51 of 55 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Olympus is back in the game!, February 27, 2007
After a few years of struggling to have a winner, someone at Olympus has gotten on a roll. The FE-240 is a great camera for someone wanting a bit more zoom, but in a very small package.
The first thing you'll notice is the slim body, thinner than most 3x zoom cameras. The finish is nice, and camera appears solid in your hands. The 5x zoom has average smoothness and noise. That little extra reach can really make all the difference.
The selection dial makes this a joy for someone new to photography. There's an excellent photo & description of each mode, and a very helpful "guide" setting.
The only "cons" on this camera are that it uses the xD memory card instead of the easy to find SD cards, and that it doesn't have an anti-shake system (the anti-blur mode uses a high ISO).
It would be hard to find a camera even close in both function and style in roughly the same price range. But look at the black finish, and you'll really fall in love!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
27 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Olympus has been the best, now succumbed to "afterthoughts in engineering", July 6, 2007
This review is from: Olympus Stylus FE-240 7.1MP Digital Camera with Dual Image Stabilized 5x Optical Zoom (Black) (Electronics)
I bought this 9 days ago, along with a 512MB Olympus Brand xD memory card. I was amazed at the size and the features. My first digital camera in 1996 was an Olympus, and my expectations were so much higher now... I'm right on the verge of returning it...why?
A. The manual is weak, mentions memory card only in passing. But lost near the bottom of a page, it does say
"memory card - see advanced manual".
In a hurry in my hotel room to fire photos, I must find and fire up my laptop to use this "advanced manual on a CD". This is a classic symptom of missed deadlines when they burn CDs to cover for poorly written manuals, likely conceived before the product was even manufactured.
B. Missing pixel in top right corner of black display shows 'green'. Right out of the box, a very visible, imperfection
C. Odd Modes, seem promising but fail
I. Fireworks mode!! Wow, how long have I wanted this!! Now at 4th of July fireworks, the photos come out like doubleexposure on slow film. Nice effect, if you like Monet, but not expected from a camera.
II. Still haven't figured out the cryptic green lines in 'Panorama' mode.
D. Last straw... taking photos of fireworks, experimenting to find the best mode, I must wait for a PROGRESS BAR "processing....." for 5-15 seconds between photos, Not even my 1996 Olympus made me wait that long.
E. Bonus... the battery charger and power cord is bigger than the camera. The battery looks just like a cell phone batter.... $60-$99 at Amazon... $22 for 2 on eBay.
F. Comes with video cable for slide shows on your newer television or laptop.
G. Beautiful, helpful, although somewhat crowded display.
The zoom indicator is very good, showing white until you reach max then a red area to indicate you've moved from optical to digital zoom.
H. Fits nicely in hand, with supplied wriststrap so you can be ready at all times for a extemporaneous shot.
I. Has a threaded spot for a standardc tripod, a video mode (AVI) and some nifty preset modes. HOWEVER when you move to any new setting and back to whence you came many of your settings are gone, ESPECIALLY turning the flash OFF or "always on" ... seems to always go back to Red Eye mode... a very time consuming and sloooow mode.
Bottom line, cute, handy but well beneath the Olympus reputatio. I believe that it suffers from poor or non-existent Q.A., a mad dash to market leaving QA for the client to discover on theirown.
It needs,
1. a couple smaller resolutions mode, i.e. 800x600 and 1280x800
2. One really good manual
3. Option to charge the camera via USB cable attached to computer
4. Inspection on production line for things like missing pixels in LCD
5. absolutely NO "processing time" while saving photos at lower resolutions.... time between photos should be far less than it was in 1996!!
6. Optical View finder
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No