29 of 32 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Bittersweet - Leave well enough alone!, July 31, 2003
This review is from: Old Town in the Green Groves: Laura Ingalls Wilder's Lost Little House Years (Hardcover)
I enjoyed reading this book, but at the same time, felt sadness. Cynthia Rylant did a good job of capturing some of the spirit from the other books, but I feel that the reason Laura herself didn't write about this time in her life is because she wanted to forget it. The family experienced so much sadness during this time and maybe she didn't want others to know about it. While reading it, I just kept thinking about how Laura would feel if she knew people were reading this.
I first received the complete set of Little House books when I was 9. I'm 30 now & still read the complete set every fall. I won't put this book with my precious & well-worn set because I will never consider it a real part of the series.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
24 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
This is NOT a Little House book!, December 19, 2002
By A Customer
This review is from: Old Town in the Green Groves: Laura Ingalls Wilder's Lost Little House Years (Hardcover)
Let me begin by saying that Cynthia Rylant is an accomplished author, and has written several books that I've read and enjoyed.
This is not one of them.
If you are at all familiar with the Little House books, the style of this book will appear glaringly unsimilar. The original series had the unique feature of progressing in reading/comprehension difficulty as the age of the characters progressed--thus, Little House in the Big Woods was the 'easiest' read, and "These Happy Golden Years" was the most advanced. Using this criteria, "Green Groves" does not fit into the space between "On the Banks of Plum Creek" and "By the Shores of Silver Lake." It reads too simply.
Additionally, the conversations between the characters will make you squirm; Laura's books may be wholesome, but they never were saccharine! Rylant has them speaking like "The Beverly Hillbillies," when they aren't being 'cutesy-wootsey;' this is certainly not a feature of any of the original books! I think that the stilted dialog was one of the major disappointments of this book.
Even if the dialog had been true to the originals, however, it is still disconcerting to have someone step forward and claim to know the intimate family details (right down to the dinner conversation!) of a family not her own, and not her contemporaries. As a Laura Ingalls Wilder program presenter, I am fairly well-informed about her life and times, and I've read the original books more times than I can count. (I've worn out three sets...) Still, I would not profess to be able to step into Laura's shoes, and write about her life as if I had been there.
I think that the most upsetting thing of all is that the original, wonderful books are being buried in a sea of look-alike (as far as the covers go!), wannabe, spin-off books, and that today's children might miss the excitement of knowing Laura and her family. What a loss.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Mixed Feelings, August 4, 2004
I love the original Little House books, so when I saw this novel claiming to detail "the missing years" I thought I'd give it a try. It was interesting to read someones view of what may have happened during those years between "On the Banks of Plum Creek" and "By the Shores of Silver Lake." But that's just it-what MAY have happened. The main structure of the story was true, but the events were fictionalized or made up.
Also-if Laura didn't write about these years herself, there must have been a reason. It almost seems an invasion of privacy to guess about what happened to make her not want to write about the time. If she had wanted us to know, she would have told us.
I did enjoy this book. But if I ever buy it, I won't put it on my shelf between "On the Banks of Plum Creek" and "By the Shores of Silver Lake." I don't consider it part of the "Laura Years" and I don't think it should be listed as so on the back of the book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No