently Bought Together

Of Grammatology + Writing and Difference + Dissemination
Price for all three: $69.32

Buy the selected items together
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Year
Best Books of 2014
Looking for something great to read? Browse our editors' picks for 2014's Best Books of the Year in fiction, nonfiction, mysteries, children's books, and much more.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 456 pages
  • Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press; Corrected edition (January 8, 1998)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801858305
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801858307
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 1 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (35 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #65,337 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

The translation is a noble job, and we should be grateful to have this distinguished book in our hands... [Spivak's] situating of Derrida among his precursors—Nietzsche, Freud, Heidegger, Husserl—and contemporaries—Lacan, Foucault, and the elusive animal known as structuralism—is very lucid and extremely useful.

(Michael Wood New York Review of Books)

The tool-kit for anyone who wants to empty the 'presence' out of any text he has taken a dislike to. A handy arsenal of deconstructive tools are to be found in its pages, and the technique, once learnt, is as simple, and as destructive, as leaving a bomb in a brown paper bag outside (or inside) a pub.

(Roger Poole Notes and Queries)

There is cause for rejoicing in the translation of De la grammatologie... Just as Derrida discloses in Rousseau a writer who distrusts writing and longs for the proximity of the self to its voice, so Spivak approaches Derrida through the structure of his diction; no ideas but in the words themselves.

(Denis Donoghue New Republic)

Reading Derrida was the shock of a decentering, the critical shift into a world of the interminable movement of difference, the crisis of any closure. Of Grammatology was and remains the most tightly worked... and exemplary... demonstration of the science of this shift and crisis.

(Canto)

One of the major works in the development of contemporary criticism and philosophy.

(J. Hillis Miller, Yale University)

Language Notes

Text: English (translation)
Original Language: French

Customer Reviews

This volume is central to Derrida's project and is, perhaps, his single most important work.
D. Fineman
I am one of those who "loved" the work done by Derrida, and I give it 5-stars, with a recommendation to enjoin the reading with the help of Howells.
barryb
Sadly, all such believers have been taken in by an extraordinarily elaborate smoke and mirror illusion that cannot withstand close analysis.
Martin Asiner

