34 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Holistic Natural Theology, August 20, 2008
This review is from: The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology (Paperback)
The enterprise called "natural theology"-- popularly understood to be the attempt to prove the existence of God "naturally," apart from any religious presuppositions-- has found a rather splotchy reputation in the gossip of "respectable" theologians and philosophers. Yet just as it was wise to question the defamatory gossip of "that girl" in high school, it is equally prudent for theologians and philosophers to critically reevaluate sullied subjects such as this.
The recent wave of interest in natural theology suggests that they are doing just that.
On the crest of this wave of interest, we find the distinguished Oxford Professor of Historical Theology, Alister McGrath. McGrath has asserted his position in the forefront of this subject by touching on natural theology in several of his written works in recent years, including The Science of God (2004), his three-volume Scientific Theology (2002-2003), as well as The Order of Things (2006).
In his most recent efforts, however, he has trained his focus specifically on a reassessment of "natural theology" both through the recent conference he held at Oxford in June 2008--"Beyond Paley: Renewing the Vision for Natural Theology"--and his latest book The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology (Blackwell Publishing, 384p, released April 2008).
In this new book, McGrath sets forth "to develop a distinctively Christian approach to natural theology, which retrieves and reformulates older approaches...." (3). Whereas the modern approach to natural theology--typified in the Boyle Lectures and Paley's Natural Theology--attempted to point to certain "proofs" as necessarily leading to the single logical conclusion of God, McGrath, employing a critical realist epistemology, suggests otherwise:
We argue that if nature is to disclose the transcendent, it must be "seen" or "read" in certain specific ways - ways that are not themselves necessarily mandated by nature itself. It is argued that Christian theology provides an interpretative framework by which nature may be "seen" in a way that connects with the transcendent. The enterprise of natural theology is thus one of discernment, of seeing nature in a certain way, of viewing it through a particular and specific set of spectacles. (3)
One question the reader might have at this point is, "Why redefine the concept instead of simply coining a new term?" McGrath maintains that the typical understanding of the term "natural theology"--i.e. "the enterprise of providing support for religious beliefs by starting from premises that neither are nor presuppose any religious beliefs" (a definition he borrows from William Alston)--is actually a particular construction of certain Enlightenment presuppositions concerning nature and reality that do not currently hold sway, and were not a part of the pre-modern approach to natural theology. As such, a restatement of the term "natural theology" is justified in part because it "retrieves" pre-modern approaches--especially those of medieval theologians. Moreover since, as McGrath demonstrates, the term "nature" is an "indeterminate concept" that is "conceptually malleable," it follows that "natural theology" would be likewise fluid and subject to reformulation.
It is somewhat disappointing, however, that a more systematic discussion was not given to these pre-modern approaches, especially since they seem to more precisely exemplify the vision McGrath is setting forth with his own project. When was the term "natural theology" first used? What are some ways it evolved through the centuries? While McGrath does indeed touch on pre-modern approaches, also footnoting sources in which we can explore this subject further, the fact that a "retrieval" was an integral part of his expressed thesis should be reason enough to allow for a more in-depth and explicit discussion on the subject. Such a rootedness in tradition would have made his case more clear and persuasive.
Although The Open Secret is written as an essay to open conversation, rather than as an exhaustive exposition, McGrath nonetheless structures a careful and compelling vision for natural theology. The introductory chapter provides an excellent thumbnail sketch of the territory to be covered. Beyond the introductory chapter, the book is divided into three parts. The first part of the book couches natural theology in the context of the human quest for transcendence, which manifests itself in several different ways. While this experience of, and yearning for transcendence has served for many as a signpost to the Christian God, McGrath makes the important point that that is not the only way such an experience can be interpreted. The second part of the book examines how natural theology can be raised from its Enlightenment presumptions about objectivity and universality, and be informed specifically by the theological vision of the Christian tradition. The final section expands the enterprise of natural theology beyond mere sense-making into a holistic engagement with Truth, encounter with Beauty, and practice of Goodness.
Truly The Open Secret is an astounding work of scholarship with much to offer, and on many different levels. For those interested in the apologetic implications of this renewed natural theology, McGrath does not disappoint. Instead of focusing the apologetic discussion on ontology (typical of modernity), McGrath's vision encourages an important shift in discussion to the epistemological assumptions underneath ontology that often go critically unexamined.
