Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 27 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the best reference books on races that I have read., September 10, 1997
By A Customer
This review is from: The Origin of Races (Hardcover)
This is an excellent examination of the origin of the races, physical differences between the races, and the development of the various races. Political correctness has greatly inhibited a full and complete public discussion of this topic. Too much intellectual and academic freedom has been given up in the name of political correctness. Obviously, the publisher is afraid to re-publish this book, for fear of offending someone, that is why it is currently out of print
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 25 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Probably valid despite social unacceptance, August 29, 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: The Origin of Races (Hardcover)
Good reading. Probably presents valid anthropological ideas. We should never close our eyes to his type of scientific analysis in the name of "political correctness", while ignoring the possibility that he just might be right! For a country that prides itself on open-mindedness and free speech, we can be the most censored people on earth!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
remarkable insight for its time & despite the many errors much is still valid, September 11, 2005
This review is from: The Origin of Races (Hardcover)
The first 100 pages read like Social Anthropology. The next 250 pages deal with animal anatomy and evolution. If you are not a student of Anatomy, you'll need to consult an encyclopedia 5 times per page in order to keep up. The last 400 pages deal with actual topic - the origin of races and you'll still need to keep the encyclopedia handy through that one. The glossary helps but sometimes you want more information. I learned so much from this book but only because I already knew which parts were discreditted by Genetics and which parts were still valid. For example:
Coon's theory as he expounds it in this book was that Caucasoids, Mongoloids, Negroids and Australoids and their phenotypes evolved from Homo Erectus populations living in Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia. He was wrong about that. Coon also hints that Negroids and Australoids may have developed the least from their Erectus ancestors than Mongoloids and Caucasoids.
Genetics has shown us that Humans evolved in Africa two million years ago, they entered Europe and branched into Caucasoids one hundred and twenty thousand years ago and branched into Mongoloids fourty thousand years ago in Asia. Nevertheless, it is possible to divide Humans into `races` under the same designations Coon used, (only today we call these 'human populations'). Cavalli-Sforza Genetic map of Human populations identifies Caucasoids, Mongoloids, Negroids and Australoids.
Most of the other observations on evolution and anatomy made by Coon in this book are still valid and are remarkably well thought out in spite of the fact that all the man had to work with were bones and carbon-dating. However, Coon underestimated the influence of Genetic Drift and he writes it off completely before page 60. He wisely discounted the relevance of blood-groups to `race.` Coon also came out against designating the many European phenotypes as `races` like he had in 1939 in `Races of Europe`.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|