28 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Editorializing, October 3, 2006
This review is from: One Nation Under Guns: An Essay on an American Epidemic (Speaker's Corner) (Paperback)
Not so much a researched and analyzed work as an opinion article in the form of a book. Mr. Grossman sets out with a premise in mind and then picks and chooses his "data" specifically to support his pre-drawn conclusion. Objectivity played no role in this work whatsoever. Reading this is a waste of time unless you would like to read a case study in how to marginalize any opinion other that your own. If that is your wish, this is an excellent book.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
11 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Balderdash, December 25, 2006
This review is from: One Nation Under Guns: An Essay on an American Epidemic (Speaker's Corner) (Paperback)
Like Sarah Brady and her ilk, this book is full of factual errors, absurdities, fabrications, and outright lies. For example, the author claims that anyone can buy a .50-caliber machine gun on the spot at gun shows. That ludicrous assertion displays an irresponsible ignorance of the law and what really goes on at gun shows. Even the photo on the cover is a gross deception -- it is unlawful for a juvenile to own or handle a handgun, or handgun ammunition, without a parent's written permission. The only value of this book is its role as a window into the minds of anti-gun radicals. Anyone who, like Diogenes, seeks honesty should look elsewhere. If the author is as wreckless with a gun as he is with facts and his exercise of his freedom of speech and of the press, stay well out of shooting range!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
What's the opposite of "factual" ?, April 2, 2007
This review is from: One Nation Under Guns: An Essay on an American Epidemic (Speaker's Corner) (Paperback)
I have followed the various gun-related debates and concerns in our country for over 32 year now. I have lived in both restrictive and open states. I consider myself pretty well informed on most of the topics covered by this author, but I'm always checking for more information.
Unfortunately, this book proved to be just another tired rehash of the anti-gun misinformation I've seen on the Brady Campaign web site. "We need more laws controlling guns." Why, when criminals - by definition - don't obey the law? For that matter why bother, when the convicted violent criminals are released back into the public despite their records? "Statistics show" ...anything you want them to show, when taken out of context, as most of these are. "Assault weapons..." are defined by the military as capable of fully automatic fire (think "machine gun") and as such have been banned from general purchase since the 1934. Even the factually challenged definition of "assault weapons" banned in the nineties described firearms that were used in .026 of One Percent(!) of firearms related crimes, according to the FBI.
Bottom line: There are an enormous number of factual errors in this document. There are many quotes from the Brady Campaign, including quotations attributed to individual members of that campaign. It's quite apparent that the author spent many hours with the anti-gun organizations. On the other hand, I saw no quotations or evidence that his research was more widely spread.
My recommendation: If you're reading this review, you're on the Internet. Do your own research from the data available out "here" if you want real facts about this topic, not to mention saving money since you don't have to buy a book. If you are merely looking for a good summation of the anti-gun lobby's platform, this book is a good resource. But PLEASE check his "facts" before agreeing to the premise. You'll find many if not most of them are incorrect.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No