|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
34 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
76 of 84 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Nothing special,
By
93 of 104 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Loud, Underperforming, Overpriced, Overhyped,
By Sam I Am (USA) - See all my reviews However, I can NOT endorse his poor product, which is about 20 years behind the curve in vacuum technology. I had the Oreck vacuum for seven years. Right out of the box, the vacuum is so ear-splittingly loud that I had to wear ear-plugs when vacuuming. The suction is lousy, and you have to go over the same area a few times for it to pick up lints and fine dust. The filter bags are expensive and have to be replaced frequently, or it loses suction even more. The only advantage is that it is light, but you will get tired from having to re-vacuum the same area multiple times. I use Dyson now, and am very happy with its suction performance, though it has its share of flaws (see my review of Dyson for details). I use Oreck only for cleaning the stairs. It's clear that people are catching on that Oreck is now overpriced, and overmatched by its current competitions. Oreck is now resorting to giving away a free iron with a vacuum purchse, which doesn't make much sense. I'd advise Mr. Oreck to devote his energy to improve his increasingly outdated product, which will then be promoted through good word-of-mouth.
48 of 52 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
belt eater!,
By Newboles (CA.) - See all my reviews
38 of 41 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Oreck Has Problems,
By
53 of 59 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Buyers Beward!!!!,
I can't tell you how well the vacuum works, because when I was taking my $500+ vacuum out of the box, it snapped in half. This alone tells me it is not good quality. I have spent at least 3 hours on the phone, shipping it back, getting PARTIAL credit for my return...and have never received an apology!! Is this how they do business? I am still trying to get my account resolved, but when you call customer service they seem un-interested and there is no supervisor or manager to talk to, apparently they have really good working hours!! Unless you're up for a good fight and inferior quality (total opposite of what is advertised), I don't recommend dealing with this company. All I wanted was an apology and a product that worked...I guess I was asking for too much!!
27 of 29 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A great vacuum IF you know how to use it,
By
This review is from: Oreck XL 2000 Lightweight 8 lb. Upright Vacuum Cleaner (Kitchen)
I have owned two Oreck vacuums within the last ten years, both of which are still operational but I gave the former to a friend who was in desperate need of an upright vacuum (she still had one of those canister Electrolux vacuums that, unfortunately, seem to NEVER die).
Of all vacuums I have used I really love those from Oreck the best. They are super light weight, unlike competitors who call their vacuums lightweight, but they still weigh at least twice as much as the Oreck. Now, onto the suction and durability. The Oreck's suction is phenomenal, it picks up everything you throw at it and the only thing it will (sometimes, mostly it will pick them out) throw back out are items such as screws or nails (which you shouldn't vacuum up anyway). Many people who have reviewed the Oreck have complained that they have problems picking up even the lightest and smallest of objects, but I would like to ask all of them when the last time they changed the belt in their Oreck was. IF YOU DO NOT CHANGE THE BELT ANNUALLY, SUCTION WILL GREATLY DECLINE. I found this out the hard way. A few years back I noticed that my carpet (which is green) had a lot of lint on it and vacuuming did nothing to pick it up. The problem ended up being the belt, which hadn't been changed in I would say at least two years. I changed the belt and the vacuum began working as good as new. Also, letting the vacuum sit idle while running will wear out the belt much quicker (and emit a pungent odor) so I would recommend not doing this as it will greatly diminish the lifetime of your belt. I would say that the only true problem with this vacuum has been with the power cord. Somehow there is a short inside the handle (where the power cord connects to the vacuum) and unless you are tugging on the cord, the vacuum will not run. I have disassembled the handle and tried to fix the problem but it will not go away. The best remedy I have found has been to sandwich the cord between my hand and the handle and to tug on it slightly while running the vacuum, and it works great. All in all, I would not want to own another vacuum other than an Oreck due to their great power and super light weight design, They are excellent machines if properly maintained.
16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Smelly, problem-prone waste of money,
By Papa Bear (Gilbert, AZ USA) - See all my reviews A toothpick or anything more than the most inconsequential piece of paper clogs things up just south of the roller brush so you have to dismantle the tube, take off the bottom plate and fish the junk out with your fingers. Hair wraps around the roller brush, which is to be expected, but tends to wrap up in a gap between the wood of the roller brush and the end-caps such that you can't get it all out. Eventually this causes the bearings to heat up and seize, which is not to be expected. Oreck is unapologetic and doesn't think they should have to pay for this design flaw, so be ready to buy replacements frequently. For a point of reference, I have 4 girls and have replaced the roller brush 3 times in the last 3 years. The roller-brush I bought just 6 months ago seized just yesterday, and that's the final straw. The line on their bags that indicates when the bag is full dramatically overpromises - to maintain reasonable airflow you'll have to replace it long before it gets to the line. It's not worth the effort to try to use it on hard floors, and the belt location on one side of the roller brush means that you simply won't be able to position the vacuum to clean some edges. In the effort to make bag replacement fool-proof they made it such that you frequently can't tell if it's on right; at first I could hear an audible snap when everything was in place, but that stopped after 6 months or so. It seems like it's become louder as it's aged, but in all fairness it's just as likely that I'm more sensitive to it now that this thing annoys me so much. If I could give this vacuum less than one star, I would. Save your money - don't buy an Oreck.
44 of 53 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
-5 Stars,
By AlleyKat (The Big Apple) - See all my reviews
10 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Orek XL,
By
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Oreck 2000,
By |
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
$191.78
In Stock | ||