| ||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the Best of the Campaign Series,
By
This review is from: Okinawa 1945: The Last Battle (Campaign) (Paperback)
Former Green Beret Gordon L. Rottman provides an excellent summary of America's last great amphibious invasion of the Second World War in Osprey's Campaign #96, Okinawa 1945. Quite simply, this is one of the better titles in Osprey's campaign series and shows that it is possible to pack a great deal about a major military operation into a 96-page format. This book is particularly useful as a case study for military officers, thanks to the author's attention to many pertinent details that escape most civilian authors. Overall, Okinawa 1945 is a "must-have" for anyone interested in the later stages of the Pacific War.Although Rottman follows the standard Osprey campaign format, the opening chapters of this volume are far more in-depth than virtually all the other titles in the series. An 11-page introduction covers the history and terrain of Okinawa, as well as the American strategic debate about whether to invade Okinawa or Formosa. The section on opposing plans is also quite detailed, totaling 10 pages. Seven pages are used to cover opposing high-level commanders on both sides. Another 12 pages are used to cover opposing forces, including succinct but detailed discussions of tactical organization and strength and weaknesses of each major unit. Pertinent characteristics are included; such as each US Army division in the invasion was about 1,000 infantrymen under strength due to a shortage of replacements and the fact that one of the two Japanese divisions on the island had no organic artillery. Taken together, Rottman provides a far more detailed introduction to the campaign than any other Osprey title, by spending fully 52% of the volume on the background material. Unfortunately, the strength of the introduction leads to the weakness of the main campaign narrative that - while good - is overly succinct. The invasion itself is covered in 33 pages: sections on the initial landings, the continuing offensive, actions at sea, and the push southward. There are three color battle scenes: Japanese suicide boats at Naha, Marines reducing a bunker and the virtual annihilation of the US 193rd Tank Battalion on 19 April 1945. There are a total of five 2-D maps (strategic situation, Okinawa, the initial landings, the Ie Shima assault, and the withdrawal of the 32nd Army)and three 3-D "Birds Eye View" maps (the Japanese counteroffensive on May 4-6, 1945, the Battle for Sugar Loaf Hill, and the final stand in the south). The author also effectively uses footnotes at the end of each section to provide additional details. Okinawa 1945 has a great many strengths. The author's discussion of terrain and weather (e.g. the impact of rain on operations) greatly enhances the reader's appreciation for the operational environment. Rottman also makes very good use of statistics, particularly concerning military and civilian casualties. For example, I was unaware that 153 of 354 American tanks used on Okinawa were knocked out by the Japanese - a 43% loss rate for US armor. Nor was I aware that fully one-third of Okinawa's civilian population died in the campaign. The author also covers the challenges of civil-military operations (CMO); the US military had to screen and care for over 285,000 indigenous civilians on Okinawa. The introduction of some new weapons - such as the American 75mm recoilless rifles is discussed, as well as how both sides adapted their tactics based upon lessons learned from previous island battles. In particular, the Japanese adoption of defense-in-depth and attritional tactics allowed the Americans to get ashore at low cost, but provided the basis for a bloody, protracted campaign. Finally, the author provides a superb order of battle for both sides, including information on support units such as signal, engineer, medical, quartermaster, and MPs. Even the US Marine Corps' three canine platoons are included. The only real disadvantage of Okinawa 1945 - which is the overly short shrift given to the main battles on the Shuri Line - is not the author's fault, but rather due to Osprey's size limits. The last six weeks of the campaign are covered in about six pages, which leaves room for only a bare-bones account. No eyewitness accounts are incorporated into the campaign narrative, which could have been used to add intensity and grunt-level perspective. Otherwise, the campaign seems just like flags moving on a map, without real soldiers bleeding and dying. The maps are also a bit inadequate, particularly since no map depicts the initial battles or dispositions on the Machinato Line. The question of General Buckner's operational plans is also studiously avoided; over 7,600 Americans died on Okinawa and the question should have been raised if these losses were excessive. Due to the Japanese concentration of most of their forces in the south of the island, Buckner was able to land his troops and occupy the vital airfields and more than two-thirds of the island at the cost of fewer than 500 dead. The Americans came to Okinawa to get the airfields and they succeeded in seizing them at very low cost. Was it really necessary to engage the remaining Japanese garrison - hopelessly trapped in one corner of the island - in a bloody attritional battle for over 80 days? With so many Japanese garrisons bypassed across the Pacific, it seems odd that Buckner never considered sealing the Japanese 32nd Division off and slowly reducing them to impotence by bombardment and starvation. Particularly given the fact that the Joint Chiefs of Staff knew of the impending Atomic Bomb raids, it seems odd that so many American leaders would endorse an attritional battle like Okinawa at this stage of the war.
