Product Features
|
Product Details
Would you like to give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
64 of 65 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Works well.. Troubleshooting hint...,
By
This review is from: Oregon Scientific THN132N Wireless Temperature Sensor (Kitchen)
I was prepared to write a bad review for this wireless sensor, but did a little additional troubleshooting before clicking to submit the review.
Yes, I replaced the sensor battery, switched channels, reset the unit and moved the receiver closer to it and it still didn't register on the receiver. Then I decided to check the batteries in the receiver. Not dead, but low. The receiver still showed the inside temperature and the atomic clock was working, but a fresh set of batteries for the receiver did the trick.
12 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Troubleshooting and Compatability,
This review is from: Oregon Scientific THN132N Wireless Temperature Sensor (Kitchen)
Thank you R. Whitaker for your review ... it saved me from throwing away a perfectly good sensor and buying another one! Note: If the sensor batteries die, you may need to pop the batteries on the base unit to get it to reset and find the sensor again (replacing the base unit batteries may not be necessary).
[...]
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Died quickly,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Oregon Scientific THN132N Wireless Temperature Sensor (Kitchen)
Had one, died after a month. Bought this replacement, died after 2 weeks. When it worked, it worked great. Just didn't work for long.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|