Customer Reviews


4 Reviews
5 star:    (0)
4 star:
 (1)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (2)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars It was a good purchase for our daughter
My dad wanted to buy my six-year-old daughter a digital camera for her birthday. It was hard finding one under $100 that actually worked well. From the reviews we chose this camera. It is very easy for our daughter to use. She takes great pictures and can see them right away. The camera memory only hold 18 or so pictures. She can plug it right into our TV to see the...
Published on March 18, 2006 by E. Parsons

versus
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars For my husband to carry to work.
I purchased this camera for my husband. Mainly because of the size and cost. It was to just be kept in his pocket and used on the construction job. Granted it was inexpensive but, none the less it should have at least worked. It wouldn't load onto the computer even after considerable time and much input from computer techies. Sending it back!!
Published on August 11, 2006 by D. Farrell


Most Helpful First | Newest First

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars For my husband to carry to work., August 11, 2006
This review is from: Oregon Scientific DS6200 2MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Silver) (Electronics)
I purchased this camera for my husband. Mainly because of the size and cost. It was to just be kept in his pocket and used on the construction job. Granted it was inexpensive but, none the less it should have at least worked. It wouldn't load onto the computer even after considerable time and much input from computer techies. Sending it back!!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Don't buy this worthless camera!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, August 21, 2006
This review is from: Oregon Scientific DS6200 2MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Silver) (Electronics)
My husband and I purchased this camera x 2 for our twins' 6th Bday presents. They took them on our family vacation the next week and we found that the batteries would not even last throughout the day. The kids had to take the batteries out of the camera to try to conserve them... and then quickly replace them when they found something they wanted to capture on 'film.' The cameras also came in a super-cheap faux-suade bag that fell apart within the first 3 days. I called Oregon Scientific and after waiting on hold for 15 minutes.. I finally spoke to a customer service rep who informed me that that is just how the cameras work and they will not take them back. No refund. No store credit. No apology! Unless the product is sent back within 30 days in the original, UNOPENED packaging, they will not refund your money. Do not waste your time and money with this cute, but totally-worthless camera. We will never buy from Oregon Scientific again.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars It was a good purchase for our daughter, March 18, 2006
This review is from: Oregon Scientific DS6200 2MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Silver) (Electronics)
My dad wanted to buy my six-year-old daughter a digital camera for her birthday. It was hard finding one under $100 that actually worked well. From the reviews we chose this camera. It is very easy for our daughter to use. She takes great pictures and can see them right away. The camera memory only hold 18 or so pictures. She can plug it right into our TV to see the pictures big. So far, we have not been able to get the software to bring the pictures up on the computer from our camera. We don't know if that's not possible with our 1998 computer or if we're doing it wrong. We haven't taken a whole lot of time to figure it out yet or contacted the company.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


12 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars Incorrect discription of product, January 29, 2006
By 
C. Howk (pasadena, ca United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Oregon Scientific DS6200 2MP ThinCam Digital Camera with Cradle (Silver) (Electronics)
We chose this camera for our kids specifically because the description of the product on Amazon.com said that it had rechargeable batteries. We are quite tired of consuming piles of AAA batteries for the kids' mp3 players, cameras, toys, etc. So a camera that came with rechargeable batteries - particularly one that charged them via the USB interface - sounded mighty attractive.

Imagine our disappointment when we opened the box and found that it contained 2 AAA Alkaline batteries - clearly labeled "Not Rechargeable!" The (rather skimpy) user's manual makes absolutely no mention of battery charging at all either.

The trouble is that the camera was our kid's Birthday present; it would be heartbreaking to take it back and return it to Amazon. So we have basically been duped by Amazon.

Not impressed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product