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Too much detail and not enough context,
This review is from: Okinawa 1945: The Last Battle (Campaign) (Paperback)
Okinawa 1945: The Last Battle (Campaign, 96)by Gordon Rottman is packed full of details concerning the Okinawa landings. If one wants to merely know about troop movements then this is the book for you. However, the battle was about more than troop movments. As, such Rottman's book seems sterile. Thie is espically true after reading Ospery's other books about the War in the Pacific, espically Iwo Jima and Tarawa.What is missing from the book is any context for the battle or any notion that men fought the battle. Okinawa was the last major battle of the War and resulted in a devesting loss of life. Rottman cites the statistics, but in order to understand the battle mere statistics are insufficent. The Ospery format certainly limits the ability of Rottman to move beyond the basics of the battle. However, the books on Iwo Jima and Tarawa prove that it can be done.
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Mediocre Review of This Final Battle,
By Mike Dillemuth (Virginia) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Okinawa 1945: The Last Battle (Campaign) (Paperback)
All in all, this book provides a great deal of data but is superficial in its narrative. There is a lot of information on the equipment, terrain, and military units involved in the Battle of Okinawa. The campaign is then covered from pages 51-83. This is only a third of the book. Nevertheless, the book does cover the entire campaign, albeit in a vague manner.The chapter on opposing forces is a tedious read. For example, on page 49, he describes "...artillery battalions with 36 X 150 mm howitzers, 8 x150 mm guns, 8 x 240 mm howitzers..." Although the author gives detailed information, his writing style is cumbersome. This type of information is better suited in a table or chart, not a paragraph. The captions by the photos are also cluttered with nomenclature. Instead of referencing a BAR, the author repeatedly references a .30 cal M1918A2 Browning Automatic Rifle. This nomenclature heavy writing style simply uses up precious space. On a positive note, other related information is provided in the narrative. This includes the identity of commanding officers and where a particular division was formed. Another example is found on page 52 where he discusses the origin of the term K-BAR as a slang name for the Marine Corps' fighting knife. Apparently, the manufacturer changed the company name when a customer stated he had killed a "BAR" (i.e.: bear) with one of their knives; hence the term K-BAR. The battle on Ie Shima is a good example of the author's convoluted writing style. This narrative is two paragraphs long. Unfortunately, the author spends almost half the text describing the island's geography and location, to include latitude and longitude. This is useless information that only takes up valuable space. Osprey books are short by design. The author should have remained focused on the battle itself. Sadly, this book suffers from a lack of sufficient 2D tactical maps. The few maps included in the book are cluttered and difficult to grasp. Also, there is no map covering the overall campaign. This shortcoming is noticeable due to the convoluted and difficult writing style. A good map would have gone a long way in helping the reader follow the action. The 3D Bird's Eye view maps are only marginally better. On the plus side, this book contains a wide selection of black and white pictures. The author does a great job of pointing out interesting details in the photos. For example, on page 60, he reveals that the stains on the soldier's helmets were deliberately made to provide camouflage. Unfortunately, many of the photos are out of sync with the text. For example, on page 48, the author includes a photo of the well known war correspondent Ernie Pyle who was killed in the battle of Ie Shima. Too bad this photo is in the section on Imperial Japanese forces. Ernie Pyle's death is then described in the Ie Shima narrative on pg. 69. This is where the photo should be located. Bottom line: This book contains a great deal of data on the battle of Okinawa. Any reader interested in specific details on equipment, geography, and tables of organization will find this book useful. Unfortunately, the narrative is somewhat confusing and superficial. Not a bad book but not a great one either.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|