Customer Reviews

Osama: The Making of a Terrorist

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(4)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(5)

 

 

This is an excellent and detailed portrayal of Osama bin Laden. It is like his biography so far. Being in his late forties, Osama is still relatively young, and if he survives his dangerous lifestyle as being the most wanted fugitive in the Western World, he could still achieve a lot more than he has so far. Given his line of work, this is a frightening thought.

Randal has conducted detailed research, that allowed him to portray a thorough psychological character profile of Osama from his childhood to nowadays. Contrary to what might be expected, in Randal's portrayal of Osama one sees a very capable, calculating, intelligent, and charismatic leader. He also outlines the social and historical circumstances that allowed Osama to become the defacto supranational leader of terrorist networks, giving him a certain kind of power that is second to none.

Randal covers how the House of Saud supported and promoted Osama to become a leading fundraiser to mount a guerrilla effort against the Russians in Afghanistan. We know that the CIA also helped out in setting up some of the training camps in Afghanistan to fight off the Russians. With the support of both the House of Saud and the U.S. the Jihadis succeeded beautifully and beat back the Russians in Afghanistan. But, both Saudi Arabia and the U.S. at the time in the eighties did not suspect they had created a Scorpio that would use his newly found stinging power to hurt them both [Saudi Arabia and the U.S.].

Randal describes how Osama became a superstar of the freedom fighting set of the Islamic World long before 9/11. Dubious achievements such as the masterminding of the bombing of several American embassies throughout Africa in the nineties turned Osama into a rock star so to speak within the Jihad aficionados nearly a decade before he became a household name in the U.S.

Randal also engages in a broader topic covering the weaknesses that the U.S. has in dealing with the Islamic insurrection. These weaknesses include a lack of contacts, intelligence, linguistic and cultural knowledge that would allow the infiltration of Islamic terrorist networks at the local level. In other words, Osama and his subordinates have a far easier time infiltrating the open societies of Western countries than the reverse.

Randal does not offer easy solutions on how to deal with the Osama threat. He recognizes that both Saudi Arabia and the U.S. have so far floundered in dealing with it. Randal does not see any quick success in controlling Al Qaeda.

Nevertheless, if you want to better understand and know who is Osama, and broaden your knowledge regarding the Islamic insurrection and their related terrorist networks; this is an excellent book that makes a valid contribution to the already abundant literature on the subject.

Randall spoke in London in October, 2005. I was there and brought the book back with me. This new (2005 paperback) edition is dramatically improved from the first, as it is informed by a mountain of data drawn together by the 911 Commission, whose report came out after Randal's first book went to press.

Insights can be hard to glean, but a careful reader will see how the terrorists now striking from small to large scales around the world got underway. And it is only too clear how hard it will be to stop them as they operate in unstructured cells in scores of countries.

One of most critical points Randal makes is that Osama's gathering and training, partly underwritten by the US backing for Afghans against the Soviets in the nineties, brought together for the first time scores of disenchanted, religiously passionate people from across Islam. Randal notes that these people, gathered to train and fight by Osama, had little knowledge of fellow thinkers outside their villages in countries scattered across the world.

Now, in the band from Morocco to the Philippines, there are trained, experienced terrorists who know they are part of a global force. This is Osama's real legacy. His killing or capture becomes a small historic fact. As Randal clearly shows, it was Osama at work in the nineties -- long before 911 -- that flows on. There are many lessons to be taken away and they are well illuminated in the new version of OSAMA.

This book was very well written. It contained a lot of historical facts about Bin Laden and about terrorism. I didn't realize how important the al-Saud factor was. It is huge and changes my perspective on what motivates OBL. I also was intrigued by the Algerian connection and the various Al qaeda lieutenants who were so important to the organization.

Insights into the Clinton and Bush administrations handling of terrorism helps frame the whole OBL issue. Its interesting to read the book after the presidential election which the author did not have privy too.

Although I thought the bias on the neocons and the GWOT was too cliche-ish, Mr Randall definitely did his homework and did a great job as a journalist and writer to inform the average American on a problem that has changed our lives. I strongly reccomend the book.

I have gone through half of the book (intend to read the other half as well) but its not the book I thought it would be. Its more of a story of the middle east politics over the past twenty years, the afhgan war and pakistan's involvement in it. Tonnes of information from personal encounters of the author and through his friends and acquaintances. Not your typical bed time book, a bit difficult to digest.

A well researched book, balanced and objective, informative and engrossing.

I am very sad that the people who gave it one star are writing as if they have to prove something.

This book has NOTHING to do with its title, which was no doubt cooked up by the publishers for post-911 marketing. This book is bascially a Washington Post reporter's memoir about stuff he covered in the Middle East, plus a lot of tedious inside baseball that probably didn't make it past the Post editors.

The self-aggrandizement is downright nauseating. Randal can easily put you to sleep with his "knowledge" and "insight". The title is a little misleading since you dont even hear a thing about Bin Laden till the sixtieth page practically. All you get from this is how the Bush administration is comparable to the Nazi propaganda machine with it's "Big Lies" and that Israel is the Great Oppresor. His constant chastizing of the Bush administration as simpletons toward their policy on Terror is quite comical since his grand idea is appeasement/containment. Wow , do you think he thought that one up all by himself. Bold thinking I'll tell ya. His blather is extremely numbing anchored by his favorite word, comeuppance. I would give it a negative star if I could

I would just like to agree with the other reviewers who gave this book one star.

Not unlike the rest of randal's work, on iraq and lebanon, this smacks of the same obsolete 3rd worldist drivel that has become a trademark of Randal's pseudo-scholarship; always straining itself to always depict muslims and arabs in the image of helpless victims, who have no say in the misfortunes that befall them. "Laa hawla wa laa quwwata illa bil laah"!!. This is not to mention Randal's simplistic understanding of Islamic culture and Muslim teachings.
I retched with every turn of the page! The level of cluelessness and immaturity of this author are just mind boggling.
I put him in the same category as his partner in asinine irresponsible journalism, Robert Fisk; both credulous, hypocritical, and mendacious propagandists. Shame on you Randy for persisting in disgracing the trade!

Jonathan Randal says he was a correspondent for the Washington Post. Walter Duranty of The New York Times wrote extensively of the Soviet Union and even won a Lenin Prize for his efforts. Duranty, it was learned after millions died of starvation, was a self-serving liar who simply denied the truth about famine in the Ukraine and deliberately misinformed the American public. Randal, in my opinion, is probably in line for some kind of award from the French government.

This book is not about the making of a terrorist: it is about how the United States and its perfidious Jewish agents in Israel forced poor Osama to murder.

Randal casts himself as an intrepid foreign correspondent, subjecting himself to great danger in search of the story. In Algeria,he says "[m]ost pale-skinned Westerners had long since departed Algeria . . .," but not Randal whose "only protection was a street-smart taxi driver." The self-adulation is enough to cause gagging.

Perhaps the worst part of Randal's tome is his use of the Washington Post and New York Times for his citations. Thus the hoary myth that deGaulle waved off photos of Soviet missiles in Cuba with "The word of the President of the United States is good enough for me" is repeated based on a false anecdote reported in the Washington Post.

In the end, all would be right if Bush weren't President, if the State of Israel ceased to exist and France were obeyed at all times. This is, in the end, a pathetically ill-informed projection of the ego of a man who thinks he is far more important than he ever was or will be.

Jerry