McGrath also demonstrates a shift from an objective, to a more subjective apologetic approach. The modern apologetic approach to natural theology attempted (naively) to assert an "objective" perspective completely absent of presuppositions upon which "proofs" for God could be placed. Since such objectivity is an illusion, and such "proofs" in nature can be interpreted in different ways, McGrath's apologetic approach is one emphasizing "resonance" rather than proof: "...with the Christian way of seeing things being affirmed to offer a robust degree of empirical fit with what is actually observed - the `best explanation' of a complex and multifaceted phenomenon." (17) It might be said that McGrath's is about the business of explaining why Christianity makes sense "from within" (i.e. "This is why Christianity makes sense to me"), rather than "from without" (i.e. "This proof demands that Christianity should make sense to you").
Although McGrath does offer some discussion on "best explanation," as well as pointing the reader to several resources through which this concept may be explored in more depth, it might be said that more discussion could have been warranted at this point. For example, if there is only one obvious "best explanation," how does it avoid becoming just another "proof," thus falling into the same mistake as modernity? It is not entirely clear whether or not McGrath allows for the possibility of multiple "best explanations" (i.e. a "tie" of two or more "best explanations"). Is the principle of multiple possible interpretations of nature also applied to "best explanation?" While he is not explicit at this point, McGrath's acknowledgement of the difficulties of establishing criteria for "best explanation," and the almost intuitive nature of identifying it would seem to suggest that this is the case.
Even with its difficulties (explicitly admitted to by McGrath), there are several reasons why this apologetic approach might be seen as superior to its modern predecessor. It is compelling both on a philosophical, as well as a theological front. On the philosophical level, the epistemology of critical realism which undergirds McGrath's perspective is extremely persuasive, taking the best (and leaving out the worst) of modern and post-modern ideas, and forming a cogent synthesis that is intellectually powerful. Although it is not entirely without problems, the coherence of such an epistemology should be universally recognizable. Once the elegance of this epistemology is acknowledged, the point of contact is established, and the non-believer can begin to perceive the necessity of faith (not blind faith) in the epistemological process.
In turn, this emphasis on the importance of faith makes it a compelling apologetic theologically, not in the least because it is faithful to the ancient Christian epistemological statement "I believe in order to understand." This approach catapults both faith and divine revelation into prominent positions in the process of knowing--much more so than the modern rationalist approach. Yet one might ask: "By beginning with a universally acceptable epistemology, isn't this, in practice, the same as the modern approach?" Not necessarily. Epistemology itself is not a "proof," but a capacity for knowledge. Because critical realism is inherently presuppositional, that starting point of conversation is itself a "religious presupposition."
What is more, whereas the modern approach to apologetics and natural theology was one that reduced "faith" and "revelation" into something that was merely cognitive and propositional, McGrath makes the important move (particularly in the final third of the book) of raising natural theology out of that intellectual quagmire, and into a holistic encounter with the Triune God--one that assents to Truth, beholds and loves Beauty, and pursues Goodness. The natural theology McGrath sets forth thus entails that for a person to truly perceive an encounter with God, they must do so from inside the Christian tradition, and this by a leap (though not a blind leap) of faith. Indeed as the old proverb says, "The proof of the pudding is in the eating."
However, the implications of...
Read more ›
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Supports a Somewhat Sophisticated Pantheism, October 22, 2009
This review is from: The Open Secret: A New Vision for Natural Theology (Paperback)
I was initially excited about the 21st century eruption of Natural Theology, not just by McGrath but by other authors. But this book is a major disappointment. The arguments are facile and poorly developed. I have defended McGrath before when he has been criticized for writing so many books that his thinking and his writing (sometimes the writing) suffers. I'm afraid with this book he has overreached. The book is heavily footnoted, but quite frankly this disingenuously creates a false veneer of well-researched scholarship. I consulted several of the books that he footnoted and found at least two of them that did not connect with the text. Also, I truly believe that he did not read all the books he footnoted.
Certainly, nature discloses God's handiwork, but McGrath claims far too much for nature: it simply isn't a reliable guide to Christian theology, as this term is normally used. I believe McGrath took his degree in biology or biochemistry and he seemingly can't shake his scientific background. Nature showing truth, goodness and beauty can be a valid imaginitive truth: but it is an ambiguous guide to rational truth. Keats, for example, realized that nature has a dark side and is tenuously interpenetrated with well-lit, convincing truth. I find his ideas disturbingly close to Emerson's and Thoreau's.
Finally, he seems determined not just to show how science and theology can be reconciled and even complementary, but he wants much more than this conjunction can yield. And in his rush to make nature/science a compelling aspect of Christian theology, he slights and ignores the New Testament and moves away from Christ. An argument for pantheism is the best this book can do and pantheism is not Christianity.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
