Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes [Paperback]

Charles Hartshorne (Author)

Product Details

• Paperback: 160 pages
• Publisher: State University of New York Press (June 30, 1984)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0873957717
• ISBN-13: 978-0873957717
• Product Dimensions: 8.4 x 5.4 x 0.4 inches
• Shipping Weight: 7 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 3.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #643,107 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

69 of 73 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A word on what process theology is, May 27, 2000

By 

Michael Ham (Monterey, CA USA) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (Paperback)

To give you an idea of the underlying assumptions of this book, let me quote a definition of process philosophy:

PROCESS PHILOSOPHY, a speculative world view which asserts that basic reality is constantly in a process of flux and change. Indeed, reality is identified with pure process. Concepts such as creativity, freedom, novelty, emergence, and growth are fundamental explanatory categories for process philosophy. This metaphysical perspective is to be contrasted with a philosophy of substance, the view that a fixed and permanent reality underlies the changing or fluctuating world of ordinary experience. Whereas substance philosophy emphasizes static being, process philosophy emphasizes dynamic becoming. Although process philosophy is as old as the 6th-century BC Greek philosopher Heraclitus, renewed interest in it was stimulated in the 19th century by the theory of evolution. Key figures in the development of modern process philosophy were the British philosophers Herbert Spencer, Samuel Alexander, and Alfred North Whitehead, the American philosophers Charles S. Peirce and William James, and the French philosophers Henri Bergson and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. Whitehead's Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (1929) is generally considered the most important systematic expression of process philosophy.

Contemporary theology has been strongly influenced by process philosophy. The American theologian Charles Hartshorne, for instance, rather than interpreting God as an unchanging absolute, emphasizes God's sensitive and caring relationship with the world. A personal God enters into relationships in such a way that he is affected by the relationships, and to be affected by relationships is to change. So God too is in the process of growth and development. Important contributions to process theology have also been made by such theologians as William Temple (1881-1944), Daniel Day Williams (1910-73), Schubert Ogden (1928- ), and John Cobb, Jr. (1925- ).

36 of 39 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars A pleasure to read, April 24, 2002

By 

Robert S. Lewis (Marietta, GA USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (Paperback)

If you read theology for fun, this is the book for you! Hartshorne is often convincing but always interesting. He knows his subject and presents it well. His writing style is clear and does not require that the reader have a strong background. I have only two reservations. The first is that his arguments are occasionally summaries of points he makes in greater detail elsewhere, and so he is a little less convincing here, and that no one should read this book at night if they have to get up early the next day. Insomniacs beware!
On the other hand, if you want a book to wake someone up, this is an excellent gift.
I enjoyed the way his vision makes some of the more pecular things Jesus said sound perfectly reasonable. How often has anyone addressed why you should love your neighbor as yourself? Why should you give to everyone who asks of you and not just the deserving? What does it mean to love God with your whole heart.

22 of 27 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Intriguing work, but hastily done, September 20, 2001

By 

John D. Faucher (Greater Los Angeles, California) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (Paperback)

Hartshorne has noticed what most of the rest of us have: God cannot have power over everything, know everything, and be all good. The difference between Hartshorne and the rest of us is that Hartshorne attempts to explain how God can exist in some other mode than as the impossible being taught to us by medieval scholars and modern fundamentalists.

Hartshorne posits six basic mistakes we make in thinking about God. As an example, he says that our traditional ideas about omnipotence make a pretty pathetic God. We usually think of power as the power of the tyrant, that is, the power to control others. If God controls all of us, then everything is His will. This mistake, in Hartshorne's estimation, leads to a great deal of double-talk (he is rather withering in his critique of St. Thomas Aquinas, for instance). But we can think of power as the power of love or creation: God can create a world of beauty worth worshiping.

Similarly with omniscience: if God knows all that is to happen, then God is little more than the tyrant who controls everything. Hartshorne suggests that God knows all that has happened, but that our individual decisions, and the future they create, are hidden from Him.

This is all very interesting. Unfortunately, Hartshorne appears to have written this in a feverish attempt to get it all out. While he claims a desire to write for lay people who think about religion, he descends into philosophical jargon and long-winded, knotty paragraphs at times; at others, he is almost folksy in his diction. After getting bogged down several times in his argument, I found I could follow him much better by skimming the section and paragraph headings, plowing through the text where I was interested or didn't understand the basic argument. I think this book could have benefited from a longer gestation.