Other Side Of The Good News, The [Paperback]

Dixon Larry (Author)

Book Description

Publication Date: January 1, 2003

It is a time of Christian confusion and, therefore, uncertain witness. Is there a biblical doctrine of hell or are Christians free to hold a variety of viewpoints on this issue? If so, does it matter

Product Details

• Paperback: 272 pages
• Publisher: Christian Focus (January 1, 2003)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1857928040
• ISBN-13: 978-1857928044
• Product Dimensions: 8.5 x 6.3 x 0.7 inches
• Shipping Weight: 9 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,279,401 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

11 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Helpful, thorough critique of Stott and Pinnock, July 19, 2004

By 

J. S. Duplessie "Author of Obeying Jesus" (Massachusetts) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

This review is from: Other Side Of The Good News, The (Paperback)

Larry Dixon has written a very helpful book that gives an overview of the three contemporary challenges to the traditional understanding of hell as eternal torment - annihilationism, post mortem conversion and universalism. In particular he spends much time on the ideas of John Stott and Clark Pinnock who take the annihiliationist view.

Dixon defends the traditional understanding of the teaching of Jesus on eternal torment in the context both of Jesus' own teaching and also a proper theological understanding of the great offense of sin in the eyes of a holy God.

Ultimately Dixion reveals that God's grace and mercy are magnified in the provision of salvation through Jesus Christ. After all, why do we even need a savior if there is no hell?

Dixon's editors did him no favors. He frequently states a person's position and then comments on that position without making a clear distinction between the faulty position and his own comment. This leads to frequent confusion and questioning if Dixion is agreeing or disagreeing with the faulty teaching. Dixon often quotes another person and then moves on, expecting the reader to make the correct determination as to whether that quote was orthodox or heterodox. This unfortunate lack of analysis leaves the less-informed reader hanging and confused at best, or possibly even misinformed at worst.

Overall, with careful reading and a Bible close by, this is a good book to have in your library, a helpful reference for the topic, and a summary of good concise arguments.