160 of 172 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
To use for food you must remove the lacquer, December 17, 2002
This review is from: Old Dutch Copper Beating Bowls and Whisk, Set of 3 (Kitchen)
IF USED FOR COOKING YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO REMOVED THE LACQUER:
Based on the literature on this web site, when I bought these bowls, I thought unless you cooked with them (namely heated them up with food in them), you could leave the lacquer on. However, once I bought the bowls, the directions said if used with food, the lacquer should be removed using a lacquer remover.
REMOVING THE LACQUER IS COSTLY, TIME CONSUMING AND MESSY:
That being said and looking at the laminate removers out there, most are made of methylene chloride a deadly poison. I opted for a more expensive safer citrus lacquer remover. Also you need to polish them (on the outside, to compensate for the loss of the lacquer) This lacquer remover, brush, gloves and scrubber almost tripled the cost of these bowls. I'm still not sure the lacquer had to be removed to use for mixing other food items, but I didn't want to risk lacquer coming off in my food, if this coating was not be left on there.
WHEN THE LACQUER IS OFF THE BOWLS TARNISH:
Once you take the lacquer off the bowls have exposed copper for providing extra lift to your eggs. However, when they are exposed to air they tarnish.
IF YOU ARE USING FOR OTHER THAN TO INCREASE VOLUME IN EGGS, MAYBE NOT THE BEST BUY:
I originally bought these bowls to mix up eggs for scrambled eggs and for other items as pancakes. I like the little ring that made them easy to hold onto. This is why they were purchased, not to fluff eggs. Also, these bowls have round bottoms and will easily roll off the countertop if unbalanced. This is better for decoration and fluffing eggs than day to day use.
A GOOD BUY IF FOR DECORATION ONLY:
Given that including the need to remove the lacquer and the continuous polishing required after, is most useful for fluffing eggs only, I would opt for these pans at this price for decoration only.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Great value, September 21, 2002
This review is from: Old Dutch Copper Beating Bowls and Whisk, Set of 3 (Kitchen)
These bowls are of fine quality copper. They are made of medium weight copper plate. I prefer to have one of thick heavy weight copper to resist dents. Unlike stainless steel, copper is a soft material. Anyway all the bowles I saw in the market are of medium weight and cost twice as much. You may find a thick copper bowl in an antique shop. The smallest bowl is too small for any job. The other two bowls are ok.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Pretty nice, November 25, 2002
This review is from: Old Dutch Copper Beating Bowls and Whisk, Set of 3 (Kitchen)
Just bought these bowls as a gift for someone after reading how copper reacts better with eggs to make lighter souffles. The bowls do look good but they arent stunning like in the other reviews. The brass handles do detract from the look a little. They are medium weight and the biggest one will hold about 1.5 quarts (not that big but more than enough for mixing eggs). I have seen nicer copper bowls at williams sonoma but they are twice the price for just one bowl.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No