10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
This Book Changed My Life, September 22, 2002
This review is from: Origin of Eukaryotic Cells (Hardcover)
I believe that this book will one day be a collector's item because it first seriously advanced the idea that symbiosis is a primary mechanism of evolution.
For a reason I can't recall, I was hurrying through the stacks of the U. of Rochester Medical School Library in the very early 1970's. The title on the spine of one book happened to catch my eye, The Origin of Eukaryotic Cells. I didn't know what eukaryotic cells were. Impulsively, I took the book out and read a bit of it while standing in the stacks. Then I decided to check it out of the library. Over the next two weeks I read the whole book very carefully. I had very little scientific background, but I did remember that when I took freshman biology in 1953-54 at the U. of R. I thought that it looked to me as if parts of more complex single-celled microbes were, in fact, simpler microbes that had somehow gotten inside the more complex cells and stayed there.
This book confirmed that idea, and it changed my life because it renewed my interest in evolution. I began reading a great deal about it. I still read a lot about evolution. I've just finished reading Lynn Margulis' most recent book, Acquiring Genomes, written with Dorion Sagan, also more than just a good read. Both books advance the concept of symbiosis as a major cause of evolutionary change. They specify, by giving the details, one very important way, perhaps the most important way, in which evolution can occur in leaps and bounds rather than soley by the long-term acquisition of genetic mutations.
Anyone with a deep interest in evolution ought to read The Origin of Eukaryotic Cells. And perhaps they should buy up extant copies of it to pass on to their descendants as an investment.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Powerful ideas in a tough package, October 16, 2010
This review is from: Origin of Eukaryotic Cells (Hardcover)
I have long wanted to read the original work on the symbiotic theory of
eukaryotic cells. When I finally found this book I read it eagerly and
was not disappointed. It is full if interesting ideas, described with
lots of background and copious supporting evidence. The book was very
well-organized and for the most part very clearly argued. I found the
background on cellular evolution and the origin of life interesting,
though mostly for historical reasons. It was fascinating to see the
reasoning about lineages of organisms in the time before DNA sequencing
was possible. As deeply technical at is was, it was really fun and
engaging to read.
My background is in physics and computers and most of what I know about
microbiology I learned reading books like Paul Davies' "The Fifth
Miracle". I came to this book knowing the difference between mitosis
and meiosis, but was still completely floored by the vocabulary, or
really the nearly impenetrable jargon. That didn't badly put me off,
however, I just put on my hip waders and treated it as a large set of
puzzles. How long would it take me to figure out, for example, what an
"obligate aerobe" was or the meaning of the related "microaerophilic"?
I find Neal Stephenson's books bracing for the same reason (though to a
much smaller degree). In Margulis' defense, I suspect that furiously
slinging jargon was part of the admission ticket to get this hypothesis
taken seriously by the old boys club, which cytology surely was back in
1970. I can see that for a 32 year old woman proposing a radical
revision of cellular evolution in 1970, showing the slightest weakness
in this area might have been fatal to her ideas. Still, I can't help
thinking that even a few hundred extra words when introducing the most
obscure terminology would have greatly improved accessibility of this
work.
The proposal that symbiosis of flagellates lead to the development of
mitosis, however, was difficult for me to understand. Perhaps the gaps
in my vocabulary and my insufficient background in microbiology created
and perpetuated my confusion in this area. But it seemed like the
description was just unclear and incomplete. On the other hand, the
various stages in the proposed integration of the flagellar endosymbiont
(see?) into eukaryotic reproduction was used to good (and reasonably
clear) effect to rearrange the relationships among lower eukaryotes.
I rate the book as four stars instead of five, for the confusion with
flagellates and the lack of even a small amount of help with the
vocabulary. But if you don't mind a challenge and like seeing how
powerful ideas are developed, you will not be disappointed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No