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

42 of 49 people found the following review helpful By H. Montandon on April 1, 2000
Format: Paperback
In the context of Derrida's early project - to provide a critique of the foundational human science - linguistics - Of Grammatology is an essential book. In it he develops ideas about "writing" and about the "trace", ideas which illuminate much about the modern science of linguistics. His work is an astringent when applied to other more "analytical" philosophers of language (e.g. John Searle).
Derrida's writing style may seem difficult at first, until one realizes that it embodies two other important ideas - play and undecideability. Of Grammatology is not exactly a book of philosophy, and not exactly a book on linguistics, and not exactly a literary work but one which rests uneasily among these three disciplines. By not drawing conclusions, by keeping in play many concepts at once, Derrida manages to provide provocative ideas on mental representations while at the same time instantiating these ideas in the ebb and flow of the work itself.
Because of its kalidescopic style, the book can be read for the pure enjoyment of a rambunctious entertainment, and as an important philosophical text, and as a satire, and as profoundly serious.
As the academic furor over "decontruction" dies down, Derrida's work perhaps can begun to be read for its human importance. Those who value an insistent questioning will find a champion here.
4 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
32 of 40 people found the following review helpful By D. Fineman on April 3, 2004
Format: Paperback
This volume is central to Derrida's project and is, perhaps, his single most important work. In it, one finds the essentail contentions that inform his other essays. Whether one views, from the analytic tradition, these concepts as indulgent rubish or as culmination of a pre-Socratic force hidden under the ubiquitous effects of Plato and Aristotle, they are critical in understanding the disjunctions of philosophy.
While Derrida's writing may be difficult because it is both dense and playful, allusive and iconoclastic,these presentational "quirks" are not empty but tied to the basic structures of his argumentation.
Since its publication, popular characterizations of this book have attributed to it positions it does not hold. Derrida is, among his other gifts, a scholar of the first order and behind his statements are close readings of many of the philosphical greats that preceded his effort. This is not the babbling of the manic mind but a huge encounter with the dominant tradition of interpretation.
Such a gigantic target cannot be exhausted in one volume, but even if one wishes to affirm the analytic tradition, this volume should be read with the respect and care one gives a worthy enemy.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
13 of 15 people found the following review helpful By Perplexed on April 22, 2011
Format: Paperback
I was unable to figure out what this book meant. I kept reading, hoping things would get clearer, but I got the impression that the language just kept on going round in self referential circles, not actually talking about anything clear that I could grasp. It's like, just when I thought it was about to come out and say something that made sense, it seemed to end up saying something else instead. Infuriating. Can someone please sum up what Derrida was trying to say here?
6 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
26 of 33 people found the following review helpful By Craig G Cram on March 19, 2000
Format: Paperback
Having spent many frustrating hours looking for the substance in Derrida's many labyrinthine works, I make this suggestion to others: `Of Grammatology' is the thread text to start your wonderings through the rest of Derrida's thought.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 10 people found the following review helpful By dhydavid on March 27, 2012
Format: Paperback
First, the translation is not so much of a translation at all. We know that many French words were borrowed into English. But their usage in English is very different from French. Even if the word looks similar or the same, you cannot just leave it in your translation without translating it. For example, "exergue" means "a space on a coin, token, or medal usually on the reverse below the central part of the design" according to the online Merriam-Webster dictionary. But in French, in addition to this meaning, it can also mean "citation placée hors-texte, à droite en début d'ouvrage, d'article ou de chapitre, qui illustre le propos du texte." (i.e. "citation placed on a seperate page outside the text on the right at the beginning of a work, of an article, or of a chapter to illustrate the point of the text". In fact the exergue is quite easily understandable in French. But if you put it directly into English, it is much less understandable. What does it have to do with a coin? Thus a good translator would use a normal English word to convey the same meaning. It is obvious that Spivak is a great scholar who knows a lot. It is probably not a problem for her to use "exergue" in the French way in an English text, since she understands the word and it it not a problem for her and also it might sound more impressive than an ordinary English word. Sometimes scholars try to use big words to just sound erudite. I have no objection to using big words as long as the usage is justified. But using big words to sound more impressive is just pretentious. Thus in this translation there are many problems with this kind of lack of translation by using the original French term. Derrida is difficult to read. But he is much better in French.Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
14 of 19 people found the following review helpful By Flubjub on March 29, 2007
Format: Paperback
Derrida's thought is the primary reason why I inevitably feel an urge to put quotation marks around so many of the conceptual labels in my own writing; he initiates a needful misgiving: Do we really know what we are speaking about when we attempt to speak philosophically? Or is our language so subverted, displaced, and otherwise (blindly) ideological that a lot of the theoretical malarkey that academics put forth just seems to beg the age-old questions of knowledge, truth, meaning, etc.? But wait. We shouldn't lose sight of the fact that Derrida's writing shies away, almost essentially, from authoritative positioning in such matters because his own writing is subject to the same blind alleys and provisionalism that all writing is. In this respect, his writing is always, in a way, winking and playful, but admittedly in an rigorous and sometimes difficult way.

Is this book difficult? Yes, you bet it is! But I assure you that it's is as close to entry-level Derrida as any other book written by him. I first encountered the thinking of Derrida in a very watered-down gloss on his theory in postmodernist primer; this intrigued me to pursue him further, to read such things as Beginner's Guides and Short Introductions (which I definitely recommend to those who have either no prior experience with him or no great familiarity with the other thinkers he addresses in Of Grammatology--Saussure, Rousseau, etc.). Of course, you'll discover that these tidy little intros can be oversimplifying in places, but they at least get you to the general neighborhood before your set out on your own.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?